Loading…
Dynamic resource‐acquisition strategies: Analysis of survivor betweenness centrality relationships after downsizing
This paper investigates dynamic changes in instrumental (i.e., work‐related) tie‐seeking patterns and the structure of a communication network following a downsizing event—whereby many employees are simultaneously eliminated from a network. Our analysis spans a two‐year period and applies a resource...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 2023-06, Vol.96 (2), p.378-396 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-b5dbd7f6a4a1f61acf8cb9dfb36fccbe35f964a9b7818ddc3d3ee68d74905de13 |
container_end_page | 396 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Moore, Ozias A. Susskind, Alex M. Margolin, Drew |
description | This paper investigates dynamic changes in instrumental (i.e., work‐related) tie‐seeking patterns and the structure of a communication network following a downsizing event—whereby many employees are simultaneously eliminated from a network. Our analysis spans a two‐year period and applies a resource‐ and network‐change approach to examine how survivors develop revised resource‐acquisition strategies while repositioning themselves after a downsizing. Our results demonstrate that two temporary logics of tie formation—a suspension of within‐unit homophily and a preference for seeking ties with long‐tenured employees—help employees acquire betweenness centrality during the disruption period. Specifically, we find that disruption initiates a transitional period after downsizing in which new tie‐making logics are employed, including seeking out ties with long‐tenured employees and employees outside of one's department. We observed post‐disruption, during the stabilization period after downsizing, where logics used for tie‐making in the disruption period were abandoned, pre‐disruption tie‐making logics were resumed, and betweenness centrality remained relatively constant. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these results and suggest future research directions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joop.12418 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2811159126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811159126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-b5dbd7f6a4a1f61acf8cb9dfb36fccbe35f964a9b7818ddc3d3ee68d74905de13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqWw8ASW2JBS4vw6bBX_qFIZYI4c-7q4SuPWN2kVJh6BZ-RJcAkzZ7nLd490PkLOWThhPldLa9cTFiWMH5BRFCZJwOMoPSSjsMjigOUFPyYniMvQJ0_yEelu-0asjKQO0HZOwvfnl5CbzqBpjW0otk60sDCA13TaiLpHg9Rqip3bmq11tIJ2B9A0gEglNB6vTdv7ulrsC_DdrJEK3YKjyu4aNB-mWZySIy1qhLO_OyZv93evN4_BbP7wdDOdBZIVIQ-qVFUq15lIBNMZE1JzWRVKV3GmpawgTnWRJaKocs64UjJWMUDGVZ4UYaqAxWNyMfSund10gG259CP9DCwj7n2lBYsyT10OlHQW0YEu186shOtLFpZ7reVea_mr1cNsgHemhv4fsnyez1-Gnx9ZcYDn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811159126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic resource‐acquisition strategies: Analysis of survivor betweenness centrality relationships after downsizing</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Moore, Ozias A. ; Susskind, Alex M. ; Margolin, Drew</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ozias A. ; Susskind, Alex M. ; Margolin, Drew</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates dynamic changes in instrumental (i.e., work‐related) tie‐seeking patterns and the structure of a communication network following a downsizing event—whereby many employees are simultaneously eliminated from a network. Our analysis spans a two‐year period and applies a resource‐ and network‐change approach to examine how survivors develop revised resource‐acquisition strategies while repositioning themselves after a downsizing. Our results demonstrate that two temporary logics of tie formation—a suspension of within‐unit homophily and a preference for seeking ties with long‐tenured employees—help employees acquire betweenness centrality during the disruption period. Specifically, we find that disruption initiates a transitional period after downsizing in which new tie‐making logics are employed, including seeking out ties with long‐tenured employees and employees outside of one's department. We observed post‐disruption, during the stabilization period after downsizing, where logics used for tie‐making in the disruption period were abandoned, pre‐disruption tie‐making logics were resumed, and betweenness centrality remained relatively constant. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these results and suggest future research directions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joop.12418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leicester: British Psychological Society</publisher><subject>betweenness centrality ; Disruption ; Downsizing ; Employees ; network excision ; Occupational psychology ; Stabilization ; Survivor ; Suspension ; tie‐seeking logics</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2023-06, Vol.96 (2), p.378-396</ispartof><rights>2022 The British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-b5dbd7f6a4a1f61acf8cb9dfb36fccbe35f964a9b7818ddc3d3ee68d74905de13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5215-3493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ozias A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susskind, Alex M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margolin, Drew</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic resource‐acquisition strategies: Analysis of survivor betweenness centrality relationships after downsizing</title><title>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</title><description>This paper investigates dynamic changes in instrumental (i.e., work‐related) tie‐seeking patterns and the structure of a communication network following a downsizing event—whereby many employees are simultaneously eliminated from a network. Our analysis spans a two‐year period and applies a resource‐ and network‐change approach to examine how survivors develop revised resource‐acquisition strategies while repositioning themselves after a downsizing. Our results demonstrate that two temporary logics of tie formation—a suspension of within‐unit homophily and a preference for seeking ties with long‐tenured employees—help employees acquire betweenness centrality during the disruption period. Specifically, we find that disruption initiates a transitional period after downsizing in which new tie‐making logics are employed, including seeking out ties with long‐tenured employees and employees outside of one's department. We observed post‐disruption, during the stabilization period after downsizing, where logics used for tie‐making in the disruption period were abandoned, pre‐disruption tie‐making logics were resumed, and betweenness centrality remained relatively constant. