Loading…
AHP-EWM Based Model Selection System for Subsidence Area Research
Coal mining can create a variety of environmental, ecological, and land-use problems. Subsidence areas resulting from coal mining are a common and particularly difficult problem to manage. Despite much discussion in the academic literature as well as among local and international stakeholders, there...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sustainability 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.7135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 7135 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Liang, Ming Yang, Gen Zhu, Xiaojun Cheng, Hua Zheng, Liugen Liu, Hui Dong, Xianglin Zhang, Yanhai |
description | Coal mining can create a variety of environmental, ecological, and land-use problems. Subsidence areas resulting from coal mining are a common and particularly difficult problem to manage. Despite much discussion in the academic literature as well as among local and international stakeholders, there is neither a uniform standard nor a universally accepted approach for selecting an appropriate governance model for a subsidence area. In particular, the lack of quantitative evaluation methods and excessive subjectivity represent key obstacles to the effective selection of governance models for subsidence areas. This paper proposes a selection framework for a coal mining subsidence governance model that integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method (EWM). The model comprehensively considers the settlement characteristics of the subsidence area, its geographic location, the water index, as well as the vegetation index. These variables are used as indicators to develop an evaluation framework upon which different subsidence zones can be quantitatively analyzed. The selection framework is demonstrated using examples from three subsidence areas in the Huainan and Huaibei mining areas in China, for which relevant data were collected and processed with the help of field surveys, remote sensing images, and subsidence prediction software. Applying the novel selection framework, the most suitable governance model for each subsidence area was obtained and determined to be consistent with the recommendations of an academic panel composed of multiple experts. The novel selection framework has high efficacy and potential to overcome the problem of subjectivity in the selection of governance models for coal mining subsidence areas. It is also envisaged that future incorporation of the selection framework into a user-friendly software package will significantly improve the efficiency with which suitable governance models for coal mining subsidence areas are selected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su15097135 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812750075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A749234280</galeid><sourcerecordid>A749234280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQx4MoOOZe_AQFnxQ6L0nTpo91TDfYUFbFx5Cl19nRNTNpwX17KxN0d3B3HL__3cOfkGsKY85TuPcdFZAmlIszMmCQ0JCCgPN_8yUZeb-FPjinKY0HJMtmL-H0fRk8aI9FsLQF1kGONZq2sk2QH3yLu6C0Lsi7ta8KbAwGmUMdrNCjdubjilyUuvY4-u1D8vY4fZ3MwsXz03ySLULDY9mGzJRSpiVCCpzGWDDBNWMJAylLmTIWxVQkgvWVciiElCYq1muthQSMQUR8SG6Od_fOfnboW7W1nWv6l4pJyhIBkIieGh-pja5RVU1pW6dNnwXuKmMbLKt-nyVRynjEJPSC2xNBz7T41W50572a56tT9u7IGme9d1iqvat22h0UBfVjgfqzgH8DJcpzRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812750075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AHP-EWM Based Model Selection System for Subsidence Area Research</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Liang, Ming ; Yang, Gen ; Zhu, Xiaojun ; Cheng, Hua ; Zheng, Liugen ; Liu, Hui ; Dong, Xianglin ; Zhang, Yanhai</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ming ; Yang, Gen ; Zhu, Xiaojun ; Cheng, Hua ; Zheng, Liugen ; Liu, Hui ; Dong, Xianglin ; Zhang, Yanhai</creatorcontrib><description>Coal mining can create a variety of environmental, ecological, and land-use problems. Subsidence areas resulting from coal mining are a common and particularly difficult problem to manage. Despite much discussion in the academic literature as well as among local and international stakeholders, there is neither a uniform standard nor a universally accepted approach for selecting an appropriate governance model for a subsidence area. In particular, the lack of quantitative evaluation methods and excessive subjectivity represent key obstacles to the effective selection of governance models for subsidence areas. This paper proposes a selection framework for a coal mining subsidence governance model that integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method (EWM). The model comprehensively considers the settlement characteristics of the subsidence area, its geographic location, the water index, as well as the vegetation index. These variables are used as indicators to develop an evaluation framework upon which different subsidence zones can be quantitatively analyzed. The selection framework is demonstrated using examples from three subsidence areas in the Huainan and Huaibei mining areas in China, for which relevant data were collected and processed with the help of field surveys, remote sensing images, and subsidence prediction software. Applying the novel selection framework, the most suitable governance model for each subsidence area was obtained and determined to be consistent with the recommendations of an academic panel composed of multiple experts. The novel selection framework has high efficacy and potential to overcome the problem of subjectivity in the selection of governance models for coal mining subsidence areas. It is also envisaged that future incorporation of the selection framework into a user-friendly software package will significantly improve the efficiency with which suitable governance models for coal mining subsidence areas are selected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15097135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Coal ; Coal industry ; Coal mining ; Ecological effects ; Entropy (statistics) ; Environmental impact ; Geographical locations ; International standards ; Land reclamation ; Land use ; Mineral industry ; Mines ; Mining industry ; Quantitative analysis ; Remote sensing ; Software packages ; Subsidence ; Sustainability ; Vegetation ; Weighting methods</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.7135</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8081-7499 ; 0000-0003-1949-7072 ; 0000-0003-1267-2325</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2812750075/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2812750075?