Loading…
A tiny cuckoo: Risk‐dependent interspecific brood parasitism in a predatory mite
Many animal species protect their eggs against predators, and other species may profit from this by adding their eggs to those of the protecting species. We studied two tiny species of predatory mites that share a food source, are engaged in intraguild predation, and which eggs are attacked by the s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Functional ecology 2023-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1594-1603 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3 |
container_end_page | 1603 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1594 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Choh, Yasuyuki Janssen, Arne |
description | Many animal species protect their eggs against predators, and other species may profit from this by adding their eggs to those of the protecting species.
We studied two tiny species of predatory mites that share a food source, are engaged in intraguild predation, and which eggs are attacked by the same egg predator.
One of these predatory mites (Neoseiulus californicus) adds its eggs to those of the other species (Gynaeseius liturivorus) which guards its eggs from egg predators, resulting in reduced predation of the eggs of the nonguarding species. The guarding species experiences costs in the form of intraguild predation of her offspring, and the addition of eggs to the guarding species therefore qualifies as brood parasitism.
In the presence of egg predators, the brood parasite preferentially adds its eggs to those of the guarding host species, not to those of another, nonguarding mite species.
This cuckoo behaviour comes with a cost for the parasite when egg predators are absent, and therefore only occurs when egg predators are present.
Our findings emphasize the importance of the risk of egg predation as a factor driving facultative brood parasitism.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.14332 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2822936220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2822936220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnrwHP2-Zjsx_eSmlVKAil95AmE0g_NmuyRfbmT_A3-ktMXfHqXAbmfd-Z4UHonpIJTTWlvBAZy7mY0JxzdoFGf5NLNCKsqLMqL_g1uolxRwipBWMjtJ7hzjU91ie99_4Rr13cf318GmihMdB02DUdhNiCdtZpvA3eG9yqoKLrXDwmGSvcBjCq86HHR9fBLbqy6hDh7reP0Wa52Myfs9Xr08t8tso0p4JlnNa6VCS3hOYUSq6qqq6MtYURSeFCCwE5bE0tgKdvS82L0lBtam1zXVk-Rg_D2jb4txPETu78KTTpomQVYzUvGCPJNR1cOvgYA1jZBndUoZeUyDM3eaYkz5TkD7eUEEPi3R2g_88ul4v5kPsGy6pv4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822936220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tiny cuckoo: Risk‐dependent interspecific brood parasitism in a predatory mite</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Choh, Yasuyuki ; Janssen, Arne</creator><creatorcontrib>Choh, Yasuyuki ; Janssen, Arne</creatorcontrib><description>Many animal species protect their eggs against predators, and other species may profit from this by adding their eggs to those of the protecting species.
We studied two tiny species of predatory mites that share a food source, are engaged in intraguild predation, and which eggs are attacked by the same egg predator.
One of these predatory mites (Neoseiulus californicus) adds its eggs to those of the other species (Gynaeseius liturivorus) which guards its eggs from egg predators, resulting in reduced predation of the eggs of the nonguarding species. The guarding species experiences costs in the form of intraguild predation of her offspring, and the addition of eggs to the guarding species therefore qualifies as brood parasitism.
In the presence of egg predators, the brood parasite preferentially adds its eggs to those of the guarding host species, not to those of another, nonguarding mite species.
This cuckoo behaviour comes with a cost for the parasite when egg predators are absent, and therefore only occurs when egg predators are present.
Our findings emphasize the importance of the risk of egg predation as a factor driving facultative brood parasitism.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal species ; antipredator behaviour ; Brood parasitism ; Ectoparasites ; egg predation ; Eggs ; Food sources ; Guards ; intraguild predation ; maternal care ; Mites ; Offspring ; Parasitism ; Predation ; Predators ; Protected species ; Species ; species recognition</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2023-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1594-1603</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2023 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2023 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9431-9722 ; 0000-0001-5075-5303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choh, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Arne</creatorcontrib><title>A tiny cuckoo: Risk‐dependent interspecific brood parasitism in a predatory mite</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Many animal species protect their eggs against predators, and other species may profit from this by adding their eggs to those of the protecting species.
We studied two tiny species of predatory mites that share a food source, are engaged in intraguild predation, and which eggs are attacked by the same egg predator.
