Loading…
Spanish version of need for cognition scale: Evidence of reliability, validity and factorial invariance of the very efficient short-form
Need for cognition is an important individual difference referring to the tendency to enjoy and engage in effortful cognitive activity. We psychometrically validated a very efficient version of the scale in Spanish with 6 rather than 18 items. Shorter questionnaires are in high demand as they can de...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2023-06, Vol.42 (17), p.14440-14451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73 |
container_end_page | 14451 |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 14440 |
container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Loose, Tianna Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía |
description | Need for cognition is an important individual difference referring to the tendency to enjoy and engage in effortful cognitive activity. We psychometrically validated a very efficient version of the scale in Spanish with 6 rather than 18 items. Shorter questionnaires are in high demand as they can decrease participant fatigue for example. Questionnaires were administered in Spanish to two independent samples of Uruguayans (
N
= 367;
N
= 121). In sample 1, we compared the 18-item version to the 6 hypothesized items, the 6 items with the highest factor loadings and the 12 excluded items. The 6-item version achieved acceptable model fit in confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance across fields of study and gender, and performed better than other models in multiple respects. Model fit in sample 2 was even better. Construct validity with external measures (personality, academic motivations, academic performance, consideration of future consequences, work innovation) was upheld in both samples. We discussed subtle differences in correlations and the content of items across versions. ANOVAs suggested that negligible to null differences across gender and field of study. Reliability was acceptable (α = .76) in sample 1 and good in sample 2 (α = .85). In comparison to longer versions, the 6-item version came at little-to-no cost in terms of psychometric properties. Results support its use for comparison between students from different fields and gender. Disposing of this very efficient Need for Cognition Scale in Spanish can encourage its widespread use and in high-stakes assessments of the predictors of performance in higher education and the workplace. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-022-02739-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2830499702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A755110777</galeid><sourcerecordid>A755110777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkm9rFDEQxhdRsLZ-AV8FBEFw2_zZ3Vx815ZaCwWhra9DNpndTcklZ5I7vG_gxzbrFerBIRJChuH3zDCTp6reEXxKMOZniVDSNDWmtFzORE1fVEdEsK5uOGMvS4ybriaM4NfVm5QeMSa8E-Ko-nW_Ut6mCW0gJhs8CgPyAAYNISIdRm_znE1aOfiMrjbWgNcwUxGcVb11Nm8_oY1y1pQIKV-kSucQrXLI-o0qwZMiTzC32SIYBqst-IzSFGKuS6_lSfVqUC7B26f3uPr-5erh8mt9--365vL8ttYtZblmbcsXihjGaNdh3lPeCNZqoRcLgVnbgGGYCOh60gnct4YaobQRRPRUsabn7Lh6v6u7iuHHGlKWj2EdfWkp6YLhRgiO6TM1lrml9UPIUemlTVqe87YlBHM-16oPUCN4iMoFD4Mt6T3-9ABfjoGl1QcFH_cEhcnwM49qnZK8ub_7f_biep_98Bc7gXJ5SsGt579O-yDdgTqGlCIMchXtUsWtJFjOzpM758niPPnHeXJeHtuJUoH9CPF5xf9Q_QY-yNeS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2830499702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spanish version of need for cognition scale: Evidence of reliability, validity and factorial invariance of the very efficient short-form</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Loose, Tianna ; Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro ; Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</creator><creatorcontrib>Loose, Tianna ; Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro ; Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</creatorcontrib><description>Need for cognition is an important individual difference referring to the tendency to enjoy and engage in effortful cognitive activity. We psychometrically validated a very efficient version of the scale in Spanish with 6 rather than 18 items. Shorter questionnaires are in high demand as they can decrease participant fatigue for example. Questionnaires were administered in Spanish to two independent samples of Uruguayans (
N
= 367;
N
= 121). In sample 1, we compared the 18-item version to the 6 hypothesized items, the 6 items with the highest factor loadings and the 12 excluded items. The 6-item version achieved acceptable model fit in confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance across fields of study and gender, and performed better than other models in multiple respects. Model fit in sample 2 was even better. Construct validity with external measures (personality, academic motivations, academic performance, consideration of future consequences, work innovation) was upheld in both samples. We discussed subtle differences in correlations and the content of items across versions. ANOVAs suggested that negligible to null differences across gender and field of study. Reliability was acceptable (α = .76) in sample 1 and good in sample 2 (α = .85). In comparison to longer versions, the 6-item version came at little-to-no cost in terms of psychometric properties. Results support its use for comparison between students from different fields and gender. Disposing of this very efficient Need for Cognition Scale in Spanish can encourage its widespread use and in high-stakes assessments of the predictors of performance in higher education and the workplace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-02739-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Evaluation ; Gender ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Social Sciences ; Translations and translating</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023-06, Vol.42 (17), p.14440-14451</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2656-2760</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loose, Tianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</creatorcontrib><title>Spanish version of need for cognition scale: Evidence of reliability, validity and factorial invariance of the very efficient short-form</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Need for cognition is an important individual difference referring to the tendency to enjoy and engage in effortful cognitive activity. We psychometrically validated a very efficient version of the scale in Spanish with 6 rather than 18 items. Shorter questionnaires are in high demand as they can decrease participant fatigue for example. Questionnaires were administered in Spanish to two independent samples of Uruguayans (
