Loading…
Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Wastewater treatment is a process that reduces pollution to those quantities and concentrations at which purified wastewater is no longer a threat to human and animal health and safety and does not cause unwanted changes in the environment. Municipal wastewater is classified as biodegradable water....
Saved in:
Published in: | Water (Basel) 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.1645 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1645 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Ćetković, Jasmina Knežević, Miloš Vujadinović, Radoje Tombarević, Esad Grujić, Marija |
description | Wastewater treatment is a process that reduces pollution to those quantities and concentrations at which purified wastewater is no longer a threat to human and animal health and safety and does not cause unwanted changes in the environment. Municipal wastewater is classified as biodegradable water. Special importance should be given to wastewater with a high content of organic matter (COD), phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). MBBR technology, developed on the basis of the conventional activated sludge process and the bio filter process, does not take up much space and does not have problems with activated sludge, as in the case of conventional biological reactors, and has shown good results for the removal of organic matter, phosphorus and nitrogen. The aim of this paper is to optimize the wastewater treatment process in the municipality of Dojran, North Macedonia. Three alternative solutions for improving the capacity for wastewater treatment in the municipality of Dojran were analyzed. The shortlist of variants was made on the basis of several criteria, including: analysis of the system in the tourist season and beyond, assessment of the condition and efficiency of the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in combination with a new treatment plant, treatment efficiency when using different wastewater treatment technologies, the size of the site needed to accommodate the capacity, as well as the financial parameters for the proposed system. The selection of the most favorable solution for the improvement of the wastewater treatment system was made using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. In order to select the optimal solution, a detailed analysis was conducted, considering several decision-making criteria, namely the initial investment, operating costs and management complexity. Based on the obtained results, Variant 3 was recommended, that is, the construction of a completely new station with MBBR technology, with a capacity for 6000 equivalent inhabitants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w15091645 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812746578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752497520</galeid><sourcerecordid>A752497520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaKgaA_-g4AnD1uTze5m463UjwotClYEL0uSnbTRbVKTlNJ_75aKOAPzhuG9N_AQuqRkyJggN1taEkGrojxCZznhLCuKgh7_20_RIMZP0lch6rokZ-jjFTrQyXqHvcHvMibYygQBzwPItAKX8Bz00vnOL3a3eDR5wTNIS99i6_Bs0yWbjYPtBVbiO9A27p1m8su6xQU6MbKLMPjFc_T2cD8fT7Lp8-PTeDTNNGM0ZVqbsmq1IZRparioRKu4aHPFeatJxWipoIZSchCKKsVURRnleaW4pLWoDTtHVwffdfDfG4ip-fSb4PqXTV7TnBdVyeueNTywFrKDxjrjU5C67xZWVnsHxvb3ES_zQvSD9ILrg0AHH2MA06yDXcmwayhp9nE3f3GzH09WcN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812746578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ćetković, Jasmina ; Knežević, Miloš ; Vujadinović, Radoje ; Tombarević, Esad ; Grujić, Marija</creator><creatorcontrib>Ćetković, Jasmina ; Knežević, Miloš ; Vujadinović, Radoje ; Tombarević, Esad ; Grujić, Marija</creatorcontrib><description>Wastewater treatment is a process that reduces pollution to those quantities and concentrations at which purified wastewater is no longer a threat to human and animal health and safety and does not cause unwanted changes in the environment. Municipal wastewater is classified as biodegradable water. Special importance should be given to wastewater with a high content of organic matter (COD), phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). MBBR technology, developed on the basis of the conventional activated sludge process and the bio filter process, does not take up much space and does not have problems with activated sludge, as in the case of conventional biological reactors, and has shown good results for the removal of organic matter, phosphorus and nitrogen. The aim of this paper is to optimize the wastewater treatment process in the municipality of Dojran, North Macedonia. Three alternative solutions for improving the capacity for wastewater treatment in the municipality of Dojran were analyzed. The shortlist of variants was made on the basis of several criteria, including: analysis of the system in the tourist season and beyond, assessment of the condition and efficiency of the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in combination with a new treatment plant, treatment efficiency when using different wastewater treatment technologies, the size of the site needed to accommodate the capacity, as well as the financial parameters for the proposed system. The selection of the most favorable solution for the improvement of the wastewater treatment system was made using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. In order to select the optimal solution, a detailed analysis was conducted, considering several decision-making criteria, namely the initial investment, operating costs and management complexity. Based on the obtained results, Variant 3 was recommended, that is, the construction of a completely new station with MBBR technology, with a capacity for 6000 equivalent inhabitants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w15091645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Activated sludge process ; Analysis ; Animal health ; Biodegradation ; Biofilms ; Bioreactors ; Cost control ; Decision making ; Efficiency ; Effluents ; Environmental changes ; Methods ; Multiple criterion ; Municipal wastewater ; Nitrogen ; Nuclear safety ; Operating costs ; Organic chemicals ; Organic matter ; Organic phosphorus ; Performance evaluation ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus removal ; Pollutants ; Pollution control ; Purification ; Reactors ; Sewage ; Sludge ; Technology ; Wastewater purification ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.1645</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4356-0556</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2812746578/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2812746578?