One of these predatory mites (Neoseiulus californicus) adds its eggs to those of the other species (Gynaeseius liturivorus) which guards its eggs from egg predators, resulting in reduced predation of the eggs of the nonguarding species. The guarding species experiences costs in the form of intraguild predation of her offspring, and the addition of eggs to the guarding species therefore qualifies as brood parasitism.
In the presence of egg predators, the brood parasite preferentially adds its eggs to those of the guarding host species, not to those of another, nonguarding mite species.
This cuckoo behaviour comes with a cost for the parasite when egg predators are absent, and therefore only occurs when egg predators are present.
Our findings emphasize the importance of the risk of egg predation as a factor driving facultative brood parasitism.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>antipredator behaviour</subject><subject>Brood parasitism</subject><subject>Ectoparasites</subject><subject>egg predation</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Guards</subject><subject>intraguild predation</subject><subject>maternal care</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species recognition</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnrwHP2-Zjsx_eSmlVKAil95AmE0g_NmuyRfbmT_A3-ktMXfHqXAbmfd-Z4UHonpIJTTWlvBAZy7mY0JxzdoFGf5NLNCKsqLMqL_g1uolxRwipBWMjtJ7hzjU91ie99_4Rr13cf318GmihMdB02DUdhNiCdtZpvA3eG9yqoKLrXDwmGSvcBjCq86HHR9fBLbqy6hDh7reP0Wa52Myfs9Xr08t8tso0p4JlnNa6VCS3hOYUSq6qqq6MtYURSeFCCwE5bE0tgKdvS82L0lBtam1zXVk-Rg_D2jb4txPETu78KTTpomQVYzUvGCPJNR1cOvgYA1jZBndUoZeUyDM3eaYkz5TkD7eUEEPi3R2g_88ul4v5kPsGy6pv4Q</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Choh, Yasuyuki</creator><creator>Janssen, Arne</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-9722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-5303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>A tiny cuckoo: Risk‐dependent interspecific brood parasitism in a predatory mite</title><author>Choh, Yasuyuki ; Janssen, Arne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>antipredator behaviour</topic><topic>Brood parasitism</topic><topic>Ectoparasites</topic><topic>egg predation</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Guards</topic><topic>intraguild predation</topic><topic>maternal care</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choh, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Arne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choh, Yasuyuki</au><au>Janssen, Arne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tiny cuckoo: Risk‐dependent interspecific brood parasitism in a predatory mite</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1594</spage><epage>1603</epage><pages>1594-1603</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Many animal species protect their eggs against predators, and other species may profit from this by adding their eggs to those of the protecting species.
We studied two tiny species of predatory mites that share a food source, are engaged in intraguild predation, and which eggs are attacked by the same egg predator.
One of these predatory mites (Neoseiulus californicus) adds its eggs to those of the other species (Gynaeseius liturivorus) which guards its eggs from egg predators, resulting in reduced predation of the eggs of the nonguarding species. The guarding species experiences costs in the form of intraguild predation of her offspring, and the addition of eggs to the guarding species therefore qualifies as brood parasitism.
In the presence of egg predators, the brood parasite preferentially adds its eggs to those of the guarding host species, not to those of another, nonguarding mite species.
This cuckoo behaviour comes with a cost for the parasite when egg predators are absent, and therefore only occurs when egg predators are present.
Our findings emphasize the importance of the risk of egg predation as a factor driving facultative brood parasitism.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.14332</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-9722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-5303</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2023-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1594-1603 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2822936220 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Animal species antipredator behaviour Brood parasitism Ectoparasites egg predation Eggs Food sources Guards intraguild predation maternal care Mites Offspring Parasitism Predation Predators Protected species Species species recognition |
title | A tiny cuckoo: Risk‐dependent interspecific brood parasitism in a predatory mite |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A39%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tiny%20cuckoo:%20Risk%E2%80%90dependent%20interspecific%20brood%20parasitism%20in%20a%20predatory%20mite&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Choh,%20Yasuyuki&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1594&rft.epage=1603&rft.pages=1594-1603&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.14332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2822936220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-319c7a04f0141e73a8898dff6d519c35c55e4ebd95e30097c367d1cd9cf4c8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822936220&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |