Loading…

Performance analysis of various denoising filters on intravascular ultrasound coronary artery images

Accurate diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery stenosis largely depends on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image quality. Coherent sources present during IVUS acquisition generates speckle noise and obstructs the clear view of the artery. Denoising aims to remove speckle noise while preservin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of imaging systems and technology 2023-05, Vol.33 (3), p.965-984
Main Authors: Arora, Priyanka, Singh, Parminder, Girdhar, Akshay, Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-3fa306d7aac4934c1512d87f83f121ce92218e6e4b397068576bcdfffb049cb73
container_end_page 984
container_issue 3
container_start_page 965
container_title International journal of imaging systems and technology
container_volume 33
creator Arora, Priyanka
Singh, Parminder
Girdhar, Akshay
Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
description Accurate diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery stenosis largely depends on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image quality. Coherent sources present during IVUS acquisition generates speckle noise and obstructs the clear view of the artery. Denoising aims to remove speckle noise while preserving edges and other important features. Accordingly, speckle noise suppression serves as an important preprocessing step for IVUS image analysis. This paper presents a performance analysis of various despeckling filters such as Median, Wiener, Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) filter, Wavelet, Non‐local means (NLM) and curvelet based non‐local means (CNLM) for IVUS images. To evaluate the efficacy, each filter is evaluated for three categories of cross‐sectional IVUS images, that is, healthy, mild calcification, and dense calcification of real pullbacks from four patients. As it is challenging to denoise the IVUS images with complex lesions, that is, calcified arc >180°, in this performance analysis, the denoising performance for different denoising filters is considered not only for the healthy IVUS but also for complex lesions. Various measures such as peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), feature similarity index (FSIM), and expert evaluation are used to compare these approaches. The results depict that the CNLM denoising filter outperforms others in terms of PSNR and FSIM for speckle noise suppression for IVUS images while preserving the essential edge and feature details for better image visualization and diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ima.22833
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812062785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2812062785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-3fa306d7aac4934c1512d87f83f121ce92218e6e4b397068576bcdfffb049cb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0sMTGk9Z8ktseqglKpCAaYLcexK1epXeymKN8el7Cy3Onpfnd69wC4x2iGESJzt1czQjilF2CCkeDFuVyCCeJCFKKs2DW4SWmHEMYVqiagfTfRhrhXXhuovOqG5BIMFp5UdKFPsDU-uOT8FlrXHU3MQw-dP0Z1Ukn3nYqw77JKofct1CEGr-IAVczsALOdrUm34MqqLpm7vz4Fn89PH8uXYvO2Wi8Xm0KTitGCWkVR3TKldCloqXGFScuZ5dRigrURhGBualM2VDBU84rVjW6ttQ0qhW4YnYKH8e4hhq_epKPchT7mp5IkHBNUE8arTD2OlI4hpWisPMTsMw4SI3kOUWYlf0PM7Hxkv11nhv9BuX5djBs_ZLN1Tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812062785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance analysis of various denoising filters on intravascular ultrasound coronary artery images</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Arora, Priyanka ; Singh, Parminder ; Girdhar, Akshay ; Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Arora, Priyanka ; Singh, Parminder ; Girdhar, Akshay ; Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery stenosis largely depends on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image quality. Coherent sources present during IVUS acquisition generates speckle noise and obstructs the clear view of the artery. Denoising aims to remove speckle noise while preserving edges and other important features. Accordingly, speckle noise suppression serves as an important preprocessing step for IVUS image analysis. This paper presents a performance analysis of various despeckling filters such as Median, Wiener, Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) filter, Wavelet, Non‐local means (NLM) and curvelet based non‐local means (CNLM) for IVUS images. To evaluate the efficacy, each filter is evaluated for three categories of cross‐sectional IVUS images, that is, healthy, mild calcification, and dense calcification of real pullbacks from four patients. As it is challenging to denoise the IVUS images with complex lesions, that is, calcified arc &gt;180°, in this performance analysis, the denoising performance for different denoising filters is considered not only for the healthy IVUS but also for complex lesions. Various measures such as peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), feature similarity index (FSIM), and expert evaluation are used to compare these approaches. The results depict that the CNLM denoising filter outperforms others in terms of PSNR and FSIM for speckle noise suppression for IVUS images while preserving the essential edge and feature details for better image visualization and diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ima.22833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Atherosclerosis ; Calcification ; coronary artery stenosis ; Coronary vessels ; Diagnosis ; Electromagnetic wave filters ; Image acquisition ; Image analysis ; image denoising ; Image quality ; Intravascular Ultrasound ; Lesions ; Medical imaging ; Noise generation ; Noise reduction ; Similarity ; speckle noise ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>International journal of imaging systems and technology, 2023-05, Vol.33 (3), p.965-984</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 Wiley Periodicals, LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-3fa306d7aac4934c1512d87f83f121ce92218e6e4b397068576bcdfffb049cb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8597-9355</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arora, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Parminder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girdhar, Akshay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><title>Performance analysis of various denoising filters on intravascular ultrasound coronary artery images</title><title>International journal of imaging systems and technology</title><description>Accurate diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery stenosis largely depends on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image quality. Coherent sources present during IVUS acquisition generates speckle noise and obstructs the clear view of the artery. Denoising aims to remove speckle noise while preserving edges and other important features. Accordingly, speckle noise suppression serves as an important preprocessing step for IVUS image analysis. This paper presents a performance analysis of various despeckling filters such as Median, Wiener, Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) filter, Wavelet, Non‐local means (NLM) and curvelet based non‐local means (CNLM) for IVUS images. To evaluate the efficacy, each filter is evaluated for three categories of cross‐sectional IVUS images, that is, healthy, mild calcification, and dense calcification of real pullbacks from four patients. As it is challenging to denoise the IVUS images with complex lesions, that is, calcified arc &gt;180°, in this performance analysis, the denoising performance for different denoising filters is considered not only for the healthy IVUS but also for complex lesions. Various measures such as peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), feature similarity index (FSIM), and expert evaluation are used to compare these approaches. The results depict that the CNLM denoising filter outperforms others in terms of PSNR and FSIM for speckle noise suppression for IVUS images while preserving the essential edge and feature details for better image visualization and diagnosis.