Loading…
Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review
Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2023-06, Vol.58 (6), p.2454-2472 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343 |
container_end_page | 2472 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2454 |
container_title | Geological journal (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Zhang, Ran Hao, Guangbo Zhang, Kong Li, Zili |
description | Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers & professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition.
Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/gj.4763 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2823487246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2823487246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWABw-yNV_7EW9FtCoFPdhzyGYna5Zttia7Lf33bq1XT-_APMzAi9A1JTNKCLuvm5nIM36CJpRImVDCxSmaEJKzcU7JObqIsSGEUiLoBH2s_Fp7DxXWEJxu8Ra-nGkBe711te5d57HzePAVhDp0Y-LYh8H0Q4BxETdgDuYBz3GArYPdJTqzuo1w9ZdTtHp--nx8SZbvi9fH-TIxnDGelExay5m2PKNgZMqqvLCyrBhnWWqKFLSutCi4tJqlhalKYstKyExqKYnhgk_RzfHuJnTfA8ReNd0Q_PhSsYJxUeRMZKO6PSoTuhgDWLUJbq3DXlGiDnWpulGHukZ5d5Q718L-P6YWb7_6B7BWawg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823487246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Ran ; Hao, Guangbo ; Zhang, Kong ; Li, Zili</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ran ; Hao, Guangbo ; Zhang, Kong ; Li, Zili</creatorcontrib><description>Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers & professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition.
Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.4763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Aerial surveys ; Algorithms ; Angles (geometry) ; Caves ; Computer vision ; Feature recognition ; Geologists ; Geotechnical engineering ; Global navigation satellite system ; Image acquisition ; Inspection ; Interdisciplinary research ; Lidar ; Localization ; Mathematics ; Navigation ; Navigational satellites ; Obstacle avoidance ; Operating costs ; Structural health monitoring ; structural inspection ; Tunnels ; Underground caverns ; underground environment ; Underground structures ; unmanned aerial vehicle ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2023-06, Vol.58 (6), p.2454-2472</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7570-0392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Guangbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zili</creatorcontrib><title>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers & professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition.
Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Aerial surveys</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Angles (geometry)</subject><subject>Caves</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Feature recognition</subject><subject>Geologists</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigational satellites</subject><subject>Obstacle avoidance</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Structural health monitoring</subject><subject>structural inspection</subject><subject>Tunnels</subject><subject>Underground caverns</subject><subject>underground environment</subject><subject>Underground structures</subject><subject>unmanned aerial vehicle</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWABw-yNV_7EW9FtCoFPdhzyGYna5Zttia7Lf33bq1XT-_APMzAi9A1JTNKCLuvm5nIM36CJpRImVDCxSmaEJKzcU7JObqIsSGEUiLoBH2s_Fp7DxXWEJxu8Ra-nGkBe711te5d57HzePAVhDp0Y-LYh8H0Q4BxETdgDuYBz3GArYPdJTqzuo1w9ZdTtHp--nx8SZbvi9fH-TIxnDGelExay5m2PKNgZMqqvLCyrBhnWWqKFLSutCi4tJqlhalKYstKyExqKYnhgk_RzfHuJnTfA8ReNd0Q_PhSsYJxUeRMZKO6PSoTuhgDWLUJbq3DXlGiDnWpulGHukZ5d5Q718L-P6YWb7_6B7BWawg</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ran</creator><creator>Hao, Guangbo</creator><creator>Zhang, Kong</creator><creator>Li, Zili</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-0392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</title><author>Zhang, Ran ; Hao, Guangbo ; Zhang, Kong ; Li, Zili</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Aerial surveys</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Angles (geometry)</topic><topic>Caves</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Feature recognition</topic><topic>Geologists</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigational satellites</topic><topic>Obstacle avoidance</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Structural health monitoring</topic><topic>structural inspection</topic><topic>Tunnels</topic><topic>Underground caverns</topic><topic>underground environment</topic><topic>Underground structures</topic><topic>unmanned aerial vehicle</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Guangbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zili</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ran</au><au>Hao, Guangbo</au><au>Zhang, Kong</au><au>Li, Zili</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2454</spage><epage>2472</epage><pages>2454-2472</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers & professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition.
Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.4763</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-0392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0072-1050 |
ispartof | Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2023-06, Vol.58 (6), p.2454-2472 |
issn | 0072-1050 1099-1034 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2823487246 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adaptability Aerial surveys Algorithms Angles (geometry) Caves Computer vision Feature recognition Geologists Geotechnical engineering Global navigation satellite system Image acquisition Inspection Interdisciplinary research Lidar Localization Mathematics Navigation Navigational satellites Obstacle avoidance Operating costs Structural health monitoring structural inspection Tunnels Underground caverns underground environment Underground structures unmanned aerial vehicle Unmanned aerial vehicles Working conditions |
title | Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unmanned%20aerial%20vehicle%20navigation%20in%20underground%20structure%20inspection:%20A%20review&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ran&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2454&rft.epage=2472&rft.pages=2454-2472&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.4763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2823487246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823487246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |