Loading…

Palm live aboveground biomass in the riparian zones of a forest in Central Amazonia

Aboveground biomass estimates in the Amazon region remain uncertain, partly due to extrapolations based mainly on samples collected in upland terrains of terra‐firme forests. Most biomass estimates were focused on dicotyledonous trees or included other plant groups as a category of trees. Palms domi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biotropica 2023-05, Vol.55 (3), p.639-649
Main Authors: Falen, Lourdes, Guedes, Mariane, Castilho, Carolina V., Jorge, Rafael F., Bezerra, Francisco M., Magnusson, William E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aboveground biomass estimates in the Amazon region remain uncertain, partly due to extrapolations based mainly on samples collected in upland terrains of terra‐firme forests. Most biomass estimates were focused on dicotyledonous trees or included other plant groups as a category of trees. Palms dominate areas that represent 20% of the Brazilian Amazon. However, their contribution to biomass estimates and the variation within riparian zones remain poorly documented. We estimated the biomass of palms larger than 1–cm diameter at breast height (1.3 m aboveground) in riparian plots (n = 40); investigated the potential bias caused by the use of dicotyledonous‐ or family‐ rather than species‐level equations for biomass estimation; compared palm biomass between riparian and non‐riparian plots (n = 72); and evaluated the effects of soil, topography, and stream characteristics in riparian plots on palm biomass. Mean palm biomass in riparian zones estimated with species‐level equations (27.50 ± 12.94 Mg/ha, range: 3.32–63.27 Mg/ha) was three times greater than biomass estimated with a family‐level equation (9.04 ± 4.29 Mg/ha, range: 1.51–21.25 Mg/ha) and was greater than mean biomass estimated with a pantropical equation (20.46 ± 9.29 Mg/ha, range: 3.67–47.99 Mg/ha). Mean palm biomass in riparian zones was four times greater than in non‐riparian zones. Palm biomass was high in flatter areas with poorly drained soils, but lower around streams with higher discharge. Inclusion of palms can contribute to reducing the uncertainties in biomass estimates in Amazonian forests. Recognition of the importance of riparian zones may improve conservation policies. in Portuguese is available with online material. Resumo Biomassa viva acima do solo de palmeiras nas zonas ripárias de uma floresta na Amazônia Central Estimativas de biomassa acima do solo na região amazônica permanecem incertas, em parte devido a extrapolações baseadas principalmente em amostras coletadas em terrenos de terra alta de florestas de terra firme. A maioria das estimativas de biomassa foram focadas em árvores dicotiledôneas ou incluíram outros grupos de plantas como uma categoria de árvore. Palmeiras dominam áreas que representam 20% da Amazônia brasileira. Entretanto, sua contribuição às estimativas de biomassa e a variação dentro de zonas ripárias permanecem pobremente documentadas. Nós estimamos a biomassa de palmeiras maiores que 1–cm de diâmetro à altura do peito (1,3 m) em parcelas ripárias (n = 40);
ISSN:0006-3606
1744-7429
DOI:10.1111/btp.13215