</description><subject>Atherosclerosis</subject><subject>Calcification</subject><subject>coronary artery stenosis</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Electromagnetic wave filters</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>image denoising</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Intravascular Ultrasound</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Noise generation</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>speckle noise</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0899-9457</issn><issn>1098-1098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0sMTGk9Z8ktseqglKpCAaYLcexK1epXeymKN8el7Cy3Onpfnd69wC4x2iGESJzt1czQjilF2CCkeDFuVyCCeJCFKKs2DW4SWmHEMYVqiagfTfRhrhXXhuovOqG5BIMFp5UdKFPsDU-uOT8FlrXHU3MQw-dP0Z1Ukn3nYqw77JKofct1CEGr-IAVczsALOdrUm34MqqLpm7vz4Fn89PH8uXYvO2Wi8Xm0KTitGCWkVR3TKldCloqXGFScuZ5dRigrURhGBualM2VDBU84rVjW6ttQ0qhW4YnYKH8e4hhq_epKPchT7mp5IkHBNUE8arTD2OlI4hpWisPMTsMw4SI3kOUWYlf0PM7Hxkv11nhv9BuX5djBs_ZLN1Tw</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Arora, Priyanka</creator><creator>Singh, Parminder</creator><creator>Girdhar, Akshay</creator><creator>Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-9355</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Performance analysis of various denoising filters on intravascular ultrasound coronary artery images</title><author>Arora, Priyanka ; Singh, Parminder ; Girdhar, Akshay ; Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-3fa306d7aac4934c1512d87f83f121ce92218e6e4b397068576bcdfffb049cb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atherosclerosis</topic><topic>Calcification</topic><topic>coronary artery stenosis</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Electromagnetic wave filters</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>image denoising</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Intravascular Ultrasound</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Noise generation</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>speckle noise</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arora, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Parminder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girdhar, Akshay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of imaging systems and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arora, Priyanka</au><au>Singh, Parminder</au><au>Girdhar, Akshay</au><au>Vijayvergiya, Rajesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance analysis of various denoising filters on intravascular ultrasound coronary artery images</atitle><jtitle>International journal of imaging systems and technology</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>965</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>965-984</pages><issn>0899-9457</issn><eissn>1098-1098</eissn><abstract>Accurate diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery stenosis largely depends on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image quality. Coherent sources present during IVUS acquisition generates speckle noise and obstructs the clear view of the artery. Denoising aims to remove speckle noise while preserving edges and other important features. Accordingly, speckle noise suppression serves as an important preprocessing step for IVUS image analysis. This paper presents a performance analysis of various despeckling filters such as Median, Wiener, Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) filter, Wavelet, Non‐local means (NLM) and curvelet based non‐local means (CNLM) for IVUS images. To evaluate the efficacy, each filter is evaluated for three categories of cross‐sectional IVUS images, that is, healthy, mild calcification, and dense calcification of real pullbacks from four patients. As it is challenging to denoise the IVUS images with complex lesions, that is, calcified arc &gt;180°, in this performance analysis, the denoising performance for different denoising filters is considered not only for the healthy IVUS but also for complex lesions. Various measures such as peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), feature similarity index (FSIM), and expert evaluation are used to compare these approaches. The results depict that the CNLM denoising filter outperforms others in terms of PSNR and FSIM for speckle noise suppression for IVUS images while preserving the essential edge and feature details for better image visualization and diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ima.22833</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-9355</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-9457
ispartof International journal of imaging systems and technology, 2023-05, Vol.33 (3), p.965-984
issn 0899-9457
1098-1098
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2812062785
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Atherosclerosis
Calcification
coronary artery stenosis
Coronary vessels
Diagnosis
Electromagnetic wave filters
Image acquisition
Image analysis
image denoising
Image quality
Intravascular Ultrasound
Lesions
Medical imaging
Noise generation
Noise reduction
Similarity
speckle noise
Ultrasonic imaging
title Performance analysis of various denoising filters on intravascular ultrasound coronary artery images
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A37%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20analysis%20of%20various%20denoising%20filters%20on%20intravascular%20ultrasound%20coronary%20artery%20images&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20imaging%20systems%20and%20technology&rft.au=Arora,%20Priyanka&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=965&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=965-984&rft.issn=0899-9457&rft.eissn=1098-1098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ima.22833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2812062785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-3fa306d7aac4934c1512d87f83f121ce92218e6e4b397068576bcdfffb049cb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812062785&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true