N
= 367;
N
= 121). In sample 1, we compared the 18-item version to the 6 hypothesized items, the 6 items with the highest factor loadings and the 12 excluded items. The 6-item version achieved acceptable model fit in confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance across fields of study and gender, and performed better than other models in multiple respects. Model fit in sample 2 was even better. Construct validity with external measures (personality, academic motivations, academic performance, consideration of future consequences, work innovation) was upheld in both samples. We discussed subtle differences in correlations and the content of items across versions. ANOVAs suggested that negligible to null differences across gender and field of study. Reliability was acceptable (α = .76) in sample 1 and good in sample 2 (α = .85). In comparison to longer versions, the 6-item version came at little-to-no cost in terms of psychometric properties. Results support its use for comparison between students from different fields and gender. Disposing of this very efficient Need for Cognition Scale in Spanish can encourage its widespread use and in high-stakes assessments of the predictors of performance in higher education and the workplace.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Translations and translating</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkm9rFDEQxhdRsLZ-AV8FBEFw2_zZ3Vx815ZaCwWhra9DNpndTcklZ5I7vG_gxzbrFerBIRJChuH3zDCTp6reEXxKMOZniVDSNDWmtFzORE1fVEdEsK5uOGMvS4ybriaM4NfVm5QeMSa8E-Ko-nW_Ut6mCW0gJhs8CgPyAAYNISIdRm_znE1aOfiMrjbWgNcwUxGcVb11Nm8_oY1y1pQIKV-kSucQrXLI-o0qwZMiTzC32SIYBqst-IzSFGKuS6_lSfVqUC7B26f3uPr-5erh8mt9--365vL8ttYtZblmbcsXihjGaNdh3lPeCNZqoRcLgVnbgGGYCOh60gnct4YaobQRRPRUsabn7Lh6v6u7iuHHGlKWj2EdfWkp6YLhRgiO6TM1lrml9UPIUemlTVqe87YlBHM-16oPUCN4iMoFD4Mt6T3-9ABfjoGl1QcFH_cEhcnwM49qnZK8ub_7f_biep_98Bc7gXJ5SsGt579O-yDdgTqGlCIMchXtUsWtJFjOzpM758niPPnHeXJeHtuJUoH9CPF5xf9Q_QY-yNeS</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Loose, Tianna</creator><creator>Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro</creator><creator>Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-2760</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Spanish version of need for cognition scale: Evidence of reliability, validity and factorial invariance of the very efficient short-form</title><author>Loose, Tianna ; Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro ; Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Translations and translating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loose, Tianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loose, Tianna</au><au>Vasquez-Echeverría, Alejandro</au><au>Álvarez-Núñez, Lucía</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spanish version of need for cognition scale: Evidence of reliability, validity and factorial invariance of the very efficient short-form</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>14440</spage><epage>14451</epage><pages>14440-14451</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Need for cognition is an important individual difference referring to the tendency to enjoy and engage in effortful cognitive activity. We psychometrically validated a very efficient version of the scale in Spanish with 6 rather than 18 items. Shorter questionnaires are in high demand as they can decrease participant fatigue for example. Questionnaires were administered in Spanish to two independent samples of Uruguayans (
N
= 367;
N
= 121). In sample 1, we compared the 18-item version to the 6 hypothesized items, the 6 items with the highest factor loadings and the 12 excluded items. The 6-item version achieved acceptable model fit in confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance across fields of study and gender, and performed better than other models in multiple respects. Model fit in sample 2 was even better. Construct validity with external measures (personality, academic motivations, academic performance, consideration of future consequences, work innovation) was upheld in both samples. We discussed subtle differences in correlations and the content of items across versions. ANOVAs suggested that negligible to null differences across gender and field of study. Reliability was acceptable (α = .76) in sample 1 and good in sample 2 (α = .85). In comparison to longer versions, the 6-item version came at little-to-no cost in terms of psychometric properties. Results support its use for comparison between students from different fields and gender. Disposing of this very efficient Need for Cognition Scale in Spanish can encourage its widespread use and in high-stakes assessments of the predictors of performance in higher education and the workplace.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-022-02739-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-2760</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023-06, Vol.42 (17), p.14440-14451 |
issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2830499702 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Academic disciplines Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognition Cognition & reasoning Evaluation Gender Psychological tests Psychology Questionnaires Social Sciences Translations and translating |
title | Spanish version of need for cognition scale: Evidence of reliability, validity and factorial invariance of the very efficient short-form |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spanish%20version%20of%20need%20for%20cognition%20scale:%20Evidence%20of%20reliability,%20validity%20and%20factorial%20invariance%20of%20the%20very%20efficient%20short-form&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Loose,%20Tianna&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=14440&rft.epage=14451&rft.pages=14440-14451&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-022-02739-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA755110777%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-35578a1d3326607b274935c9c8890354ed3019e6b1690b5d2d9acd919b2a34b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2830499702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A755110777&rfr_iscdi=true |