Loading…

The impact of nonlinear tide-surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides

Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine geodesy 2023-05, Vol.46 (3), p.251-270
Main Authors: Guarneri, H., Verlaan, M., Slobbe, D. C., Veenstra, J., Zijl, F., Pietrzak, J., Snellen, M., Keyzer, L., Afrasteh, Y., Klees, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a46579ac1263b6a4a00227d1b8a5952e4e3255f3de2be5c5357471b7bb8dcf643
container_end_page 270
container_issue 3
container_start_page 251
container_title Marine geodesy
container_volume 46
creator Guarneri, H.
Verlaan, M.
Slobbe, D. C.
Veenstra, J.
Zijl, F.
Pietrzak, J.
Snellen, M.
Keyzer, L.
Afrasteh, Y.
Klees, R.
description Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide-surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide-surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model - Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide-surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide-surge interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2811774253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811774253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a46579ac1263b6a4a00227d1b8a5952e4e3255f3de2be5c5357471b7bb8dcf643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVjwvDWfm92bUvyCgpcKegrZzaymbJOapEr_vVlbr8LAHOZ534EHoUuCZwTX-BoT3mBOmhnFlM0okQLX_AhNiKCkxBV-PUaTkSlH6BSdxbjCGHPBqgl6W35AYdcb3aXC94XzbrAOdCiSNVDGbXjPZ5cgZMB6V-SJOsEw2ARF0CaTekh2DRkpDQT7BeY3G8_RSa-HCBeHPUUv93fL-WO5eH54mt8uyo4xlkrNKyEb3RFasbbSXGNMqTSkrbVoBAUOjArRMwO0BdEJJiSXpJVtW5uurziboqt97yb4zy3EpFZ-G1x-qWhNiJScCpYpsae64GMM0KtNsGsddopgNVpUfxbVaFEdLObczT5nXe_DWn_7MBiV9G7woQ_adTYq9n_FDzh4eUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811774253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of nonlinear tide-surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Guarneri, H. ; Verlaan, M. ; Slobbe, D. C. ; Veenstra, J. ; Zijl, F. ; Pietrzak, J. ; Snellen, M. ; Keyzer, L. ; Afrasteh, Y. ; Klees, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guarneri, H. ; Verlaan, M. ; Slobbe, D. C. ; Veenstra, J. ; Zijl, F. ; Pietrzak, J. ; Snellen, M. ; Keyzer, L. ; Afrasteh, Y. ; Klees, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide-surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide-surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model - Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide-surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide-surge interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-0419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-060X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Altimeters ; Altimetry ; Atmospheric correction ; Atmospheric models ; Coastal waters ; Continental shelves ; Finite element method ; Harmonic analysis ; Modelling ; Ocean models ; Oceans ; Radar altimeters ; Radio altimeters ; Satellite altimetry ; Satellite radar ; satellite radar altimetry ; shallow waters ; Tidal constituents ; Tidal models ; Tide gauges ; tide-surge interactions ; Tides ; Time series ; variance reduction ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>Marine geodesy, 2023-05, Vol.46 (3), p.251-270</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a46579ac1263b6a4a00227d1b8a5952e4e3255f3de2be5c5357471b7bb8dcf643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guarneri, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verlaan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobbe, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veenstra, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijl, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snellen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyzer, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afrasteh, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klees, R.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of nonlinear tide-surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides</title><title>Marine geodesy</title><description>Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide-surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide-surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model - Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide-surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide-surge interactions.