Loading…

Evaluation of Statistical PMP Considering RCP Climate Change Scenarios in Republic of Korea

Extreme rainfall and floods have increased in frequency and severity in recent years, due to climate change and urbanization. Consequently, interest in estimating the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) has been burgeoning. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommends two types of methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water (Basel) 2023-05, Vol.15 (9), p.1756
Main Authors: Seo, Miru, Kim, Sunghun, Kim, Heechul, Kim, Hanbeen, Shin, Ju-Young, Heo, Jun-Haeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1756
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 15
creator Seo, Miru
Kim, Sunghun
Kim, Heechul
Kim, Hanbeen
Shin, Ju-Young
Heo, Jun-Haeng
description Extreme rainfall and floods have increased in frequency and severity in recent years, due to climate change and urbanization. Consequently, interest in estimating the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) has been burgeoning. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommends two types of methods for calculating the PMP: hydrometeorological and statistical methods. This study proposes a modified Hershfield’s nomograph method and assesses the changes in PMP values based on the two representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) scenarios in South Korea. To achieve the intended objective, five techniques were employed to compute statistical PMPs (SPMPs). Moreover, the most suitable statistical method was selected by comparing the calculated SPMP with the hydrometeorological PMP (HPMP), by applying statistical criteria. Accordingly, SPMPs from the five methods were compared with the HPMPs for the historical period of 2020 and the future period of 2100 for RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively. The results confirmed that the SPMPs from the modified Hershfield’s nomograph showed the smallest MAE (mean absolute error), MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), and RMSE (root mean square error), which are the best results compared with the HPMP with an average SPMP/HPMP ratio of 0.988 for the 2020 historical period. In addition, Hershfield’s method with varying KM exhibits the worst results for both RCP scenarios, with SPMP/HPMP ratios of 0.377 for RCP4.5 and 0.304 for RCP8.5, respectively. On the contrary, the modified Hershfield’s nomograph was the most appropriate method for estimating the future SPMPs: the average ratios were 0.878 and 0.726 for the 2100 future period under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively, in South Korea.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w15091756
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812732587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752497347</galeid><sourcerecordid>A752497347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePGxNNslmcyxL_cCKpdWThyWbTWrKNqnJruK_N6Uizhzmg3lveA-AS4ymhAh084UZEpiz4gSMcsRJRinFp__6czCJcYtSUFGWDI3A2_xTdoPsrXfQG7juUxt7q2QHl09LWHkXbauDdRu4qtLc2Z3sNazepdtouFbayWB9hNbBld4PTWfVgefRBy0vwJmRXdST3zoGr7fzl-o-WzzfPVSzRaYIwX2Wl5yXQhWiQAJR0xjEqG6JwQhh3uaFIJRjRhtFhVHMYCySVqYL07aqVYUhY3B15N0H_zHo2NdbPwSXXtZ5iXNOclbydDU9Xm1kp2vrjO-DVClbvbPKO21s2s84y6ng6WUCXB8BKvgYgzb1PiT14bvGqD74Xf_5TX4Adl1v0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812732587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Statistical PMP Considering RCP Climate Change Scenarios in Republic of Korea</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Seo, Miru ; Kim, Sunghun ; Kim, Heechul ; Kim, Hanbeen ; Shin, Ju-Young ; Heo, Jun-Haeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Seo, Miru ; Kim, Sunghun ; Kim, Heechul ; Kim, Hanbeen ; Shin, Ju-Young ; Heo, Jun-Haeng</creatorcontrib><description>Extreme rainfall and floods have increased in frequency and severity in recent years, due to climate change and urbanization. Consequently, interest in estimating the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) has been burgeoning. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommends two types of methods for calculating the PMP: hydrometeorological and statistical methods. This study proposes a modified Hershfield’s nomograph method and assesses the changes in PMP values based on the two representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) scenarios in South Korea. To achieve the intended objective, five techniques were employed to compute statistical PMPs (SPMPs). Moreover, the most suitable statistical method was selected by comparing the calculated SPMP with the hydrometeorological PMP (HPMP), by applying statistical criteria. Accordingly, SPMPs from the five methods were compared with the HPMPs for the historical period of 2020 and the future period of 2100 for RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively. The results confirmed that the SPMPs from the modified Hershfield’s nomograph showed the smallest MAE (mean absolute error), MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), and RMSE (root mean square error), which are the best results compared with the HPMP with an average SPMP/HPMP ratio of 0.988 for the 2020 historical period. In addition, Hershfield’s method with varying KM exhibits the worst results for both RCP scenarios, with SPMP/HPMP ratios of 0.377 for RCP4.5 and 0.304 for RCP8.5, respectively. On the contrary, the modified Hershfield’s nomograph was the most appropriate method for estimating the future SPMPs: the average ratios were 0.878 and 0.726 for the 2100 future period under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively, in South Korea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w15091756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Climate change ; Dams ; Datasets ; Extreme weather ; Flood damage ; Global temperature changes ; Hydrometeorology ; Precipitation ; Probable maximum precipitation ; Rain ; Rain and rainfall ; Rainfall ; Root-mean-square errors ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Statistics ; Urbanization ; Weather ; Web portals</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2023-05, Vol.15 (9), p.1756</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1520-3965 ; 0000-0001-9176-1806 ; 0000-0003-4727-3893 ; 0000-0002-7302-4324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2812732587/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2812732587?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seo, Miru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Heechul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hanbeen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Ju-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Jun-Haeng</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Statistical PMP Considering RCP Climate Change Scenarios in Republic of Korea</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Extreme rainfall and floods have increased in frequency and severity in recent years, due to climate change and urbanization. Consequently, interest in estimating the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) has been burgeoning. