Loading…

EMS and Bioterrorism Response

Introduction:Previous studies have found that public health systems within the United States are inadequately prepared for an act of biological terrorism. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, few studies have evaluated bioterrorism preparedness of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), even in the acceler...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Prehospital and disaster medicine 2023-05, Vol.38 (S1), p.s206-s206
Main Author: Houser, Ryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page s206
container_issue S1
container_start_page s206
container_title Prehospital and disaster medicine
container_volume 38
creator Houser, Ryan
description Introduction:Previous studies have found that public health systems within the United States are inadequately prepared for an act of biological terrorism. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, few studies have evaluated bioterrorism preparedness of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), even in the accelerating environment of biothreats.Method:This study utilized an Internet-based survey to assess the level of preparedness and willingness to respond to a bioterrorism attack and identify factors that predict preparedness and willingness among Nebraska EMS providers. The survey was available for 1 month in 2021 during which 190 EMS providers responded to the survey.Results:Only 56.8% of providers were able to recognize an illness or injury as potentially resulting from exposure to a biological agent. Provider Clinical Competency levels ranged from a low of 13.6% (ability to initiate patient care within his/her professional scope of practice and arrange for prompt referral appropriate to the identified condition(s)) to a high of 74% (the ability to respond to an emergency within the emergency management system of his/her practice, institution, and community). Only 10% of the respondents were both willing and able to effectively function in a bioterror environment.Conclusion:To effectively prepare for and respond to a bioterrorist attack, all levels of the healthcare system need to have the clinical skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary to treat patients exposed to biological agents. Policy changes and increased focus on training and drills are needed to ensure a prepared EMS system, which is crucial to a resilient state. EMS entities need to be aware of the extent of their available workforce so that the country can be prepared for the increasing threat of bioterrorism or other novel emerging infectious disease outbreaks. A resilient nation relies on a prepared set of EMS providers who are willing to respond to biological terrorism events.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1049023X23005277
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2827376811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049023X23005277</cupid><sourcerecordid>2827376811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1577-5bf10e9635ce8267a6b380cbaab62d1310fa4e22ce39d2bcb39ee419af525adc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AA9CwXM1M2ma5qjL-gdWBFfBW0jSqXSxTU12D357u-yCB_E0D977vYHH2DnwK-CgrpfAC81RvKPgXKJSB2wCupA5aFEdjnq0861_zE5SWnGOWmI5YRfzp2Vm-zq7bcOaYgyxTV32QmkIfaJTdtTYz0Rn-ztlb3fz19lDvni-f5zdLHIPUqlcugY46VJITxWWypZOVNw7a12JNQjgjS0I0ZPQNTrvhCYqQNtGorS1F1N2uesdYvjaUFqbVdjEfnxpsEIlVFkBjCnYpXwMKUVqzBDbzsZvA9xsVzB_VhgZsWds52Jbf9Bv9f_UD2xDXPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827376811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EMS and Bioterrorism Response</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Houser, Ryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Houser, Ryan</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:Previous studies have found that public health systems within the United States are inadequately prepared for an act of biological terrorism. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, few studies have evaluated bioterrorism preparedness of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), even in the accelerating environment of biothreats.Method:This study utilized an Internet-based survey to assess the level of preparedness and willingness to respond to a bioterrorism attack and identify factors that predict preparedness and willingness among Nebraska EMS providers. The survey was available for 1 month in 2021 during which 190 EMS providers responded to the survey.Results:Only 56.8% of providers were able to recognize an illness or injury as potentially resulting from exposure to a biological agent. Provider Clinical Competency levels ranged from a low of 13.6% (ability to initiate patient care within his/her professional scope of practice and arrange for prompt referral appropriate to the identified condition(s)) to a high of 74% (the ability to respond to an emergency within the emergency management system of his/her practice, institution, and community). Only 10% of the respondents were both willing and able to effectively function in a bioterror environment.Conclusion:To effectively prepare for and respond to a bioterrorist attack, all levels of the healthcare system need to have the clinical skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary to treat patients exposed to biological agents. Policy changes and increased focus on training and drills are needed to ensure a prepared EMS system, which is crucial to a resilient state. EMS entities need to be aware of the extent of their available workforce so that the country can be prepared for the increasing threat of bioterrorism or other novel emerging infectious disease outbreaks. A resilient nation relies on a prepared set of EMS providers who are willing to respond to biological terrorism events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-1938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X23005277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biological &amp; chemical terrorism ; Bioterrorism ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency preparedness ; Epidemics ; Hospitals ; Humanitarianism ; Infectious diseases ; Pandemics ; Primary care ; Public health ; Radiation ; Tabletop Presentations ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>Prehospital and disaster medicine, 2023-05, Vol.38 (S1), p.s206-s206</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049023X23005277/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,72709</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Houser, Ryan</creatorcontrib><title>EMS and Bioterrorism Response</title><title>Prehospital and disaster medicine</title><addtitle>Prehosp. Disaster med</addtitle><description>Introduction:Previous studies have found that public health systems within the United States are inadequately prepared for an act of biological terrorism. