Loading…

Performance Evaluation of Two FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS

Abstract Introduction/Objective The increased number of deaths caused by Fentanyl in recent years created the need for accurate, automated assays for fentanyl detection. Many products have been brought to market but there is concern over the sensitivity and specificity of the available immunoassays....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of clinical pathology 2022-11, Vol.158 (Supplement_1), p.S45-S46
Main Authors: Militello, L, Zhang, V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S46
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page S45
container_title American journal of clinical pathology
container_volume 158
creator Militello, L
Zhang, V
description Abstract Introduction/Objective The increased number of deaths caused by Fentanyl in recent years created the need for accurate, automated assays for fentanyl detection. Many products have been brought to market but there is concern over the sensitivity and specificity of the available immunoassays. Here we evaluate the performance of our current assay, the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK), against the newly FDA-approved Fentanyl Immunoassay for Roche Cobas (Roche), using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the gold standard. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the performance of the Roche fentanyl immunoassay. Methods/Case Report We collected discarded patient urine samples screened for fentanyl using ARK over 3 months to get a total of 100 positive and 100 negative results. All samples were stored at -20 °C and later tested again using ARK, Roche and in-house LC-MS/MS assays. Both immunoassays were performed on Roche Cobas c501 chemistry analyzer. In-house LC-MS/MS assay gave quantitative measurements for both fentanyl and norfentanyl with a limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL for both. Samples with results above 1 ng/mL of either analyte were considered positive for the presence of fentanyl. The upper limit of quantification of the LC-MS/MS assay was 2000 ng/mL. The results obtained from LC-MS/MS were considered as reference values to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the immunoassays, which were calculated by dividing the number of positive and negative samples correctly identified by immunoassay by total positive and negative samples based on LC-MS/MS results, respectively. ARK is designed to detect fentanyl with a cutoff of 1 ng/mL. Roche is designed to detect norfentanyl with a cutoff of 5 ng/mL. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Analytical sensitivity and specificity were 91.9% and 99.3% for ARK and 96.8 and 98.6% for Roche. Fentanyl and norfentanyl levels by LC-MS/MS ranged from 2000 ng/mL with a mean of 57 and 232 and standard deviation of 235 and 578, respectively. False positives were seen in 1 sample for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. False negatives were seen in 5 samples for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. Roche accurately identified 6 positive samples that had norfentanyl concentrations less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating a potential greater sensitivity than stated. Conclusion Both immunoassays performed reasonably well, showing great specificity. Roche displayed greater sensitivity
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcp/aqac126.088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2823835681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ajcp/aqac126.088</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2823835681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1478-9cb5381e27e8633dedd54a8d568927cddaa71955e41536d487d94fb468595f9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PAjEURRujiYjuXTZxaQb6OW2XBEVJIGrAdfOYdgyEmQ4tg-HfOwT2rt7m3HtfDkKPlAwoMXwIm6IZwg4KyvIB0foK9agRPFOKsWvUI4SwzFDFb9FdShtCKNNE9NDXp49liBXUhcevB9i2sF-HGocSL38DnryMslHTxHDwDk98vYf6uMXTqmrrACnBMWH4gXWd9ng2zuaL4Xxxj25K2Cb_cLl99D15XY7fs9nH23Q8mmUFFUpnplhJrqlnyuucc-edkwK0k7k2TBXOAShqpPSCSp47oZUzolyJXEsjS-N4Hz2de7vvdq1Pe7sJbay7Scs045p3TbSjyJkqYkgp-tI2cV1BPFpK7EmcPYmzF3G2E9dFns-R0Db_039y2m_S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823835681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Evaluation of Two FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Militello, L ; Zhang, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Militello, L ; Zhang, V</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction/Objective The increased number of deaths caused by Fentanyl in recent years created the need for accurate, automated assays for fentanyl detection. Many products have been brought to market but there is concern over the sensitivity and specificity of the available immunoassays. Here we evaluate the performance of our current assay, the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK), against the newly FDA-approved Fentanyl Immunoassay for Roche Cobas (Roche), using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the gold standard. