Loading…
Dirac’s Book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics as an Alternative Way of Organizing a Theory
Authoritative appraisals have qualified this book as an “axiomatic” theory. However, given that its essential content is no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be axiomatic. Indeed, in the first edition Dirac declares that he had avoided an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Foundations of science 2023-06, Vol.28 (2), p.551-574 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873 |
container_end_page | 574 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 551 |
container_title | Foundations of science |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Drago, Antonino |
description | Authoritative appraisals have qualified this book as an “axiomatic” theory. However, given that its essential content is no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be axiomatic. Indeed, in the first edition Dirac declares that he had avoided an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I show that the text aims to solve a basic problem (How quantum mechanics is similar to classical mechanics?). A previous paper analyzed all past theories of physics, chemistry and mathematics, presented by the respective authors non-axiomatically. Four characteristic features of a new model of organizing a theory were recognized. A careful examination of Dirac’s text shows that it actually applied this kind of organization of a theory, confirming formally what Kronz and Lupher suggested through intuitive categories (pragmatism and rigour), i.e. Dirac’s formulation of Quantum mechanics represents a distinct theoretical approach from von Neumann’s axiomatic approach. However, since the second edition Dirac has changed his approach: although relying again on analogy, his theory refers to the axiomatic method. Some considerations on the odd paths which led to the present formulation of QM are added. They suggest that a new foundation of this theory needs to be found. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10699-022-09835-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2807561939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747590844</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747590844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9qFDEUhwdRsLa-gFcBr7xIPZnMJJPLtWpbqNQ_FS9DNnsyTZ1NtslM6Xrla_h6PonZjiCFIgnkEL7vcA6_qnrB4JAByNeZgVCKQl1TUB1vKX9U7bFW1rRrJHtc6ppzyrqaPa2e5XwFAEoKsVfptz4Z-_vnr0zexPidXFwi-Zh8sH4zYCbRkU-TCeO0Jh_QXprgbSam3EAWw4gpmNHfIPlmtjv0PPWF-OFDT8yuU0zbg-qJM0PG53_f_err-3cXRyf07Pz49GhxRm3DYaSyA6aWzqE1brmyTFiplDSdYy1I5zorwYEUgEshG87NEhXWAoRhK4bQSb5fvZz7blK8njCP-ipOZbwh67oD2QqmuCoUnaneDKh9cHEs2_cYMJkhBnS-fC9kI1sFXdMU_vABvpwVrr19UHh1TyjMiLdjb6ac9emXz_fZemZtijkndHqT_NqkrWagd6nqOVVdUtV3qWpeJD5LucChx_Rvz_9YfwAVCaP9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2807561939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dirac’s Book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics as an Alternative Way of Organizing a Theory</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Drago, Antonino</creator><creatorcontrib>Drago, Antonino</creatorcontrib><description>Authoritative appraisals have qualified this book as an “axiomatic” theory. However, given that its essential content is no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be axiomatic. Indeed, in the first edition Dirac declares that he had avoided an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I show that the text aims to solve a basic problem (How quantum mechanics is similar to classical mechanics?). A previous paper analyzed all past theories of physics, chemistry and mathematics, presented by the respective authors non-axiomatically. Four characteristic features of a new model of organizing a theory were recognized. A careful examination of Dirac’s text shows that it actually applied this kind of organization of a theory, confirming formally what Kronz and Lupher suggested through intuitive categories (pragmatism and rigour), i.e. Dirac’s formulation of Quantum mechanics represents a distinct theoretical approach from von Neumann’s axiomatic approach. However, since the second edition Dirac has changed his approach: although relying again on analogy, his theory refers to the axiomatic method. Some considerations on the odd paths which led to the present formulation of QM are added. They suggest that a new foundation of this theory needs to be found.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1233-1821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10699-022-09835-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Classical mechanics ; Education ; Einstein, Albert ; Mathematical Logic and Foundations ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Quantum mechanics ; Quantum physics ; Quantum theory</subject><ispartof>Foundations of science, 2023-06, Vol.28 (2), p.551-574</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6002-1258</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drago, Antonino</creatorcontrib><title>Dirac’s Book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics as an Alternative Way of Organizing a Theory</title><title>Foundations of science</title><addtitle>Found Sci</addtitle><description>Authoritative appraisals have qualified this book as an “axiomatic” theory. However, given that its essential content is no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be axiomatic. Indeed, in the first edition Dirac declares that he had avoided an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I show that the text aims to solve a basic problem (How quantum mechanics is similar to classical mechanics?). A previous paper analyzed all past theories of physics, chemistry and mathematics, presented by the respective authors non-axiomatically. Four characteristic features of a new model of organizing a theory were recognized. A careful examination of Dirac’s text shows that it actually applied this kind of organization of a theory, confirming formally what Kronz and Lupher suggested through intuitive categories (pragmatism and rigour), i.e. Dirac’s formulation of Quantum mechanics represents a distinct theoretical approach from von Neumann’s axiomatic approach. However, since the second edition Dirac has changed his approach: although relying again on analogy, his theory refers to the axiomatic method. Some considerations on the odd paths which led to the present formulation of QM are added. They suggest that a new foundation of this theory needs to be found.