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ćetković, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knežević, Miloš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujadinović, Radoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tombarević, Esad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grujić, Marija</creatorcontrib><title>Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Wastewater treatment is a process that reduces pollution to those quantities and concentrations at which purified wastewater is no longer a threat to human and animal health and safety and does not cause unwanted changes in the environment. Municipal wastewater is classified as biodegradable water. Special importance should be given to wastewater with a high content of organic matter (COD), phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). MBBR technology, developed on the basis of the conventional activated sludge process and the bio filter process, does not take up much space and does not have problems with activated sludge, as in the case of conventional biological reactors, and has shown good results for the removal of organic matter, phosphorus and nitrogen. The aim of this paper is to optimize the wastewater treatment process in the municipality of Dojran, North Macedonia. Three alternative solutions for improving the capacity for wastewater treatment in the municipality of Dojran were analyzed. The shortlist of variants was made on the basis of several criteria, including: analysis of the system in the tourist season and beyond, assessment of the condition and efficiency of the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in combination with a new treatment plant, treatment efficiency when using different wastewater treatment technologies, the size of the site needed to accommodate the capacity, as well as the financial parameters for the proposed system. The selection of the most favorable solution for the improvement of the wastewater treatment system was made using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. In order to select the optimal solution, a detailed analysis was conducted, considering several decision-making criteria, namely the initial investment, operating costs and management complexity. Based on the obtained results, Variant 3 was recommended, that is, the construction of a completely new station with MBBR technology, with a capacity for 6000 equivalent inhabitants.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Activated sludge process</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nuclear safety</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Organic chemicals</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic phosphorus</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus removal</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater purification</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaKgaA_-g4AnD1uTze5m463UjwotClYEL0uSnbTRbVKTlNJ_75aKOAPzhuG9N_AQuqRkyJggN1taEkGrojxCZznhLCuKgh7_20_RIMZP0lch6rokZ-jjFTrQyXqHvcHvMibYygQBzwPItAKX8Bz00vnOL3a3eDR5wTNIS99i6_Bs0yWbjYPtBVbiO9A27p1m8su6xQU6MbKLMPjFc_T2cD8fT7Lp8-PTeDTNNGM0ZVqbsmq1IZRparioRKu4aHPFeatJxWipoIZSchCKKsVURRnleaW4pLWoDTtHVwffdfDfG4ip-fSb4PqXTV7TnBdVyeueNTywFrKDxjrjU5C67xZWVnsHxvb3ES_zQvSD9ILrg0AHH2MA06yDXcmwayhp9nE3f3GzH09WcN8</recordid><startdate>20230423</startdate><enddate>20230423</enddate><creator>Ćetković, Jasmina</creator><creator>Knežević, Miloš</creator><creator>Vujadinović, Radoje</creator><creator>Tombarević, Esad</creator><creator>Grujić, Marija</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4356-0556</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230423</creationdate><title>Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making</title><author>Ćetković, Jasmina ; Knežević, Miloš ; Vujadinović, Radoje ; Tombarević, Esad ; Grujić, Marija</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Activated sludge process</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nuclear safety</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Organic chemicals</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic phosphorus</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus removal</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater purification</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ćetković, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knežević, Miloš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujadinović, Radoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tombarević, Esad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grujić, Marija</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ćetković, Jasmina</au><au>Knežević, Miloš</au><au>Vujadinović, Radoje</au><au>Tombarević, Esad</au><au>Grujić, Marija</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-04-23</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1645</spage><pages>1645-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Wastewater treatment is a process that reduces pollution to those quantities and concentrations at which purified wastewater is no longer a threat to human and animal health and safety and does not cause unwanted changes in the environment. Municipal wastewater is classified as biodegradable water. Special importance should be given to wastewater with a high content of organic matter (COD), phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). MBBR technology, developed on the basis of the conventional activated sludge process and the bio filter process, does not take up much space and does not have problems with activated sludge, as in the case of conventional biological reactors, and has shown good results for the removal of organic matter, phosphorus and nitrogen. The aim of this paper is to optimize the wastewater treatment process in the municipality of Dojran, North Macedonia. Three alternative solutions for improving the capacity for wastewater treatment in the municipality of Dojran were analyzed. The shortlist of variants was made on the basis of several criteria, including: analysis of the system in the tourist season and beyond, assessment of the condition and efficiency of the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in combination with a new treatment plant, treatment efficiency when using different wastewater treatment technologies, the size of the site needed to accommodate the capacity, as well as the financial parameters for the proposed system. The selection of the most favorable solution for the improvement of the wastewater treatment system was made using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. In order to select the optimal solution, a detailed analysis was conducted, considering several decision-making criteria, namely the initial investment, operating costs and management complexity. Based on the obtained results, Variant 3 was recommended, that is, the construction of a completely new station with MBBR technology, with a capacity for 6000 equivalent inhabitants.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w15091645</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4356-0556</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.1645 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2812746578 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Activated sludge Activated sludge process Analysis Animal health Biodegradation Biofilms Bioreactors Cost control Decision making Efficiency Effluents Environmental changes Methods Multiple criterion Municipal wastewater Nitrogen Nuclear safety Operating costs Organic chemicals Organic matter Organic phosphorus Performance evaluation Phosphorus Phosphorus removal Pollutants Pollution control Purification Reactors Sewage Sludge Technology Wastewater purification Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water treatment |
title | Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection%20of%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20Technology:%20AHP%20Method%20in%20Multi-Criteria%20Decision%20Making&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=%C4%86etkovi%C4%87,%20Jasmina&rft.date=2023-04-23&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1645&rft.pages=1645-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w15091645&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA752497520%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ccf56dcf013c1f7969db79d2b77dc06315be8e5a7e9b1bb3b6131726b7a1898f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812746578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A752497520&rfr_iscdi=true |