Loading…

Does competition from informal firms hurt job creation by formal manufacturing SMEs in developing and emerging countries? Evidence using firm-level survey data

The entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality suggests that many informal firms can compete with formal firms, and often “unfairly” so because informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that formal firms must shoulder. Thus, informal firms can negatively i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Small business economics 2023-04, Vol.60 (4), p.1659-1681
Main Author: Amin, Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3
container_end_page 1681
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1659
container_title Small business economics
container_volume 60
creator Amin, Mohammad
description The entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality suggests that many informal firms can compete with formal firms, and often “unfairly” so because informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that formal firms must shoulder. Thus, informal firms can negatively impact the performance of formal sector firms in critical areas such as jobs creation. A rigorous empirical analysis of such impact, however, is limited, and almost non-existent for jobs creation. This paper contributes to the literature by estimating the impact of competition from informal firms on the growth rate of employment of formal manufacturing SMEs in 109 developing and emerging economies. Methodologically, the paper contributes by drawing on several theoretical predictions of the entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality as a defense against endogeneity concerns. The results show that the growth rate of employment among formal sector manufacturing SMEs declines by 1 percentage point for each one standard deviation increase in informal competition. This adverse effect is bigger in countries where the business environment is less favorable to operating in the formal vs. the informal sector. Our findings have important policy implications given the shortage of high-paying formal sector jobs in most developing countries. Our results indicate that informal sector is less effective in alleviating jobs scarcity than previously thought; informality may reduce the availability of high-productivity formal manufacturing jobs; policies supporting informal sector must distinguish between informal firms that compete more vigorously against formal firms from the rest to minimize the harmful effect of informality on jobs growth in the formal sector; and a better business environment is important for ensuring greater harmony between formal SMEs and informal firms in the manufacturing sector. Plain English Summary Informal sector hurts the growth of good manufacturing jobs. The informal or unregistered sector is credited with providing jobs to millions of individuals around the globe. While the sector harbors some portion of opportunity-led entrepreneurs who are successful in terms of income, most jobs in the sector are low paying and have low productivity when compared to jobs in the formal or registered sector. The relatively high-paying and high-productivity jobs in the formal sector can be adversely affected by competition from informal sector. O
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11187-022-00672-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2807979804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2807979804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9KAzEQxoMoWKsv4CngOTrZbJPNSaTWP1DxoIK3kE2ydUt3sya7hfZlfFV324I3T8PMfL_5YD6ELilcUwBxEymlmSCQJASAi4Rsj9CITgQjICk7RiOQCSWZzD5P0VmMS4ABgxH6ufcuYuOrxrVlW_oaF8FXuKwLHyq9wkUZqoi_utDipc-xCU7vVPkGHxSVrrtCm7YLZb3Aby-z2NPYurVb-WYY6dpiV7mwGBrju7oNpYu3eLYurauNw10cNoMTWQ0Yjl1Yuw22utXn6KTQq-guDnWMPh5m79MnMn99fJ7ezYlJQbZEUwk5MyyjuS245dZAojMmGLe57vuUCy2NMYW1lAugbMLSBLjmTFsuec7G6Gp_twn-u3OxVUvfhbq3VEkGQgqZQdqrkr3KBB9jcIVqQlnpsFEU1PBRtQ9C9UGoXRBq20NsD8VmeJELf6f_oX4B9XuP8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2807979804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does competition from informal firms hurt job creation by formal manufacturing SMEs in developing and emerging countries? Evidence using firm-level survey data</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Amin, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Amin, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>The entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality suggests that many informal firms can compete with formal firms, and often “unfairly” so because informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that formal firms must shoulder. Thus, informal firms can negatively impact the performance of formal sector firms in critical areas such as jobs creation. A rigorous empirical analysis of such impact, however, is limited, and almost non-existent for jobs creation. This paper contributes to the literature by estimating the impact of competition from informal firms on the growth rate of employment of formal manufacturing SMEs in 109 developing and emerging economies. Methodologically, the paper contributes by drawing on several theoretical predictions of the entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality as a defense against endogeneity concerns. The results show that the growth rate of employment among formal sector manufacturing SMEs declines by 1 percentage point for each one standard deviation increase in informal competition. This adverse effect is bigger in countries where the business environment is less favorable to operating in the formal vs. the informal sector. Our findings have important policy implications given the shortage of high-paying formal sector jobs in most developing countries. Our results indicate that informal sector is less effective in alleviating jobs scarcity than previously thought; informality may reduce the availability of high-productivity formal manufacturing jobs; policies supporting informal sector must distinguish between informal firms that compete more vigorously against formal firms from the rest to minimize the harmful effect of informality on jobs growth in the formal sector; and a better business environment is important for ensuring greater harmony between formal SMEs and informal firms in the manufacturing sector. Plain English Summary Informal sector hurts the growth of good manufacturing