Interdisciplinary collaborative working on surgical ward rounds: reality or rhetoric? A systematic review

• Published in: Journal of interprofessional care 2023-07, Vol.37 (4), p.674-688
• Main Authors: Morris, Marie, Mulhall, Claire, Murphy, Paul J., Eppich, Walter J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abstracts; Allied health professionals; Clinical outcomes; Collaboration; collective learning; Continuity of care; High risk; Humans; Intention; Interdisciplinary; Interdisciplinary aspects; interdisciplinary practice; Interdisciplinary research; Interprofessional Relations; Literature reviews; Medical conditions; Medical personnel; Medical screening; Multidisciplinary teams; Patient communication; Patient safety; Patients; Pediatrics; Physicians; Postoperative care; Retrieval; Rhetoric; Rounds; Surgery; surgical ward round; Surgical wards; Systematic review; Teaching Rounds; Teams; Wards
• ISSN: 1356-1820; 1469-9567
• DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2115023

Daily surgical ward rounds shape the quality of postoperative care and contribute to positive patient outcomes. Despite their importance, strategies to facilitate and promote deliberate interdisciplinary collaboration within surgical ward rounds have not been comprehensively investigated. This paper systematically reviews the literature to identify what is known from existing publications about interdisciplinary working on surgical ward rounds. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception until May 2021 for studies involving interdisciplinary surgical ward rounds. Also, journal hand searches were undertaken. All potential abstracts and papers were screened independently by two reviewers to determine inclusion. All included papers were assessed for methodological quality using the accepted quality criteria outlined in the BEME No. 1 guide. A modified Kirkpatrick model was employed to analyze and synthesize the included studies. The search identified 1765 studies. Reviews of 861 abstracts resulted in the retrieval of 124 articles for full-text screening. Thirty-two papers met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The levels of research evidence were low with 11 papers scoring either grade 4 (results are clear and very likely to be true) or grade 5 (results are unequivocal) in accordance with the BEME No. 1 guide. These 11 studies had three foci (1) full teams managing specific medical conditions through deliberate interdisciplinary collaboration on ward rounds (n = 5); (2) suggestions on the best format for interdisciplinary collaboration on ward rounds (n = 3); and, (3) the roles of specific disciplines in a collaborative surgical round (n = 3). Physicians, intensivists, and pediatricians embrace the benefits of interdisciplinary working to facilitate the improvement of communication, collaboration, and patient safety. Yet, persistent hierarchies within surgical wards act as a barrier often preventing allied health professionals from speaking up, thus perpetuating intra disciplinary siloed behaviors. This barrier contributes to a dearth of research evidence to facilitate interdisciplinary collaborative intentionality in surgical ward rounds and surgical education. Given the high-risk nature of surgery, interdisciplinary collaboration is a critical component for patient safety. Our findings serve as a call to action to address the rhetoric of interdisciplinary collaboration on surgical ward rounds. An evidence-base is