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommends two types of methods for calculating the PMP: hydrometeorological and statistical methods. This study proposes a modified Hershfield’s nomograph method and assesses the changes in PMP values based on the two representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) scenarios in South Korea. To achieve the intended objective, five techniques were employed to compute statistical PMPs (SPMPs). Moreover, the most suitable statistical method was selected by comparing the calculated SPMP with the hydrometeorological PMP (HPMP), by applying statistical criteria. Accordingly, SPMPs from the five methods were compared with the HPMPs for the historical period of 2020 and the future period of 2100 for RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively. The results confirmed that the SPMPs from the modified Hershfield’s nomograph showed the smallest MAE (mean absolute error), MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), and RMSE (root mean square error), which are the best results compared with the HPMP with an average SPMP/HPMP ratio of 0.988 for the 2020 historical period. In addition, Hershfield’s method with varying KM exhibits the worst results for both RCP scenarios, with SPMP/HPMP ratios of 0.377 for RCP4.5 and 0.304 for RCP8.5, respectively. On the contrary, the modified Hershfield’s nomograph was the most appropriate method for estimating the future SPMPs: the average ratios were 0.878 and 0.726 for the 2100 future period under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively, in South Korea.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Global temperature changes</subject><subject>Hydrometeorology</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Probable maximum precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain and rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Web portals</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePGxNNslmcyxL_cCKpdWThyWbTWrKNqnJruK_N6Uizhzmg3lveA-AS4ymhAh084UZEpiz4gSMcsRJRinFp__6czCJcYtSUFGWDI3A2_xTdoPsrXfQG7juUxt7q2QHl09LWHkXbauDdRu4qtLc2Z3sNazepdtouFbayWB9hNbBld4PTWfVgefRBy0vwJmRXdST3zoGr7fzl-o-WzzfPVSzRaYIwX2Wl5yXQhWiQAJR0xjEqG6JwQhh3uaFIJRjRhtFhVHMYCySVqYL07aqVYUhY3B15N0H_zHo2NdbPwSXXtZ5iXNOclbydDU9Xm1kp2vrjO-DVClbvbPKO21s2s84y6ng6WUCXB8BKvgYgzb1PiT14bvGqD74Xf_5TX4Adl1v0A</recordid><startdate>20230502</startdate><enddate>20230502</enddate><creator>Seo, Miru</creator><creator>Kim, Sunghun</creator><creator>Kim, Heechul</creator><creator>Kim, Hanbeen</creator><creator>Shin, Ju-Young</creator><creator>Heo, Jun-Haeng</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-3965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-1806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-3893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-4324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230502</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Statistical PMP Considering RCP Climate Change Scenarios in Republic of Korea</title><author>Seo, Miru ; Kim, Sunghun ; Kim, Heechul ; Kim, Hanbeen ; Shin, Ju-Young ; Heo, Jun-Haeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Global temperature changes</topic><topic>Hydrometeorology</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Probable maximum precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain and rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Web portals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seo, Miru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Heechul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hanbeen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Ju-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Jun-Haeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seo, Miru</au><au>Kim, Sunghun</au><au>Kim, Heechul</au><au>Kim, Hanbeen</au><au>Shin, Ju-Young</au><au>Heo, Jun-Haeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Statistical PMP Considering RCP Climate Change Scenarios in Republic of Korea</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-05-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1756</spage><pages>1756-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Extreme rainfall and floods have increased in frequency and severity in recent years, due to climate change and urbanization. Consequently, interest in estimating the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) has been burgeoning. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommends two types of methods for calculating the PMP: hydrometeorological and statistical methods. This study proposes a modified Hershfield’s nomograph method and assesses the changes in PMP values based on the two representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) scenarios in South Korea. To achieve the intended objective, five techniques were employed to compute statistical PMPs (SPMPs). Moreover, the most suitable statistical method was selected by comparing the calculated SPMP with the hydrometeorological PMP (HPMP), by applying statistical criteria. Accordingly, SPMPs from the five methods were compared with the HPMPs for the historical period of 2020 and the future period of 2100 for RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively. The results confirmed that the SPMPs from the modified Hershfield’s nomograph showed the smallest MAE (mean absolute error), MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), and RMSE (root mean square error), which are the best results compared with the HPMP with an average SPMP/HPMP ratio of 0.988 for the 2020 historical period. In addition, Hershfield’s method with varying KM exhibits the worst results for both RCP scenarios, with SPMP/HPMP ratios of 0.377 for RCP4.5 and 0.304 for RCP8.5, respectively. On the contrary, the modified Hershfield’s nomograph was the most appropriate method for estimating the future SPMPs: the average ratios were 0.878 and 0.726 for the 2100 future period under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively, in South Korea.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w15091756</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-3965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-1806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-3893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-4324</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2023-05, Vol.15 (9), p.1756
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2812732587
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analysis
Climate change
Dams
Datasets
Extreme weather
Flood damage
Global temperature changes
Hydrometeorology
Precipitation
Probable maximum precipitation
Rain
Rain and rainfall
Rainfall
Root-mean-square errors
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Statistics
Urbanization
Weather
Web portals
title Evaluation of Statistical PMP Considering RCP Climate Change Scenarios in Republic of Korea
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Statistical%20PMP%20Considering%20RCP%20Climate%20Change%20Scenarios%20in%20Republic%20of%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Seo,%20Miru&rft.date=2023-05-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1756&rft.pages=1756-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w15091756&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA752497347%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-287789c6960904fbf054ed3f10017d269347154bc49fc5f1193905e6fddcdc6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812732587&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A752497347&rfr_iscdi=true