jobs. The informal or unregistered sector is credited with providing jobs to millions of individuals around the globe. While the sector harbors some portion of opportunity-led entrepreneurs who are successful in terms of income, most jobs in the sector are low paying and have low productivity when compared to jobs in the formal or registered sector. The relatively high-paying and high-productivity jobs in the formal sector can be adversely affected by competition from informal sector. One reason for this is that informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that most formal firms must shoulder. This allows many non-complying informal firms to steal market share from the formal firms, undermining the latter’s growth. Using firm-level survey data for 109 developing and emerging countries, this paper finds that competition from informal firms indeed reduces the growth rate of employment among formal manufacturing SMEs. As expected, this adverse effect is much larger when the cost of operating in the formal vs. informal sector is higher and the benefits lower. The finding has several important implications for policies on jobs availability, formalization of the informal sector, and overall development. For one, a better business environment is important for achieving greater harmony between informal firms and formal SMEs in the manufacturing sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-898X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11187-022-00672-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Availability ; Business and Management ; Companies ; Competition ; Developing countries ; Employment ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Growth rate ; Industrial Organization ; Informal economy ; Job creation ; LDCs ; Management ; Manufacturing ; Market shares ; Microeconomics ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Productivity ; Regulation ; Scarcity ; Side effects ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Small business economics, 2023-04, Vol.60 (4), p.1659-1681</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9451-3629</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2807979804/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2807979804?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amin, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>Does competition from informal firms hurt job creation by formal manufacturing SMEs in developing and emerging countries? Evidence using firm-level survey data</title><title>Small business economics</title><addtitle>Small Bus Econ</addtitle><description>The entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality suggests that many informal firms can compete with formal firms, and often “unfairly” so because informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that formal firms must shoulder. Thus, informal firms can negatively impact the performance of formal sector firms in critical areas such as jobs creation. A rigorous empirical analysis of such impact, however, is limited, and almost non-existent for jobs creation. This paper contributes to the literature by estimating the impact of competition from informal firms on the growth rate of employment of formal manufacturing SMEs in 109 developing and emerging economies. Methodologically, the paper contributes by drawing on several theoretical predictions of the entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality as a defense against endogeneity concerns. The results show that the growth rate of employment among formal sector manufacturing SMEs declines by 1 percentage point for each one standard deviation increase in informal competition. This adverse effect is bigger in countries where the business environment is less favorable to operating in the formal vs. the informal sector. Our findings have important policy implications given the shortage of high-paying formal sector jobs in most developing countries. Our results indicate that informal sector is less effective in alleviating jobs scarcity than previously thought; informality may reduce the availability of high-productivity formal manufacturing jobs; policies supporting informal sector must distinguish between informal firms that compete more vigorously against formal firms from the rest to minimize the harmful effect of informality on jobs growth in the formal sector; and a better business environment is important for ensuring greater harmony between formal SMEs and informal firms in the manufacturing sector. Plain English Summary Informal sector hurts the growth of good manufacturing jobs. The informal or unregistered sector is credited with providing jobs to millions of individuals around the globe. While the sector harbors some portion of opportunity-led entrepreneurs who are successful in terms of income, most jobs in the sector are low paying and have low productivity when compared to jobs in the formal or registered sector. The relatively high-paying and high-productivity jobs in the formal sector can be adversely affected by competition from informal sector. One reason for this is that informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that most formal firms must shoulder. This allows many non-complying informal firms to steal market share from the formal firms, undermining the latter’s growth. Using firm-level survey data for 109 developing and emerging countries, this paper finds that competition from informal firms indeed reduces the growth rate of employment among formal manufacturing SMEs. As expected, this adverse effect is much larger when the cost of operating in the formal vs. informal sector is higher and the benefits lower. The finding has several important implications for policies on jobs availability, formalization of the informal sector, and overall development. For one, a better business environment is important for achieving greater harmony between informal firms and formal SMEs in the manufacturing sector.