Loading…

Pathways to intimacy: The direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility and emotion dysregulation

Cognitive flexibility refers to a person’s awareness of and ability to shift between alternative options in a particular situation. It is a known marker of resiliency and may be a particularly relevant factor influencing emotional intimacy in relationship functioning. Although cognitive flexibility...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Couple and family psychology 2023-06
Main Authors: Kenneally, Laura B., Milam, Alicia L., Paulson, James F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Couple and family psychology
container_volume
creator Kenneally, Laura B.
Milam, Alicia L.
Paulson, James F.
description Cognitive flexibility refers to a person’s awareness of and ability to shift between alternative options in a particular situation. It is a known marker of resiliency and may be a particularly relevant factor influencing emotional intimacy in relationship functioning. Although cognitive flexibility has been negatively associated with infidelity and intimate partner violence, it has not been examined as a predictor of relationship functioning more broadly. Cognitive flexibility has also been associated with emotion dysregulation, which has been negatively related to emotional intimacy. The present study sought to examine the direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation and further examine which subcomponents of emotion dysregulation may best characterize pathways. Participants ( N = 528, M age = 19.92, 54.5% White; 84% cisgender female) were students at a large Southeastern University who completed self-report questionnaires assessing cognitive flexibility, emotion dysregulation, and emotional intimacy. Results suggest there are significant direct effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation. Lack of access to emotion regulation strategies appeared to be the primary pathway through which cognitive flexibility may influence emotional intimacy. Enhancing either cognitive flexibility or emotion regulation capacity may have benefits for relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/cfp0000247
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2830976393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2830976393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-4e966cac83479691b1a9d9aa7834dc6cbf57133292859d4bc8103605a8bad8793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUMtKAzEUDaJgqd34BQF3wmgymcnDnRStQkEXFdwNmTzalOmkJqk6f29qK97NuY_DvfccAC4xusGIsFtltyhHWbETMCoxRUWF0fvpX44EPQeTGNd7Ul2TmtMRWL3KtPqSQ4TJQ9cnt5FquIOLlYHaBaMSlL3Og2NhrM0QobdQ-WXvkvs00Hbm27Wuc2n4ZZuNT873UA8xmOWuk_vqApxZ2UUzOeIYvD0-LKZPxfxl9jy9nxeqxDwVlRGUKqk4qZigArdYCi2kZLmhFVWtrRkmpBQlr4WuWsWzdIpqyVupORNkDK4Oe7fBf-xMTM3a70KfTzYlJ0gwSgTJrOsDSwUf85e22YYsPQwNRs3ezObfTPIDK1Fnzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2830976393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pathways to intimacy: The direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility and emotion dysregulation</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Kenneally, Laura B. ; Milam, Alicia L. ; Paulson, James F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenneally, Laura B. ; Milam, Alicia L. ; Paulson, James F.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive flexibility refers to a person’s awareness of and ability to shift between alternative options in a particular situation. It is a known marker of resiliency and may be a particularly relevant factor influencing emotional intimacy in relationship functioning. Although cognitive flexibility has been negatively associated with infidelity and intimate partner violence, it has not been examined as a predictor of relationship functioning more broadly. Cognitive flexibility has also been associated with emotion dysregulation, which has been negatively related to emotional intimacy. The present study sought to examine the direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation and further examine which subcomponents of emotion dysregulation may best characterize pathways. Participants ( N = 528, M age = 19.92, 54.5% White; 84% cisgender female) were students at a large Southeastern University who completed self-report questionnaires assessing cognitive flexibility, emotion dysregulation, and emotional intimacy. Results suggest there are significant direct effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation. Lack of access to emotion regulation strategies appeared to be the primary pathway through which cognitive flexibility may influence emotional intimacy. Enhancing either cognitive flexibility or emotion regulation capacity may have benefits for relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 2160-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Cognitive Flexibility ; College Students ; Couples ; Emotional Disturbances ; Emotional Regulation ; Female ; Human ; Intimacy ; Male</subject><ispartof>Couple and family psychology, 2023-06</ispartof><rights>2023, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4599-848X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenneally, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milam, Alicia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulson, James F.