Loading…
Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao
This paper excavates the practice-oriented background and therapeutic significance of emptiness in the Madhyamaka philosophy attributed to Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Buddhist emptiness unravels experiential and linguistic reification through meditation and argumentation. The historical contexts and use...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asian philosophy 2023-04, Vol.33 (2), p.125-144 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5640ceb53a76c356a8e62840cb58556becec463c750c4da7ac2407a552069c543 |
container_end_page | 144 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Asian philosophy |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Nelson, Eric S. |
description | This paper excavates the practice-oriented background and therapeutic significance of emptiness in the Madhyamaka philosophy attributed to Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Buddhist emptiness unravels experiential and linguistic reification through meditation and argumentation. The historical contexts and uses of the word indicate that it is primarily a practical diagnostic and therapeutic concept. Emptiness does not lead to further views or truths but, akin to yet distinct from Ajñāna and Pyrrhonian skepticism, the suspension of assertion. This sense of emptiness as a practice can be traced in the intercultural transmission of Madhyamaka from Nāgārjuna, its paradigmatic philosopher, to Sengzhao 僧肇, its first pivotal indigenous Chinese representative. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09552367.2023.2179966 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2801826102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2801826102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5640ceb53a76c356a8e62840cb58556becec463c750c4da7ac2407a552069c543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEiRuDZl7cQb5wQIlR-pggNwtlzXKSmNXexUqNz6bn0wHFqunFbanZnVfIScUxhSEHAJJecsw2LIgGVDRouyRDwgPZpjmbIS6SHpdZq0Ex2TkxDmAMARaI9cjZplW1sTwiCxZqba2tlBouw0CR8mXnQdmqS2ydN2M9tu_Hxl1e_1xdjZ97typ-SoUotgzvazT97uRq-3D-n4-f7x9macaiawTTnmoM2EZ6pAnXFUwiATcTfhgnOcGG10jpkuOOh8qgqlWQ6Fir0AS83zrE8udrlL7z5XJrRy7lbexpeSCaCCIY3l-4TvVNq7ELyp5NLXjfJrSUF2rOQfK9mxkntW0Xe989W2cr5RX84vprJV64XzlVc2UpDZ_xE_TgZv2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801826102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Nelson, Eric S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper excavates the practice-oriented background and therapeutic significance of emptiness in the Madhyamaka philosophy attributed to Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Buddhist emptiness unravels experiential and linguistic reification through meditation and argumentation. The historical contexts and uses of the word indicate that it is primarily a practical diagnostic and therapeutic concept. Emptiness does not lead to further views or truths but, akin to yet distinct from Ajñāna and Pyrrhonian skepticism, the suspension of assertion. This sense of emptiness as a practice can be traced in the intercultural transmission of Madhyamaka from Nāgārjuna, its paradigmatic philosopher, to Sengzhao 僧肇, its first pivotal indigenous Chinese representative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-2367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2023.2179966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Argumentation ; Buddhism ; Chinese languages ; emptiness ; Intercultural communication ; Meditation ; Negation ; Nāgārjuna ; Philosophy ; Sengzhao ; Skepticism ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>Asian philosophy, 2023-04, Vol.33 (2), p.125-144</ispartof><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5640ceb53a76c356a8e62840cb58556becec463c750c4da7ac2407a552069c543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33849</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><title>Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao</title><title>Asian philosophy</title><description>This paper excavates the practice-oriented background and therapeutic significance of emptiness in the Madhyamaka philosophy attributed to Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Buddhist emptiness unravels experiential and linguistic reification through meditation and argumentation. The historical contexts and uses of the word indicate that it is primarily a practical diagnostic and therapeutic concept. Emptiness does not lead to further views or truths but, akin to yet distinct from Ajñāna and Pyrrhonian skepticism, the suspension of assertion. This sense of emptiness as a practice can be traced in the intercultural transmission of Madhyamaka from Nāgārjuna, its paradigmatic philosopher, to Sengzhao 僧肇, its first pivotal indigenous Chinese representative.</description><subject>Argumentation</subject><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>emptiness</subject><subject>Intercultural communication</subject><subject>Meditation</subject><subject>Negation</subject><subject>Nāgārjuna</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Sengzhao</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>0955-2367</issn><issn>1469-2961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEiRuDZl7cQb5wQIlR-pggNwtlzXKSmNXexUqNz6bn0wHFqunFbanZnVfIScUxhSEHAJJecsw2LIgGVDRouyRDwgPZpjmbIS6SHpdZq0Ex2TkxDmAMARaI9cjZplW1sTwiCxZqba2tlBouw0CR8mXnQdmqS2ydN2M9tu_Hxl1e_1xdjZ97typ-SoUotgzvazT97uRq-3D-n4-f7x9macaiawTTnmoM2EZ6pAnXFUwiATcTfhgnOcGG10jpkuOOh8qgqlWQ6Fir0AS83zrE8udrlL7z5XJrRy7lbexpeSCaCCIY3l-4TvVNq7ELyp5NLXjfJrSUF2rOQfK9mxkntW0Xe989W2cr5RX84vprJV64XzlVc2UpDZ_xE_TgZv2A</recordid><startdate>20230403</startdate><enddate>20230403</enddate><creator>Nelson, Eric S.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230403</creationdate><title>Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao</title><author>Nelson, Eric S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5640ceb53a76c356a8e62840cb58556becec463c750c4da7ac2407a552069c543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Argumentation</topic><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>emptiness</topic><topic>Intercultural communication</topic><topic>Meditation</topic><topic>Negation</topic><topic>Nāgārjuna</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Sengzhao</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Asian philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Eric S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao</atitle><jtitle>Asian philosophy</jtitle><date>2023-04-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>125-144</pages><issn>0955-2367</issn><eissn>1469-2961</eissn><abstract>This paper excavates the practice-oriented background and therapeutic significance of emptiness in the Madhyamaka philosophy attributed to Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao. Buddhist emptiness unravels experiential and linguistic reification through meditation and argumentation. The historical contexts and uses of the word indicate that it is primarily a practical diagnostic and therapeutic concept. Emptiness does not lead to further views or truths but, akin to yet distinct from Ajñāna and Pyrrhonian skepticism, the suspension of assertion. This sense of emptiness as a practice can be traced in the intercultural transmission of Madhyamaka from Nāgārjuna, its paradigmatic philosopher, to Sengzhao 僧肇, its first pivotal indigenous Chinese representative.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09552367.2023.2179966</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-2367 |
ispartof | Asian philosophy, 2023-04, Vol.33 (2), p.125-144 |
issn | 0955-2367 1469-2961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2801826102 |
source | Taylor & Francis; Humanities Index |
subjects | Argumentation Buddhism Chinese languages emptiness Intercultural communication Meditation Negation Nāgārjuna Philosophy Sengzhao Skepticism Therapy |
title | Emptiness, negation, and skepticism in Nāgārjuna and Sengzhao |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A02%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emptiness,%20negation,%20and%20skepticism%20in%20N%C4%81g%C4%81rjuna%20and%20Sengzhao&rft.jtitle=Asian%20philosophy&rft.au=Nelson,%20Eric%20S.&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=125-144&rft.issn=0955-2367&rft.eissn=1469-2961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09552367.2023.2179966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2801826102%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5640ceb53a76c356a8e62840cb58556becec463c750c4da7ac2407a552069c543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801826102&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |