Loading…

A Two-Stage Cooperative Multi-objective Evolutionary Differential Algorithm for Combined Heat and Power Economic Emission Dispatch

Combined heat and power economic emission dispatch (CHPEED) can obtain good economic and environmental benefits, but the dispatch problem presents non-convex, nonlinear, multi-constrained and multi-objective characteristics. Thus, a two-stage cooperative multi-objective differential evolutionary alg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011) 2023-05, Vol.48 (5), p.5889-5906
Main Authors: Fan, Chaodong, Wu, Yuetang, Hu, Hongbo, Xiao, Leyi, Yi, Lingzhi, Ning, Xiaoqing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Combined heat and power economic emission dispatch (CHPEED) can obtain good economic and environmental benefits, but the dispatch problem presents non-convex, nonlinear, multi-constrained and multi-objective characteristics. Thus, a two-stage cooperative multi-objective differential evolutionary algorithm (TCADEA) is proposed in this paper. The algorithm uses a two-stage framework: the first stage uses a two-population strategy to divide the population into an elite population and an ordinary population, where the elite population is used to obtain better target values and the ordinary population is used to search the target space to ensure the diversity of the population and update the two populations by different adaptive differential operators. In addition, the ε constraint processing technique is used to handle the constraints. The second stage combines two populations into one and generates offspring through the constrained dominance principle (CDP) and adaptive differential evolution to maintain well-distributed population. The actual case results show that the TCADEA algorithm reduces $0.034 × 10 6 , $0.008 × 10 6 , $0.07 × 10 6 and 113 × 10 5  lb, 102 × 10 5  lb, 155 × 10 5  lb in fuel cost and emissions compared to MODE, NSGA-II, and TOP, respectively.
ISSN:2193-567X
1319-8025
2191-4281
DOI:10.1007/s13369-022-07124-6