Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials

Disciplinary differences between mental health and legal discourses limit the implementation of mental health knowledge (MHK) in legal proceedings. This study examined the interchange between these discourses, focusing on sexual assault cases that required testimonies of mental health expert witness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social & legal studies 2023-06, Vol.32 (3), p.441-463
Main Authors: Cohen, Inbar, Gal, Tali, Enosh, Guy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Court hearings & proceedings
Critical theory
Discourse analysis
Discourses
Expert witness testimony
Health information
Litigation
Mental health
Radicalism
Sex crimes
Trials
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-41725fc215b1764f41097d0331d1cffc7a0b8059ab05dee0158a23d47bc5a1083
container_end_page 463
container_issue 3
container_start_page 441
container_title Social & legal studies
container_volume 32
creator Cohen, Inbar
Gal, Tali
Enosh, Guy
description Disciplinary differences between mental health and legal discourses limit the implementation of mental health knowledge (MHK) in legal proceedings. This study examined the interchange between these discourses, focusing on sexual assault cases that required testimonies of mental health expert witnesses (MHEWs) in Israel. 42 multi-perspective interviews including 16 MHEWs and 26 legal practitioners were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. Participants’ statements relayed three depictions of the interchange between mental health and legal discourses: a dichotomized one, which regards both discourses as incompatible; a tactical one, which regards MHK as beneficial when serving legal interests; and a radical one, which regards MHK as imperative to legal discretion, placing therapeutic considerations ahead of legal ones. The study provides a first empirical analysis of the law-mental-health interchange. In particular, it identifies an emerging practice of therapeutic-legal ("theralegal") discretion, which reflects an understanding that legal considerations alone cannot address complex criminal legal issues.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/09646639221117388
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2815179445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09646639221117388</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2815179445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-41725fc215b1764f41097d0331d1cffc7a0b8059ab05dee0158a23d47bc5a1083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAP4GaJc4o3tuOEWymPVipCgnCOnGSTBopTbIfC3-OqSBwQp9HOzsyuhpAzYBMApS5Ylogk4VkcQ5h5mh6QEYgEIsUzdkhGu320ExyTsXNdyTgkkikuRuQ13_b0sde1o7PefKBt8ZLmK6QL49FWK21apFfot4iG-sDfo_F6Teeo135FtanpEttAXHeu6gfr0NHO0Cf8HAI5dU4Pa09z2-m1OyVHTQAc_-AJeb69yWfzaPlwt5hNl1EVJ8JHAlQsmyoGWYJKRCOAZapmnEMNVdNUSrMyZTLTJZM1IgOZ6pjXQpWV1MBSfkLO97kb278P6HzxEj4z4WQRpyBBZULIoIK9qrK9cxabYmO7N22_CmDFrtbiT63BM9l7nG7xN_V_wzelCHY_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2815179445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cohen, Inbar ; Gal, Tali ; Enosh, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Inbar ; Gal, Tali ; Enosh, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>Disciplinary differences between mental health and legal discourses limit the implementation of mental health knowledge (MHK) in legal proceedings. This study examined the interchange between these discourses, focusing on sexual assault cases that required testimonies of mental health expert witnesses (MHEWs) in Israel. 42 multi-perspective interviews including 16 MHEWs and 26 legal practitioners were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. Participants’ statements relayed three depictions of the interchange between mental health and legal discourses: a dichotomized one, which regards both discourses as incompatible; a tactical one, which regards MHK as beneficial when serving legal interests; and a radical one, which regards MHK as imperative to legal discretion, placing therapeutic considerations ahead of legal ones. The study provides a first empirical analysis of the law-mental-health interchange. In particular, it identifies an emerging practice of therapeutic-legal ("theralegal") discretion, which reflects an understanding that legal considerations alone cannot address complex criminal legal issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-6639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09646639221117388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Court hearings &amp; proceedings ; Critical theory ; Discourse analysis ; Discourses ; Expert witness testimony ; Health information ; Litigation ; Mental health ; Radicalism ; Sex crimes ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Social &amp; legal studies, 2023-06, Vol.32 (3), p.441-463</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-41725fc215b1764f41097d0331d1cffc7a0b8059ab05dee0158a23d47bc5a1083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8032-6577</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Inbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gal, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enosh, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials</title><title>Social &amp; legal studies</title><addtitle>Social &amp; Legal Studies</addtitle><description>Disciplinary differences between mental health and legal discourses limit the implementation of mental health knowledge (MHK) in legal proceedings. This study examined the interchange between these discourses, focusing on sexual assault cases that required testimonies of mental health expert witnesses (MHEWs) in Israel. 