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Gen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Liugen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xianglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yanhai</creatorcontrib><title>AHP-EWM Based Model Selection System for Subsidence Area Research</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Coal mining can create a variety of environmental, ecological, and land-use problems. Subsidence areas resulting from coal mining are a common and particularly difficult problem to manage. Despite much discussion in the academic literature as well as among local and international stakeholders, there is neither a uniform standard nor a universally accepted approach for selecting an appropriate governance model for a subsidence area. In particular, the lack of quantitative evaluation methods and excessive subjectivity represent key obstacles to the effective selection of governance models for subsidence areas. This paper proposes a selection framework for a coal mining subsidence governance model that integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method (EWM). The model comprehensively considers the settlement characteristics of the subsidence area, its geographic location, the water index, as well as the vegetation index. These variables are used as indicators to develop an evaluation framework upon which different subsidence zones can be quantitatively analyzed. The selection framework is demonstrated using examples from three subsidence areas in the Huainan and Huaibei mining areas in China, for which relevant data were collected and processed with the help of field surveys, remote sensing images, and subsidence prediction software. Applying the novel selection framework, the most suitable governance model for each subsidence area was obtained and determined to be consistent with the recommendations of an academic panel composed of multiple experts. The novel selection framework has high efficacy and potential to overcome the problem of subjectivity in the selection of governance models for coal mining subsidence areas. It is also envisaged that future incorporation of the selection framework into a user-friendly software package will significantly improve the efficiency with which suitable governance models for coal mining subsidence areas are selected.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal industry</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Entropy (statistics)</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>International standards</subject><subject>Land reclamation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Mineral industry</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Mining industry</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><subject>Subsidence</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Weighting methods</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQx4MoOOZe_AQFnxQ6L0nTpo91TDfYUFbFx5Cl19nRNTNpwX17KxN0d3B3HL__3cOfkGsKY85TuPcdFZAmlIszMmCQ0JCCgPN_8yUZeb-FPjinKY0HJMtmL-H0fRk8aI9FsLQF1kGONZq2sk2QH3yLu6C0Lsi7ta8KbAwGmUMdrNCjdubjilyUuvY4-u1D8vY4fZ3MwsXz03ySLULDY9mGzJRSpiVCCpzGWDDBNWMJAylLmTIWxVQkgvWVciiElCYq1muthQSMQUR8SG6Od_fOfnboW7W1nWv6l4pJyhIBkIieGh-pja5RVU1pW6dNnwXuKmMbLKt-nyVRynjEJPSC2xNBz7T41W50572a56tT9u7IGme9d1iqvat22h0UBfVjgfqzgH8DJcpzRQ</recordid><startdate>20230424</startdate><enddate>20230424</enddate><creator>Liang, Ming</creator><creator>Yang, Gen</creator><creator>Zhu, Xiaojun</creator><creator>Cheng, Hua</creator><creator>Zheng, Liugen</creator><creator>Liu, Hui</creator><creator>Dong, Xianglin</creator><creator>Zhang, Yanhai</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-7499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-7072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-2325</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230424</creationdate><title>AHP-EWM Based Model Selection System for Subsidence Area Research</title><author>Liang, Ming ; Yang, Gen ; Zhu, Xiaojun ; Cheng, Hua ; Zheng, Liugen ; Liu, Hui ; Dong, Xianglin ; Zhang, Yanhai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal industry</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Entropy (statistics)</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>International standards</topic><topic>Land reclamation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Mineral industry</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Mining industry</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><topic>Subsidence</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Weighting methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Gen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Liugen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xianglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yanhai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Ming</au><au>Yang, Gen</au><au>Zhu, Xiaojun</au><au>Cheng, Hua</au><au>Zheng, Liugen</au><au>Liu, Hui</au><au>Dong, Xianglin</au><au>Zhang, Yanhai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AHP-EWM Based Model Selection System for Subsidence Area Research</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-04-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>7135</spage><pages>7135-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Coal mining can create a variety of environmental, ecological, and land-use problems. Subsidence areas resulting from coal mining are a common and particularly difficult problem to manage. Despite much discussion in the academic literature as well as among local and international stakeholders, there is neither a uniform standard nor a universally accepted approach for selecting an appropriate governance model for a subsidence area. In particular, the lack of quantitative evaluation methods and excessive subjectivity represent key obstacles to the effective selection of governance models for subsidence areas. This paper proposes a selection framework for a coal mining subsidence governance model that integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method (EWM). The model comprehensively considers the settlement characteristics of the subsidence area, its geographic location, the water index, as well as the vegetation index. These variables are used as indicators to develop an evaluation framework upon which different subsidence zones can be quantitatively analyzed. The selection framework is demonstrated using examples from three subsidence areas in the Huainan and Huaibei mining areas in China, for which relevant data were collected and processed with the help of field surveys, remote sensing images, and subsidence prediction software. Applying the novel selection framework, the most suitable governance model for each subsidence area was obtained and determined to be consistent with the recommendations of an academic panel composed of multiple experts. The novel selection framework has high efficacy and potential to overcome the problem of subjectivity in the selection of governance models for coal mining subsidence areas. It is also envisaged that future incorporation of the selection framework into a user-friendly software package will significantly improve the efficiency with which suitable governance models for coal mining subsidence areas are selected.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15097135</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-7499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-7072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-2325</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.7135 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2812750075 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Coal Coal industry Coal mining Ecological effects Entropy (statistics) Environmental impact Geographical locations International standards Land reclamation Land use Mineral industry Mines Mining industry Quantitative analysis Remote sensing Software packages Subsidence Sustainability Vegetation Weighting methods |
title | AHP-EWM Based Model Selection System for Subsidence Area Research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AHP-EWM%20Based%20Model%20Selection%20System%20for%20Subsidence%20Area%20Research&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Liang,%20Ming&rft.date=2023-04-24&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=7135&rft.pages=7135-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15097135&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA749234280%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2cf889fe090316ed253a2272088f89224615752615130d588c4dbbaa580e60543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812750075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A749234280&rfr_iscdi=true |