</description><subject>Altimeters</subject><subject>Altimetry</subject><subject>Atmospheric correction</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Continental shelves</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Harmonic analysis</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Radar altimeters</subject><subject>Radio altimeters</subject><subject>Satellite altimetry</subject><subject>Satellite radar</subject><subject>satellite radar altimetry</subject><subject>shallow waters</subject><subject>Tidal constituents</subject><subject>Tidal models</subject><subject>Tide gauges</subject><subject>tide-surge interactions</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>variance reduction</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>0149-0419</issn><issn>1521-060X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVjwvDWfm92bUvyCgpcKegrZzaymbJOapEr_vVlbr8LAHOZ534EHoUuCZwTX-BoT3mBOmhnFlM0okQLX_AhNiKCkxBV-PUaTkSlH6BSdxbjCGHPBqgl6W35AYdcb3aXC94XzbrAOdCiSNVDGbXjPZ5cgZMB6V-SJOsEw2ARF0CaTekh2DRkpDQT7BeY3G8_RSa-HCBeHPUUv93fL-WO5eH54mt8uyo4xlkrNKyEb3RFasbbSXGNMqTSkrbVoBAUOjArRMwO0BdEJJiSXpJVtW5uurziboqt97yb4zy3EpFZ-G1x-qWhNiJScCpYpsae64GMM0KtNsGsddopgNVpUfxbVaFEdLObczT5nXe_DWn_7MBiV9G7woQ_adTYq9n_FDzh4eUI</recordid><startdate>20230504</startdate><enddate>20230504</enddate><creator>Guarneri, H.</creator><creator>Verlaan, M.</creator><creator>Slobbe, D. C.</creator><creator>Veenstra, J.</creator><creator>Zijl, F.</creator><creator>Pietrzak, J.</creator><creator>Snellen, M.</creator><creator>Keyzer, L.</creator><creator>Afrasteh, Y.</creator><creator>Klees, R.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230504</creationdate><title>The impact of nonlinear tide-surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides</title><author>Guarneri, H. ; Verlaan, M. ; Slobbe, D. C. ; Veenstra, J. ; Zijl, F. ; Pietrzak, J. ; Snellen, M. ; Keyzer, L. ; Afrasteh, Y. ; Klees, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a46579ac1263b6a4a00227d1b8a5952e4e3255f3de2be5c5357471b7bb8dcf643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Altimeters</topic><topic>Altimetry</topic><topic>Atmospheric correction</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Continental shelves</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Harmonic analysis</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Radar altimeters</topic><topic>Radio altimeters</topic><topic>Satellite altimetry</topic><topic>Satellite radar</topic><topic>satellite radar altimetry</topic><topic>shallow waters</topic><topic>Tidal constituents</topic><topic>Tidal models</topic><topic>Tide gauges</topic><topic>tide-surge interactions</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>variance reduction</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guarneri, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verlaan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobbe, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veenstra, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijl, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snellen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyzer, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afrasteh, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klees, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine geodesy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guarneri, H.</au><au>Verlaan, M.</au><au>Slobbe, D. C.</au><au>Veenstra, J.</au><au>Zijl, F.</au><au>Pietrzak, J.</au><au>Snellen, M.</au><au>Keyzer, L.</au><au>Afrasteh, Y.</au><au>Klees, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of nonlinear tide-surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides</atitle><jtitle>Marine geodesy</jtitle><date>2023-05-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>251-270</pages><issn>0149-0419</issn><eissn>1521-060X</eissn><abstract>Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide-surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide-surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model - Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide-surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide-surge interactions.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-0419
ispartof Marine geodesy, 2023-05, Vol.46 (3), p.251-270
issn 0149-0419
1521-060X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2811774253
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Altimeters
Altimetry
Atmospheric correction
Atmospheric models
Coastal waters
Continental shelves
Finite element method
Harmonic analysis
Modelling
Ocean models
Oceans
Radar altimeters
Radio altimeters
Satellite altimetry
Satellite radar
satellite radar altimetry
shallow waters
Tidal constituents
Tidal models
Tide gauges
tide-surge interactions
Tides
Time series
variance reduction
Water levels
title The impact of nonlinear tide-surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20nonlinear%20tide-surge%20interaction%20on%20satellite%20radar%20altimeter-derived%20tides&rft.jtitle=Marine%20geodesy&rft.au=Guarneri,%20H.&rft.date=2023-05-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=251-270&rft.issn=0149-0419&rft.eissn=1521-060X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811774253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-a46579ac1263b6a4a00227d1b8a5952e4e3255f3de2be5c5357471b7bb8dcf643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811774253&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true