Loading…

Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review

Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2023-06, Vol.58 (6), p.2454-2472
Main Authors: Zhang, Ran, Hao, Guangbo, Zhang, Kong, Li, Zili
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343
container_end_page 2472
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2454
container_title Geological journal (Chichester, England)
container_volume 58
creator Zhang, Ran
Hao, Guangbo
Zhang, Kong
Li, Zili
description Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers & professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition. Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gj.4763
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2823487246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2823487246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWABw-yNV_7EW9FtCoFPdhzyGYna5Zttia7Lf33bq1XT-_APMzAi9A1JTNKCLuvm5nIM36CJpRImVDCxSmaEJKzcU7JObqIsSGEUiLoBH2s_Fp7DxXWEJxu8Ra-nGkBe711te5d57HzePAVhDp0Y-LYh8H0Q4BxETdgDuYBz3GArYPdJTqzuo1w9ZdTtHp--nx8SZbvi9fH-TIxnDGelExay5m2PKNgZMqqvLCyrBhnWWqKFLSutCi4tJqlhalKYstKyExqKYnhgk_RzfHuJnTfA8ReNd0Q_PhSsYJxUeRMZKO6PSoTuhgDWLUJbq3DXlGiDnWpulGHukZ5d5Q718L-P6YWb7_6B7BWawg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823487246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Ran ; Hao, Guangbo ; Zhang, Kong ; Li, Zili</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ran ; Hao, Guangbo ; Zhang, Kong ; Li, Zili</creatorcontrib><description>Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers &amp; professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition. Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.4763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Aerial surveys ; Algorithms ; Angles (geometry) ; Caves ; Computer vision ; Feature recognition ; Geologists ; Geotechnical engineering ; Global navigation satellite system ; Image acquisition ; Inspection ; Interdisciplinary research ; Lidar ; Localization ; Mathematics ; Navigation ; Navigational satellites ; Obstacle avoidance ; Operating costs ; Structural health monitoring ; structural inspection ; Tunnels ; Underground caverns ; underground environment ; Underground structures ; unmanned aerial vehicle ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2023-06, Vol.58 (6), p.2454-2472</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7570-0392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Guangbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zili</creatorcontrib><title>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers &amp; professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition. Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Aerial surveys</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Angles (geometry)</subject><subject>Caves</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Feature recognition</subject><subject>Geologists</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigational satellites</subject><subject>Obstacle avoidance</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Structural health monitoring</subject><subject>structural inspection</subject><subject>Tunnels</subject><subject>Underground caverns</subject><subject>underground environment</subject><subject>Underground structures</subject><subject>unmanned aerial vehicle</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWABw-yNV_7EW9FtCoFPdhzyGYna5Zttia7Lf33bq1XT-_APMzAi9A1JTNKCLuvm5nIM36CJpRImVDCxSmaEJKzcU7JObqIsSGEUiLoBH2s_Fp7DxXWEJxu8Ra-nGkBe711te5d57HzePAVhDp0Y-LYh8H0Q4BxETdgDuYBz3GArYPdJTqzuo1w9ZdTtHp--nx8SZbvi9fH-TIxnDGelExay5m2PKNgZMqqvLCyrBhnWWqKFLSutCi4tJqlhalKYstKyExqKYnhgk_RzfHuJnTfA8ReNd0Q_PhSsYJxUeRMZKO6PSoTuhgDWLUJbq3DXlGiDnWpulGHukZ5d5Q718L-P6YWb7_6B7BWawg</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ran</creator><creator>Hao, Guangbo</creator><creator>Zhang, Kong</creator><creator>Li, Zili</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-0392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</title><author>Zhang, Ran ; Hao, Guangbo ; Zhang, Kong ; Li, Zili</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Aerial surveys</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Angles (geometry)</topic><topic>Caves</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Feature recognition</topic><topic>Geologists</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigational satellites</topic><topic>Obstacle avoidance</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Structural health monitoring</topic><topic>structural inspection</topic><topic>Tunnels</topic><topic>Underground caverns</topic><topic>underground environment</topic><topic>Underground structures</topic><topic>unmanned aerial vehicle</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Guangbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zili</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ran</au><au>Hao, Guangbo</au><au>Zhang, Kong</au><au>Li, Zili</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2454</spage><epage>2472</epage><pages>2454-2472</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>Many years after construction, a number of existing old tunnels and underground structures are deteriorating with time as evidenced by cracks, large deformations, water leakage and so forth, which usually require regular site inspections to record their structural deterioration by taking high‐pixel, high‐overlap images along miles of a tunnel network. For complex underground structures (e.g., long tunnels and large caves), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be adaptive in acquiring images at multiple heights and angles with low operational costs. So far, UAV underground structural health monitoring has become mature for open‐air surveying with rapid developments in robotic software and hardware. However, the UAV image acquisition for underground working conditions still faces a number of key challenges. This paper aims to provide an overview of UAV navigation techniques in confined dark spaces for geotechnical engineers, geologists, drone developers and other interdisciplinary researchers &amp; professionals in the structural health monitoring field. It specifies the challenges for UAV application in underground space, mainly including lack of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, poor lighting conditions, weak features and obstacle avoidance and then followed by strategic solutions. For example, in light of poor GNSS signals, the fusion of multi‐sensors (e.g., laser imaging, detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multi‐cameras) can enhance localization accuracy in low‐luminance underground conditions. To address obstacle avoidance, computer vision (CV)‐based navigation algorithms (e.g., deep reinforced learning [DRL]) enable effective navigation in complex 3D spaces, but their adaptability is limited by arithmetic power and pre‐training needs. The review of relevant previous studies concludes that further development for UAVs in underground space inspection may focus on operation in large‐scale geometric inspection environments, obstacle avoidance, features and semantic recognition. Drone underground operation faces four main challenges: the lack of GPS signal, visible light and obvious textures on structure surfaces and turbulent air. To this end, an overview presents current solutions for UAVs navigation under similar working conditions like mines, tunnels and other indoor structures.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.4763</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-0392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0072-1050
ispartof Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2023-06, Vol.58 (6), p.2454-2472
issn 0072-1050
1099-1034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2823487246
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adaptability
Aerial surveys
Algorithms
Angles (geometry)
Caves
Computer vision
Feature recognition
Geologists
Geotechnical engineering
Global navigation satellite system
Image acquisition
Inspection
Interdisciplinary research
Lidar
Localization
Mathematics
Navigation
Navigational satellites
Obstacle avoidance
Operating costs
Structural health monitoring
structural inspection
Tunnels
Underground caverns
underground environment
Underground structures
unmanned aerial vehicle
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Working conditions
title Unmanned aerial vehicle navigation in underground structure inspection: A review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unmanned%20aerial%20vehicle%20navigation%20in%20underground%20structure%20inspection:%20A%20review&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ran&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2454&rft.epage=2472&rft.pages=2454-2472&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.4763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2823487246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3223-b29ff32af361ec952d78f9bd23265c85eaada4839fa258cdb0fbd4969a990c343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823487246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true