</creatorcontrib><title>Pathways to intimacy: The direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility and emotion dysregulation</title><title>Couple and family psychology</title><description>Cognitive flexibility refers to a person’s awareness of and ability to shift between alternative options in a particular situation. It is a known marker of resiliency and may be a particularly relevant factor influencing emotional intimacy in relationship functioning. Although cognitive flexibility has been negatively associated with infidelity and intimate partner violence, it has not been examined as a predictor of relationship functioning more broadly. Cognitive flexibility has also been associated with emotion dysregulation, which has been negatively related to emotional intimacy. The present study sought to examine the direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation and further examine which subcomponents of emotion dysregulation may best characterize pathways. Participants ( N = 528, M age = 19.92, 54.5% White; 84% cisgender female) were students at a large Southeastern University who completed self-report questionnaires assessing cognitive flexibility, emotion dysregulation, and emotional intimacy. Results suggest there are significant direct effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation. Lack of access to emotion regulation strategies appeared to be the primary pathway through which cognitive flexibility may influence emotional intimacy. Enhancing either cognitive flexibility or emotion regulation capacity may have benefits for relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Flexibility</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Emotional Disturbances</subject><subject>Emotional Regulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>2160-4096</issn><issn>2160-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFUMtKAzEUDaJgqd34BQF3wmgymcnDnRStQkEXFdwNmTzalOmkJqk6f29qK97NuY_DvfccAC4xusGIsFtltyhHWbETMCoxRUWF0fvpX44EPQeTGNd7Ul2TmtMRWL3KtPqSQ4TJQ9cnt5FquIOLlYHaBaMSlL3Og2NhrM0QobdQ-WXvkvs00Hbm27Wuc2n4ZZuNT873UA8xmOWuk_vqApxZ2UUzOeIYvD0-LKZPxfxl9jy9nxeqxDwVlRGUKqk4qZigArdYCi2kZLmhFVWtrRkmpBQlr4WuWsWzdIpqyVupORNkDK4Oe7fBf-xMTM3a70KfTzYlJ0gwSgTJrOsDSwUf85e22YYsPQwNRs3ezObfTPIDK1Fnzg</recordid><startdate>20230629</startdate><enddate>20230629</enddate><creator>Kenneally, Laura B.</creator><creator>Milam, Alicia L.</creator><creator>Paulson, James F.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4599-848X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230629</creationdate><title>Pathways to intimacy: The direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility and emotion dysregulation</title><author>Kenneally, Laura B. ; Milam, Alicia L. ; Paulson, James F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-4e966cac83479691b1a9d9aa7834dc6cbf57133292859d4bc8103605a8bad8793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Flexibility</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Emotional Disturbances</topic><topic>Emotional Regulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenneally, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milam, Alicia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulson, James F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Couple and family psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenneally, Laura B.</au><au>Milam, Alicia L.</au><au>Paulson, James F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pathways to intimacy: The direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility and emotion dysregulation</atitle><jtitle>Couple and family psychology</jtitle><date>2023-06-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>2160-4096</issn><eissn>2160-410X</eissn><abstract>Cognitive flexibility refers to a person’s awareness of and ability to shift between alternative options in a particular situation. It is a known marker of resiliency and may be a particularly relevant factor influencing emotional intimacy in relationship functioning. Although cognitive flexibility has been negatively associated with infidelity and intimate partner violence, it has not been examined as a predictor of relationship functioning more broadly. Cognitive flexibility has also been associated with emotion dysregulation, which has been negatively related to emotional intimacy. The present study sought to examine the direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation and further examine which subcomponents of emotion dysregulation may best characterize pathways. Participants ( N = 528, M age = 19.92, 54.5% White; 84% cisgender female) were students at a large Southeastern University who completed self-report questionnaires assessing cognitive flexibility, emotion dysregulation, and emotional intimacy. Results suggest there are significant direct effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility on emotional intimacy through emotion dysregulation. Lack of access to emotion regulation strategies appeared to be the primary pathway through which cognitive flexibility may influence emotional intimacy. Enhancing either cognitive flexibility or emotion regulation capacity may have benefits for relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/cfp0000247</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4599-848X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2160-4096
ispartof Couple and family psychology, 2023-06
issn 2160-4096
2160-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2830976393
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Cognition
Cognitive Flexibility
College Students
Couples
Emotional Disturbances
Emotional Regulation
Female
Human
Intimacy
Male
title Pathways to intimacy: The direct and indirect effects of cognitive flexibility and emotion dysregulation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pathways%20to%20intimacy:%20The%20direct%20and%20indirect%20effects%20of%20cognitive%20flexibility%20and%20emotion%20dysregulation&rft.jtitle=Couple%20and%20family%20psychology&rft.au=Kenneally,%20Laura%20B.&rft.date=2023-06-29&rft.issn=2160-4096&rft.eissn=2160-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/cfp0000247&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2830976393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-4e966cac83479691b1a9d9aa7834dc6cbf57133292859d4bc8103605a8bad8793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2830976393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true