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the performance of the Roche fentanyl immunoassay. Methods/Case Report We collected discarded patient urine samples screened for fentanyl using ARK over 3 months to get a total of 100 positive and 100 negative results. All samples were stored at -20 °C and later tested again using ARK, Roche and in-house LC-MS/MS assays. Both immunoassays were performed on Roche Cobas c501 chemistry analyzer. In-house LC-MS/MS assay gave quantitative measurements for both fentanyl and norfentanyl with a limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL for both. Samples with results above 1 ng/mL of either analyte were considered positive for the presence of fentanyl. The upper limit of quantification of the LC-MS/MS assay was 2000 ng/mL. The results obtained from LC-MS/MS were considered as reference values to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the immunoassays, which were calculated by dividing the number of positive and negative samples correctly identified by immunoassay by total positive and negative samples based on LC-MS/MS results, respectively. ARK is designed to detect fentanyl with a cutoff of 1 ng/mL. Roche is designed to detect norfentanyl with a cutoff of 5 ng/mL. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Analytical sensitivity and specificity were 91.9% and 99.3% for ARK and 96.8 and 98.6% for Roche. Fentanyl and norfentanyl levels by LC-MS/MS ranged from &lt;1 to &gt;2000 ng/mL with a mean of 57 and 232 and standard deviation of 235 and 578, respectively. False positives were seen in 1 sample for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. False negatives were seen in 5 samples for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. Roche accurately identified 6 positive samples that had norfentanyl concentrations less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating a potential greater sensitivity than stated. Conclusion Both immunoassays performed reasonably well, showing great specificity. Roche displayed greater sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac126.088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Fentanyl ; Immunoassay ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectroscopy ; Performance evaluation</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical pathology, 2022-11, Vol.158 (Supplement_1), p.S45-S46</ispartof><rights>American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><rights>American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Militello, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, V</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Evaluation of Two FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS</title><title>American journal of clinical pathology</title><description>Abstract Introduction/Objective The increased number of deaths caused by Fentanyl in recent years created the need for accurate, automated assays for fentanyl detection. Many products have been brought to market but there is concern over the sensitivity and specificity of the available immunoassays. Here we evaluate the performance of our current assay, the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK), against the newly FDA-approved Fentanyl Immunoassay for Roche Cobas (Roche), using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the gold standard. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the performance of the Roche fentanyl immunoassay. Methods/Case Report We collected discarded patient urine samples screened for fentanyl using ARK over 3 months to get a total of 100 positive and 100 negative results. All samples were stored at -20 °C and later tested again using ARK, Roche and in-house LC-MS/MS assays. Both immunoassays were performed on Roche Cobas c501 chemistry analyzer. In-house LC-MS/MS assay gave quantitative measurements for both fentanyl and norfentanyl with a limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL for both. Samples with results above 1 ng/mL of either analyte were considered positive for the presence of fentanyl. The upper limit of quantification of the LC-MS/MS assay was 2000 ng/mL. The results obtained from LC-MS/MS were considered as reference values to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the immunoassays, which were calculated by dividing the number of positive and negative samples correctly identified by immunoassay by total positive and negative samples based on LC-MS/MS results, respectively. ARK is designed to detect fentanyl with a cutoff of 1 ng/mL. Roche is designed to detect norfentanyl with a cutoff of 5 ng/mL. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Analytical sensitivity and specificity were 91.9% and 99.3% for ARK and 96.8 and 98.6% for Roche. Fentanyl and norfentanyl levels by LC-MS/MS ranged from &lt;1 to &gt;2000 ng/mL with a mean of 57 and 232 and standard deviation of 235 and 578, respectively. False positives were seen in 1 sample for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. False negatives were seen in 5 samples for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. Roche accurately identified 6 positive samples that had norfentanyl concentrations less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating a potential greater sensitivity than stated. Conclusion Both immunoassays performed reasonably well, showing great specificity. Roche displayed greater sensitivity.