</description><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Job creation</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0921-898X</issn><issn>1573-0913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9KAzEQxoMoWKsv4CngOTrZbJPNSaTWP1DxoIK3kE2ydUt3sya7hfZlfFV324I3T8PMfL_5YD6ELilcUwBxEymlmSCQJASAi4Rsj9CITgQjICk7RiOQCSWZzD5P0VmMS4ABgxH6ufcuYuOrxrVlW_oaF8FXuKwLHyq9wkUZqoi_utDipc-xCU7vVPkGHxSVrrtCm7YLZb3Aby-z2NPYurVb-WYY6dpiV7mwGBrju7oNpYu3eLYurauNw10cNoMTWQ0Yjl1Yuw22utXn6KTQq-guDnWMPh5m79MnMn99fJ7ezYlJQbZEUwk5MyyjuS245dZAojMmGLe57vuUCy2NMYW1lAugbMLSBLjmTFsuec7G6Gp_twn-u3OxVUvfhbq3VEkGQgqZQdqrkr3KBB9jcIVqQlnpsFEU1PBRtQ9C9UGoXRBq20NsD8VmeJELf6f_oX4B9XuP8g</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Amin, Mohammad</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-3629</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Does competition from informal firms hurt job creation by formal manufacturing SMEs in developing and emerging countries? Evidence using firm-level survey data</title><author>Amin, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Job creation</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amin, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Small business economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amin, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does competition from informal firms hurt job creation by formal manufacturing SMEs in developing and emerging countries? Evidence using firm-level survey data</atitle><jtitle>Small business economics</jtitle><stitle>Small Bus Econ</stitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1659</spage><epage>1681</epage><pages>1659-1681</pages><issn>0921-898X</issn><eissn>1573-0913</eissn><abstract>The entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality suggests that many informal firms can compete with formal firms, and often “unfairly” so because informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that formal firms must shoulder. Thus, informal firms can negatively impact the performance of formal sector firms in critical areas such as jobs creation. A rigorous empirical analysis of such impact, however, is limited, and almost non-existent for jobs creation. This paper contributes to the literature by estimating the impact of competition from informal firms on the growth rate of employment of formal manufacturing SMEs in 109 developing and emerging economies. Methodologically, the paper contributes by drawing on several theoretical predictions of the entrepreneurial perspective and “legalist” view of informality as a defense against endogeneity concerns. The results show that the growth rate of employment among formal sector manufacturing SMEs declines by 1 percentage point for each one standard deviation increase in informal competition. This adverse effect is bigger in countries where the business environment is less favorable to operating in the formal vs. the informal sector. Our findings have important policy implications given the shortage of high-paying formal sector jobs in most developing countries. Our results indicate that informal sector is less effective in alleviating jobs scarcity than previously thought; informality may reduce the availability of high-productivity formal manufacturing jobs; policies supporting informal sector must distinguish between informal firms that compete more vigorously against formal firms from the rest to minimize the harmful effect of informality on jobs growth in the formal sector; and a better business environment is important for ensuring greater harmony between formal SMEs and informal firms in the manufacturing sector. Plain English Summary Informal sector hurts the growth of good manufacturing jobs. The informal or unregistered sector is credited with providing jobs to millions of individuals around the globe. While the sector harbors some portion of opportunity-led entrepreneurs who are successful in terms of income, most jobs in the sector are low paying and have low productivity when compared to jobs in the formal or registered sector. The relatively high-paying and high-productivity jobs in the formal sector can be adversely affected by competition from informal sector. One reason for this is that informal firms do not pay taxes or comply with costly regulations that most formal firms must shoulder. This allows many non-complying informal firms to steal market share from the formal firms, undermining the latter’s growth. Using firm-level survey data for 109 developing and emerging countries, this paper finds that competition from informal firms indeed reduces the growth rate of employment among formal manufacturing SMEs. As expected, this adverse effect is much larger when the cost of operating in the formal vs. informal sector is higher and the benefits lower. The finding has several important implications for policies on jobs availability, formalization of the informal sector, and overall development. For one, a better business environment is important for achieving greater harmony between informal firms and formal SMEs in the manufacturing sector.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11187-022-00672-z</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-3629</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-898X
ispartof Small business economics, 2023-04, Vol.60 (4), p.1659-1681
issn 0921-898X
1573-0913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2807979804
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature
subjects Availability
Business and Management
Companies
Competition
Developing countries
Employment
Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurship
Growth rate
Industrial Organization
Informal economy
Job creation
LDCs
Management
Manufacturing
Market shares
Microeconomics
Polls & surveys
Productivity
Regulation
Scarcity
Side effects
Taxation
title Does competition from informal firms hurt job creation by formal manufacturing SMEs in developing and emerging countries? Evidence using firm-level survey data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A58%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20competition%20from%20informal%20firms%20hurt%20job%20creation%20by%20formal%20manufacturing%20SMEs%20in%20developing%20and%20emerging%20countries?%20Evidence%20using%20firm-level%20survey%20data&rft.jtitle=Small%20business%20economics&rft.au=Amin,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1659&rft.epage=1681&rft.pages=1659-1681&rft.issn=0921-898X&rft.eissn=1573-0913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11187-022-00672-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2807979804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a190b3c381bdf6d6dc02a83736dba6d6467a9cccfdd167013534206a63ad696b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2807979804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true