Reply to “Comments on ‘A Simple, Coherent Framework for Partitioning Uncertainty in Climate Predictions’”

To check the robustness of the conclusions in YFSH11 to the choice of data subset, we repeated our original analysis for each of six different subsets corresponding to all possible choices of two runs from the four runs of the Parallel Climate Model (PCM) under scenario B1.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of climate 2013-06, Vol.26 (12), p.4377-4377
Main Authors: Yip, Stan, Ferro, Christopher A.T., Stephenson, David B., Hawkins, Ed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Climate change
Climate models
Climate prediction
CORRESPONDENCE
Design
Design analysis
Frameworks
Modeling
Regression models
Studies
Uncertainty
Variance analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To check the robustness of the conclusions in YFSH11 to the choice of data subset, we repeated our original analysis for each of six different subsets corresponding to all possible choices of two runs from the four runs of the Parallel Climate Model (PCM) under scenario B1.
ISSN:0894-8755
1520-0442
DOI:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00858.1