</description><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><issn>0002-9173</issn><issn>1943-7722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PAjEURRujiYjuXTZxaQb6OW2XBEVJIGrAdfOYdgyEmQ4tg-HfOwT2rt7m3HtfDkKPlAwoMXwIm6IZwg4KyvIB0foK9agRPFOKsWvUI4SwzFDFb9FdShtCKNNE9NDXp49liBXUhcevB9i2sF-HGocSL38DnryMslHTxHDwDk98vYf6uMXTqmrrACnBMWH4gXWd9ng2zuaL4Xxxj25K2Cb_cLl99D15XY7fs9nH23Q8mmUFFUpnplhJrqlnyuucc-edkwK0k7k2TBXOAShqpPSCSp47oZUzolyJXEsjS-N4Hz2de7vvdq1Pe7sJbay7Scs045p3TbSjyJkqYkgp-tI2cV1BPFpK7EmcPYmzF3G2E9dFns-R0Db_039y2m_S</recordid><startdate>20221109</startdate><enddate>20221109</enddate><creator>Militello, L</creator><creator>Zhang, V</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221109</creationdate><title>Performance Evaluation of Two FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS</title><author>Militello, L ; Zhang, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1478-9cb5381e27e8633dedd54a8d568927cddaa71955e41536d487d94fb468595f9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Militello, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Militello, L</au><au>Zhang, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Evaluation of Two FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><date>2022-11-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>S45</spage><epage>S46</epage><pages>S45-S46</pages><issn>0002-9173</issn><eissn>1943-7722</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction/Objective The increased number of deaths caused by Fentanyl in recent years created the need for accurate, automated assays for fentanyl detection. Many products have been brought to market but there is concern over the sensitivity and specificity of the available immunoassays. Here we evaluate the performance of our current assay, the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK), against the newly FDA-approved Fentanyl Immunoassay for Roche Cobas (Roche), using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the gold standard. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the performance of the Roche fentanyl immunoassay. Methods/Case Report We collected discarded patient urine samples screened for fentanyl using ARK over 3 months to get a total of 100 positive and 100 negative results. All samples were stored at -20 °C and later tested again using ARK, Roche and in-house LC-MS/MS assays. Both immunoassays were performed on Roche Cobas c501 chemistry analyzer. In-house LC-MS/MS assay gave quantitative measurements for both fentanyl and norfentanyl with a limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL for both. Samples with results above 1 ng/mL of either analyte were considered positive for the presence of fentanyl. The upper limit of quantification of the LC-MS/MS assay was 2000 ng/mL. The results obtained from LC-MS/MS were considered as reference values to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the immunoassays, which were calculated by dividing the number of positive and negative samples correctly identified by immunoassay by total positive and negative samples based on LC-MS/MS results, respectively. ARK is designed to detect fentanyl with a cutoff of 1 ng/mL. Roche is designed to detect norfentanyl with a cutoff of 5 ng/mL. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Analytical sensitivity and specificity were 91.9% and 99.3% for ARK and 96.8 and 98.6% for Roche. Fentanyl and norfentanyl levels by LC-MS/MS ranged from &lt;1 to &gt;2000 ng/mL with a mean of 57 and 232 and standard deviation of 235 and 578, respectively. False positives were seen in 1 sample for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. False negatives were seen in 5 samples for ARK and 2 samples for Roche. Roche accurately identified 6 positive samples that had norfentanyl concentrations less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating a potential greater sensitivity than stated. Conclusion Both immunoassays performed reasonably well, showing great specificity. Roche displayed greater sensitivity.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ajcp/aqac126.088</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9173
ispartof American journal of clinical pathology, 2022-11, Vol.158 (Supplement_1), p.S45-S46
issn 0002-9173
1943-7722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2823835681
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Fentanyl
Immunoassay
Liquid chromatography
Mass spectroscopy
Performance evaluation
title Performance Evaluation of Two FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A50%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Evaluation%20of%20Two%20FDA-Approved%20Fentanyl%20Immunoassays%20against%20LC-MS/MS&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Militello,%20L&rft.date=2022-11-09&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=S45&rft.epage=S46&rft.pages=S45-S46&rft.issn=0002-9173&rft.eissn=1943-7722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcp/aqac126.088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2823835681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1478-9cb5381e27e8633dedd54a8d568927cddaa71955e41536d487d94fb468595f9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823835681&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ajcp/aqac126.088&rfr_iscdi=true