</description><subject>Classical mechanics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Einstein, Albert</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Quantum mechanics</subject><subject>Quantum physics</subject><subject>Quantum theory</subject><issn>1233-1821</issn><issn>1572-8471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kd9qFDEUhwdRsLa-gFcBr7xIPZnMJJPLtWpbqNQ_FS9DNnsyTZ1NtslM6Xrla_h6PonZjiCFIgnkEL7vcA6_qnrB4JAByNeZgVCKQl1TUB1vKX9U7bFW1rRrJHtc6ppzyrqaPa2e5XwFAEoKsVfptz4Z-_vnr0zexPidXFwi-Zh8sH4zYCbRkU-TCeO0Jh_QXprgbSam3EAWw4gpmNHfIPlmtjv0PPWF-OFDT8yuU0zbg-qJM0PG53_f_err-3cXRyf07Pz49GhxRm3DYaSyA6aWzqE1brmyTFiplDSdYy1I5zorwYEUgEshG87NEhXWAoRhK4bQSb5fvZz7blK8njCP-ipOZbwh67oD2QqmuCoUnaneDKh9cHEs2_cYMJkhBnS-fC9kI1sFXdMU_vABvpwVrr19UHh1TyjMiLdjb6ac9emXz_fZemZtijkndHqT_NqkrWagd6nqOVVdUtV3qWpeJD5LucChx_Rvz_9YfwAVCaP9</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Drago, Antonino</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-1258</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Dirac’s Book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics as an Alternative Way of Organizing a Theory</title><author>Drago, Antonino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Classical mechanics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Einstein, Albert</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Quantum mechanics</topic><topic>Quantum physics</topic><topic>Quantum theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drago, Antonino</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Foundations of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drago, Antonino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dirac’s Book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics as an Alternative Way of Organizing a Theory</atitle><jtitle>Foundations of science</jtitle><stitle>Found Sci</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>574</epage><pages>551-574</pages><issn>1233-1821</issn><eissn>1572-8471</eissn><abstract>Authoritative appraisals have qualified this book as an “axiomatic” theory. However, given that its essential content is no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be axiomatic. Indeed, in the first edition Dirac declares that he had avoided an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I show that the text aims to solve a basic problem (How quantum mechanics is similar to classical mechanics?). A previous paper analyzed all past theories of physics, chemistry and mathematics, presented by the respective authors non-axiomatically. Four characteristic features of a new model of organizing a theory were recognized. A careful examination of Dirac’s text shows that it actually applied this kind of organization of a theory, confirming formally what Kronz and Lupher suggested through intuitive categories (pragmatism and rigour), i.e. Dirac’s formulation of Quantum mechanics represents a distinct theoretical approach from von Neumann’s axiomatic approach. However, since the second edition Dirac has changed his approach: although relying again on analogy, his theory refers to the axiomatic method. Some considerations on the odd paths which led to the present formulation of QM are added. They suggest that a new foundation of this theory needs to be found.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10699-022-09835-3</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-1258</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1233-1821 |
ispartof | Foundations of science, 2023-06, Vol.28 (2), p.551-574 |
issn | 1233-1821 1572-8471 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2807561939 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Classical mechanics Education Einstein, Albert Mathematical Logic and Foundations Methodology of the Social Sciences Philosophy Philosophy of Science Quantum mechanics Quantum physics Quantum theory |
title | Dirac’s Book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics as an Alternative Way of Organizing a Theory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A18%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dirac%E2%80%99s%20Book%20The%20Principles%20of%20Quantum%20Mechanics%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Way%20of%20Organizing%20a%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Foundations%20of%20science&rft.au=Drago,%20Antonino&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=574&rft.pages=551-574&rft.issn=1233-1821&rft.eissn=1572-8471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10699-022-09835-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747590844%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-78019bffecafbdc16c7997a8f1507ff8c70f0760eb67433abe9e2606a1d1e0873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2807561939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747590844&rfr_iscdi=true |