Dynamics of Serological and Mucosal Antibody Responses against African Swine Fever Viruses in Experimentally Infected Pigs

• Published in: Transboundary and emerging diseases 2023-02, Vol.2023, p.1-12
• Main Authors: Xie, Qingyun, Bai, Yun, Wang, Wan, Chen, Rong, Xing, Huixuan, Wu, Yuzi, Shao, Guoqing, Bu, Zhigao, Zhao, Dongming, Feng, Zhixin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: African swine fever; Antibodies; Antigens; Comparative analysis; Diagnosis; Fever; Genomes; Genotype & phenotype; Genotypes; Hogs; Immunoglobulin G; Infections; Laboratory animals; Medical research; Mucosa; Proteins; Secretion; Serology; Swine; Target detection; Virulence; Viruses
• ISSN: 1865-1674; 1865-1682
• DOI: 10.1155/2023/9959847

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a lethal swine pathogen, and there is no effective vaccine or treatment available for ASFV infection. Recently, the occurrence of ASFV genotype I and genotype II natural mutants that manifest as subacute, longer-incubation, or persistent infections poses threats to preventing ASFV infection. The dynamics of antibody responses to ASFV are still completely unrevealed, especially the secretion of mucosal antibodies in oral fluid. Here, a systematic analysis was performed of serological and mucosal antibody secretion against 6 ASFV antigens after direct or indirect infection with four different ASFV strains or genotypes, namely, the field virulent genotype II isolate ASFV HLJ/18, the artificially attenuated genotype II strain HLJ/18-7GD, the naturally attenuated genotype II isolate HLJ/HRB1/20, and genotype I isolate SD/DY-I/21. Severe clinical signs of HLJ/18 infection were observed in pigs from 4 days postinoculation. However, no clinical signs were observed in HLJ/18-7GD-infected pigs. The contact pigs cohoused with the pigs intramuscularly infected with the isolate SD/DY-I/21 or HLJ/HRB1/20 only showed chronic clinical signs. Interestingly, the oral fluid sIgA responses to all the selected antigens were significantly stronger and earlier than the serum IgG responses in both HLJ/18- and HLJ/18-7GD-challenged pigs. Although significant fluctuations and individual differences appeared in oral swab sIgA responses in the contact transmission group, they were earlier than the corresponding serological IgG responses. Moreover, according to the comparative analysis of the three infection groups, P54 was proposed to be a dominant target for serological IgG diagnosis, while P30, CD2v, P54, P22, and P10 were more advantageous as mucosal sIgA diagnosis targets. These results highlight the important role of mucosal antibodies in the early diagnosis of ASFV infection and can provide references to screen appropriate targets for ASFV detection.