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, few studies have evaluated bioterrorism preparedness of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), even in the accelerating environment of biothreats.Method:This study utilized an Internet-based survey to assess the level of preparedness and willingness to respond to a bioterrorism attack and identify factors that predict preparedness and willingness among Nebraska EMS providers. The survey was available for 1 month in 2021 during which 190 EMS providers responded to the survey.Results:Only 56.8% of providers were able to recognize an illness or injury as potentially resulting from exposure to a biological agent. Provider Clinical Competency levels ranged from a low of 13.6% (ability to initiate patient care within his/her professional scope of practice and arrange for prompt referral appropriate to the identified condition(s)) to a high of 74% (the ability to respond to an emergency within the emergency management system of his/her practice, institution, and community). Only 10% of the respondents were both willing and able to effectively function in a bioterror environment.Conclusion:To effectively prepare for and respond to a bioterrorist attack, all levels of the healthcare system need to have the clinical skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary to treat patients exposed to biological agents. Policy changes and increased focus on training and drills are needed to ensure a prepared EMS system, which is crucial to a resilient state. EMS entities need to be aware of the extent of their available workforce so that the country can be prepared for the increasing threat of bioterrorism or other novel emerging infectious disease outbreaks. A resilient nation relies on a prepared set of EMS providers who are willing to respond to biological terrorism events.</description><subject>Biological &amp; chemical terrorism</subject><subject>Bioterrorism</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Tabletop Presentations</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>1049-023X</issn><issn>1945-1938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AA9CwXM1M2ma5qjL-gdWBFfBW0jSqXSxTU12D357u-yCB_E0D977vYHH2DnwK-CgrpfAC81RvKPgXKJSB2wCupA5aFEdjnq0861_zE5SWnGOWmI5YRfzp2Vm-zq7bcOaYgyxTV32QmkIfaJTdtTYz0Rn-ztlb3fz19lDvni-f5zdLHIPUqlcugY46VJITxWWypZOVNw7a12JNQjgjS0I0ZPQNTrvhCYqQNtGorS1F1N2uesdYvjaUFqbVdjEfnxpsEIlVFkBjCnYpXwMKUVqzBDbzsZvA9xsVzB_VhgZsWds52Jbf9Bv9f_UD2xDXPU</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Houser, Ryan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Jems Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>EMS and Bioterrorism Response</title><author>Houser, Ryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1577-5bf10e9635ce8267a6b380cbaab62d1310fa4e22ce39d2bcb39ee419af525adc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biological &amp; chemical terrorism</topic><topic>Bioterrorism</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Tabletop Presentations</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Houser, Ryan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Prehospital and disaster medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Houser, Ryan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EMS and Bioterrorism Response</atitle><jtitle>Prehospital and disaster medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prehosp. Disaster med</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>s206</spage><epage>s206</epage><pages>s206-s206</pages><issn>1049-023X</issn><eissn>1945-1938</eissn><abstract>Introduction:Previous studies have found that public health systems within the United States are inadequately prepared for an act of biological terrorism. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, few studies have evaluated bioterrorism preparedness of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), even in the accelerating environment of biothreats.Method:This study utilized an Internet-based survey to assess the level of preparedness and willingness to respond to a bioterrorism attack and identify factors that predict preparedness and willingness among Nebraska EMS providers. The survey was available for 1 month in 2021 during which 190 EMS providers responded to the survey.Results:Only 56.8% of providers were able to recognize an illness or injury as potentially resulting from exposure to a biological agent. Provider Clinical Competency levels ranged from a low of 13.6% (ability to initiate patient care within his/her professional scope of practice and arrange for prompt referral appropriate to the identified condition(s)) to a high of 74% (the ability to respond to an emergency within the emergency management system of his/her practice, institution, and community). Only 10% of the respondents were both willing and able to effectively function in a bioterror environment.Conclusion:To effectively prepare for and respond to a bioterrorist attack, all levels of the healthcare system need to have the clinical skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary to treat patients exposed to biological agents. Policy changes and increased focus on training and drills are needed to ensure a prepared EMS system, which is crucial to a resilient state. EMS entities need to be aware of the extent of their available workforce so that the country can be prepared for the increasing threat of bioterrorism or other novel emerging infectious disease outbreaks. A resilient nation relies on a prepared set of EMS providers who are willing to respond to biological terrorism events.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049023X23005277</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-023X
ispartof Prehospital and disaster medicine, 2023-05, Vol.38 (S1), p.s206-s206
issn 1049-023X
1945-1938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2827376811
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Biological & chemical terrorism
Bioterrorism
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency preparedness
Epidemics
Hospitals
Humanitarianism
Infectious diseases
Pandemics
Primary care
Public health
Radiation
Tabletop Presentations
Terrorism
title EMS and Bioterrorism Response
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A57%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EMS%20and%20Bioterrorism%20Response&rft.jtitle=Prehospital%20and%20disaster%20medicine&rft.au=Houser,%20Ryan&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=s206&rft.epage=s206&rft.pages=s206-s206&rft.issn=1049-023X&rft.eissn=1945-1938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049023X23005277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2827376811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1577-5bf10e9635ce8267a6b380cbaab62d1310fa4e22ce39d2bcb39ee419af525adc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827376811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049023X23005277&rfr_iscdi=true