42 multi-perspective interviews including 16 MHEWs and 26 legal practitioners were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. Participants’ statements relayed three depictions of the interchange between mental health and legal discourses: a dichotomized one, which regards both discourses as incompatible; a tactical one, which regards MHK as beneficial when serving legal interests; and a radical one, which regards MHK as imperative to legal discretion, placing therapeutic considerations ahead of legal ones. The study provides a first empirical analysis of the law-mental-health interchange. In particular, it identifies an emerging practice of therapeutic-legal ("theralegal") discretion, which reflects an understanding that legal considerations alone cannot address complex criminal legal issues.</description><subject>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Expert witness testimony</subject><subject>Health information</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0964-6639</issn><issn>1461-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAP4GaJc4o3tuOEWymPVipCgnCOnGSTBopTbIfC3-OqSBwQp9HOzsyuhpAzYBMApS5Ylogk4VkcQ5h5mh6QEYgEIsUzdkhGu320ExyTsXNdyTgkkikuRuQ13_b0sde1o7PefKBt8ZLmK6QL49FWK21apFfot4iG-sDfo_F6Teeo135FtanpEttAXHeu6gfr0NHO0Cf8HAI5dU4Pa09z2-m1OyVHTQAc_-AJeb69yWfzaPlwt5hNl1EVJ8JHAlQsmyoGWYJKRCOAZapmnEMNVdNUSrMyZTLTJZM1IgOZ6pjXQpWV1MBSfkLO97kb278P6HzxEj4z4WQRpyBBZULIoIK9qrK9cxabYmO7N22_CmDFrtbiT63BM9l7nG7xN_V_wzelCHY_</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Cohen, Inbar</creator><creator>Gal, Tali</creator><creator>Enosh, Guy</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-6577</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials</title><author>Cohen, Inbar ; Gal, Tali ; Enosh, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-41725fc215b1764f41097d0331d1cffc7a0b8059ab05dee0158a23d47bc5a1083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Expert witness testimony</topic><topic>Health information</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Inbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gal, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enosh, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social &amp; legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Inbar</au><au>Gal, Tali</au><au>Enosh, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials</atitle><jtitle>Social &amp; legal studies</jtitle><addtitle>Social &amp; Legal Studies</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>463</epage><pages>441-463</pages><issn>0964-6639</issn><eissn>1461-7390</eissn><abstract>Disciplinary differences between mental health and legal discourses limit the implementation of mental health knowledge (MHK) in legal proceedings. This study examined the interchange between these discourses, focusing on sexual assault cases that required testimonies of mental health expert witnesses (MHEWs) in Israel. 42 multi-perspective interviews including 16 MHEWs and 26 legal practitioners were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. Participants’ statements relayed three depictions of the interchange between mental health and legal discourses: a dichotomized one, which regards both discourses as incompatible; a tactical one, which regards MHK as beneficial when serving legal interests; and a radical one, which regards MHK as imperative to legal discretion, placing therapeutic considerations ahead of legal ones. The study provides a first empirical analysis of the law-mental-health interchange. In particular, it identifies an emerging practice of therapeutic-legal ("theralegal") discretion, which reflects an understanding that legal considerations alone cannot address complex criminal legal issues.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09646639221117388</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-6577</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-6639
ispartof Social & legal studies, 2023-06, Vol.32 (3), p.441-463
issn 0964-6639
1461-7390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2815179445
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Court hearings & proceedings
Critical theory
Discourse analysis
Discourses
Expert witness testimony
Health information
Litigation
Mental health
Radicalism
Sex crimes
Trials
title Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Roads%20Converge:%20The%20Interchange%20Between%20the%20Mental%20Health%20and%20Legal%20Discourses%20in%20Sexual%20Assault%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Social%20&%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Cohen,%20Inbar&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=463&rft.pages=441-463&rft.issn=0964-6639&rft.eissn=1461-7390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09646639221117388&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2815179445%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-41725fc215b1764f41097d0331d1cffc7a0b8059ab05dee0158a23d47bc5a1083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2815179445&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09646639221117388&rfr_iscdi=true