Loading…
Is there causation in fundamental physics? New insights from process matrices and quantum causal modelling
In this article we set out to understand the significance of the process matrix formalism and the quantum causal modelling programme for ongoing disputes about the role of causation in fundamental physics. We argue that the process matrix programme has correctly identified a notion of ‘causal order’...
Saved in:
Published in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2023-04, Vol.201 (5), p.152, Article 152 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 152 |
container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 201 |
creator | Adlam, Emily |
description | In this article we set out to understand the significance of the process matrix formalism and the quantum causal modelling programme for ongoing disputes about the role of causation in fundamental physics. We argue that the process matrix programme has correctly identified a notion of ‘causal order’ which plays an important role in fundamental physics, but this notion is weaker than the common-sense conception of causation because it does not involve asymmetry. We argue that causal order plays an important role in grounding more familiar causal phenomena. Then we apply these conclusions to the causal modelling programme within quantum foundations, arguing that since no-signalling quantum correlations cannot exhibit causal order, they should not be analysed using classical causal models. This resolves an open question about how to interpret fine-tuning in classical causal models of no-signalling correlations. Finally we observe that a quantum generalization of causal modelling can play a similar functional role to standard causal reasoning, but we emphasize that this functional characterisation does not entail that quantum causal models offer novel explanations of quantum processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-023-04160-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2807981309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2807981309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA82o-9isnkaK1UPTSe0izs-2W3WybySLtrze6gp48zQzzvu8MDyG3nN1zxooH5FwIlTAhE5bynCWnMzLhWRFHlafnf_pLcoW4Y4zzPGUTslsgDVvwQK0Z0ISmd7RxtB5cZTpwwbR0vz1iY_GRvsFH3GGz2Qakte87uve9BUTameCb2FHjKnoYjAtDNwa2tOsraNvGba7JRW1ahJufOiWrl-fV7DVZvs8Xs6dlYiVXIbEZT21lTW6zGlRqCqFELUWagYEyK0Axy4BLXmZZnvJ1bZU0a6lA5oWslJFTcjfGxucOA2DQu37wLl7UomSFKrlkKqrEqLK-R_RQ671vOuOPmjP9hVSPSHVEqr-R6lM0ydGEUew24H-j_3F9AuJBe6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2807981309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there causation in fundamental physics? New insights from process matrices and quantum causal modelling</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Adlam, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Adlam, Emily</creatorcontrib><description>In this article we set out to understand the significance of the process matrix formalism and the quantum causal modelling programme for ongoing disputes about the role of causation in fundamental physics. We argue that the process matrix programme has correctly identified a notion of ‘causal order’ which plays an important role in fundamental physics, but this notion is weaker than the common-sense conception of causation because it does not involve asymmetry. We argue that causal order plays an important role in grounding more familiar causal phenomena. Then we apply these conclusions to the causal modelling programme within quantum foundations, arguing that since no-signalling quantum correlations cannot exhibit causal order, they should not be analysed using classical causal models. This resolves an open question about how to interpret fine-tuning in classical causal models of no-signalling correlations. Finally we observe that a quantum generalization of causal modelling can play a similar functional role to standard causal reasoning, but we emphasize that this functional characterisation does not entail that quantum causal models offer novel explanations of quantum processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04160-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Causality ; Education ; Epistemology ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Original Research ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2023-04, Vol.201 (5), p.152, Article 152</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5998-7685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2807981309/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2807981309?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12860,27923,27924,34774,44199,62660,62661,62676,73967,74499</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adlam, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>Is there causation in fundamental physics? New insights from process matrices and quantum causal modelling</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>In this article we set out to understand the significance of the process matrix formalism and the quantum causal modelling programme for ongoing disputes about the role of causation in fundamental physics. We argue that the process matrix programme has correctly identified a notion of ‘causal order’ which plays an important role in fundamental physics, but this notion is weaker than the common-sense conception of causation because it does not involve asymmetry. We argue that causal order plays an important role in grounding more familiar causal phenomena. Then we apply these conclusions to the causal modelling programme within quantum foundations, arguing that since no-signalling quantum correlations cannot exhibit causal order, they should not be analysed using classical causal models. This resolves an open question about how to interpret fine-tuning in classical causal models of no-signalling correlations. Finally we observe that a quantum generalization of causal modelling can play a similar functional role to standard causal reasoning, but we emphasize that this functional characterisation does not entail that quantum causal models offer novel explanations of quantum processes.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>1573-0964</issn><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA82o-9isnkaK1UPTSe0izs-2W3WybySLtrze6gp48zQzzvu8MDyG3nN1zxooH5FwIlTAhE5bynCWnMzLhWRFHlafnf_pLcoW4Y4zzPGUTslsgDVvwQK0Z0ISmd7RxtB5cZTpwwbR0vz1iY_GRvsFH3GGz2Qakte87uve9BUTameCb2FHjKnoYjAtDNwa2tOsraNvGba7JRW1ahJufOiWrl-fV7DVZvs8Xs6dlYiVXIbEZT21lTW6zGlRqCqFELUWagYEyK0Axy4BLXmZZnvJ1bZU0a6lA5oWslJFTcjfGxucOA2DQu37wLl7UomSFKrlkKqrEqLK-R_RQ671vOuOPmjP9hVSPSHVEqr-R6lM0ydGEUew24H-j_3F9AuJBe6k</recordid><startdate>20230421</startdate><enddate>20230421</enddate><creator>Adlam, Emily</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-7685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230421</creationdate><title>Is there causation in fundamental physics? New insights from process matrices and quantum causal modelling</title><author>Adlam, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adlam, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adlam, Emily</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there causation in fundamental physics? New insights from process matrices and quantum causal modelling</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2023-04-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>201</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>152</spage><pages>152-</pages><artnum>152</artnum><issn>1573-0964</issn><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>In this article we set out to understand the significance of the process matrix formalism and the quantum causal modelling programme for ongoing disputes about the role of causation in fundamental physics. We argue that the process matrix programme has correctly identified a notion of ‘causal order’ which plays an important role in fundamental physics, but this notion is weaker than the common-sense conception of causation because it does not involve asymmetry. We argue that causal order plays an important role in grounding more familiar causal phenomena. Then we apply these conclusions to the causal modelling programme within quantum foundations, arguing that since no-signalling quantum correlations cannot exhibit causal order, they should not be analysed using classical causal models. This resolves an open question about how to interpret fine-tuning in classical causal models of no-signalling correlations. Finally we observe that a quantum generalization of causal modelling can play a similar functional role to standard causal reasoning, but we emphasize that this functional characterisation does not entail that quantum causal models offer novel explanations of quantum processes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-023-04160-z</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-7685</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-0964 |
ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2023-04, Vol.201 (5), p.152, Article 152 |
issn | 1573-0964 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2807981309 |
source | Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Springer Nature; ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | Causality Education Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Original Research Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science Physics |
title | Is there causation in fundamental physics? New insights from process matrices and quantum causal modelling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A02%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20causation%20in%20fundamental%20physics?%20New%20insights%20from%20process%20matrices%20and%20quantum%20causal%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Adlam,%20Emily&rft.date=2023-04-21&rft.volume=201&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=152&rft.pages=152-&rft.artnum=152&rft.issn=1573-0964&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-023-04160-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2807981309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c514cdca6c5fe94a7292f3245eae857e90c0e131855641bfc93ab39e3673d9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2807981309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |