Airflow vibration of diaphragmatic breathing: model and demonstration using optical biosensor

FOS also has physical advantages, namely immune to electromagnetic (EM) wave interference, high sensitivity, and low-cost fabrication [2]-[4]. [...]FOS technology has potential for detection applications in the medical field other than in the communication field which is already commonly applied. [....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Telkomnika 2023-06, Vol.21 (3), p.667-674
Main Authors: Saktioto, Toto, Defrianto, Defrianto, Hikma, Nurfi, Soerbakti, Yan, Syamsudhuha, Syamsudhuha, Irawan, Dedi, Okfalisa, Okfalisa, Widiyatmoko, Bambang, Hanto, Dwi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abdomen
Air flow
Biosensors
Diameters
Diaphragm (anatomy)
Experimentation
Fiber optics
Finite element analysis
Medical research
Navier-Stokes equations
Sensors
Simulation
Sine waves
Velocity
Vibration
Viscosity
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:FOS also has physical advantages, namely immune to electromagnetic (EM) wave interference, high sensitivity, and low-cost fabrication [2]-[4]. [...]FOS technology has potential for detection applications in the medical field other than in the communication field which is already commonly applied. [...]sinusoidal patterns proved to be more effective than other forms in detecting changes in sensor parameters in the human body [20]. [...]the FOS technology developed in this study uses a sinusoidal configuration of SMF and FBG arranged in an elastic belt which is then attached to the diaphragm. [...]this paper discusses the phenomenon of airflow vibration for diaphragmatic breathing with a theoretical approach of simulation and experimentation. 2.SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENT MODEL This study discusses circulating airflow through lung modeling and the demonstration of an experimental approach to diaphragmatic breathing. According to the outline of the measurement results, the sinusoidal pattern formed by a buffer diameter of 0.8 cm as shown in Figure 7(b) and Figure 7(d) gives better results than 1.2 cm as shown in Figure 7(a) and Figure 7(c).
ISSN:1693-6930
2302-9293
DOI:10.12928/telkomnika.v21i3.23613