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these results and suggest future research directions.</description><subject>betweenness centrality</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Downsizing</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>network excision</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Survivor</subject><subject>Suspension</subject><subject>tie‐seeking logics</subject><issn>0963-1798</issn><issn>2044-8325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqWw8ASW2JBS4vw6bBX_qFIZYI4c-7q4SuPWN2kVJh6BZ-RJcAkzZ7nLd490PkLOWThhPldLa9cTFiWMH5BRFCZJwOMoPSSjsMjigOUFPyYniMvQJ0_yEelu-0asjKQO0HZOwvfnl5CbzqBpjW0otk60sDCA13TaiLpHg9Rqip3bmq11tIJ2B9A0gEglNB6vTdv7ulrsC_DdrJEK3YKjyu4aNB-mWZySIy1qhLO_OyZv93evN4_BbP7wdDOdBZIVIQ-qVFUq15lIBNMZE1JzWRVKV3GmpawgTnWRJaKocs64UjJWMUDGVZ4UYaqAxWNyMfSund10gG259CP9DCwj7n2lBYsyT10OlHQW0YEu186shOtLFpZ7reVea_mr1cNsgHemhv4fsnyez1-Gnx9ZcYDn</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Moore, Ozias A.</creator><creator>Susskind, Alex M.</creator><creator>Margolin, Drew</creator><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-3493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Dynamic resource‐acquisition strategies: Analysis of survivor betweenness centrality relationships after downsizing</title><author>Moore, Ozias A. ; Susskind, Alex M. ; Margolin, Drew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-b5dbd7f6a4a1f61acf8cb9dfb36fccbe35f964a9b7818ddc3d3ee68d74905de13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>betweenness centrality</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Downsizing</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>network excision</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Survivor</topic><topic>Suspension</topic><topic>tie‐seeking logics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ozias A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susskind, Alex M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margolin, Drew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Ozias A.</au><au>Susskind, Alex M.</au><au>Margolin, Drew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic resource‐acquisition strategies: Analysis of survivor betweenness centrality relationships after downsizing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>378-396</pages><issn>0963-1798</issn><eissn>2044-8325</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates dynamic changes in instrumental (i.e., work‐related) tie‐seeking patterns and the structure of a communication network following a downsizing event—whereby many employees are simultaneously eliminated from a network. Our analysis spans a two‐year period and applies a resource‐ and network‐change approach to examine how survivors develop revised resource‐acquisition strategies while repositioning themselves after a downsizing. Our results demonstrate that two temporary logics of tie formation—a suspension of within‐unit homophily and a preference for seeking ties with long‐tenured employees—help employees acquire betweenness centrality during the disruption period. Specifically, we find that disruption initiates a transitional period after downsizing in which new tie‐making logics are employed, including seeking out ties with long‐tenured employees and employees outside of one's department. We observed post‐disruption, during the stabilization period after downsizing, where logics used for tie‐making in the disruption period were abandoned, pre‐disruption tie‐making logics were resumed, and betweenness centrality remained relatively constant. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these results and suggest future research directions.</abstract><cop>Leicester</cop><pub>British Psychological Society</pub><doi>10.1111/joop.12418</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-3493</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-1798 |
ispartof | Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2023-06, Vol.96 (2), p.378-396 |
issn | 0963-1798 2044-8325 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2811159126 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | betweenness centrality Disruption Downsizing Employees network excision Occupational psychology Stabilization Survivor Suspension tie‐seeking logics |
title | Dynamic resource‐acquisition strategies: Analysis of survivor betweenness centrality relationships after downsizing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20resource%E2%80%90acquisition%20strategies:%20Analysis%20of%20survivor%20betweenness%20centrality%20relationships%20after%20downsizing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Moore,%20Ozias%20A.&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=378-396&rft.issn=0963-1798&rft.eissn=2044-8325&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joop.12418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811159126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-b5dbd7f6a4a1f61acf8cb9dfb36fccbe35f964a9b7818ddc3d3ee68d74905de13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811159126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |