Loading…

Rents and Intangible Capital: A Q+ Framework

ABSTRACT In recent years, U.S. investment has been lackluster, despite rising valuations. Key explanations include growing rents and growing intangibles. We propose and estimate a framework to quantify their roles. The gap between valuations—reflected in average Q—and investment—reflected in margina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of finance (New York) 2023-08, Vol.78 (4), p.1873-1916
Main Authors: CROUZET, NICOLAS, EBERLY, JANICE
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23
container_end_page 1916
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1873
container_title The Journal of finance (New York)
container_volume 78
creator CROUZET, NICOLAS
EBERLY, JANICE
description ABSTRACT In recent years, U.S. investment has been lackluster, despite rising valuations. Key explanations include growing rents and growing intangibles. We propose and estimate a framework to quantify their roles. The gap between valuations—reflected in average Q—and investment—reflected in marginal q—can be decomposed into three terms: the value of installed intangibles; rents generated by physical capital; and an interaction term, measuring rents generated by intangibles. The intangible related terms contribute significantly to the gap, particularly in fast‐growing sectors. Our findings suggest care in a pure‐rents interpretation, given the rising role of intangibles.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jofi.13231
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2832167339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2832167339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYvPkHAm5q6M9ukqbcSGq0UiqLnZTaZldQ0qbsppW9vajz7X4aBb-aHT4hrkCPo8rBubDkChQpOxACisQxjjOFUDKREDEEmeC4uvF_LY6JoIO7fuG59QHURLOqW6s_SVByktC1bqh6DWfB6F2SONrxv3NelOLNUeb76m0Pxkc3f0-dwuXpapLNlmKsxQghc5GCm026ZEKEsLHbNysiEE6OSmCgqFJgoZ8PIBdOYieMY7cSaqGBUQ3HT_9265nvHvtXrZufqrlJjohDiiVLTjrrtqdw13ju2euvKDbmDBqmPNvTRhv610cHQw_uy4sM_pH5ZZYv-5gfu92AK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2832167339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rents and Intangible Capital: A Q+ Framework</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>CROUZET, NICOLAS ; EBERLY, JANICE</creator><creatorcontrib>CROUZET, NICOLAS ; EBERLY, JANICE</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT In recent years, U.S. investment has been lackluster, despite rising valuations. Key explanations include growing rents and growing intangibles. We propose and estimate a framework to quantify their roles. The gap between valuations—reflected in average Q—and investment—reflected in marginal q—can be decomposed into three terms: the value of installed intangibles; rents generated by physical capital; and an interaction term, measuring rents generated by intangibles. The intangible related terms contribute significantly to the gap, particularly in fast‐growing sectors. Our findings suggest care in a pure‐rents interpretation, given the rising role of intangibles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jofi.13231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Frame analysis ; Intangible assets ; Rents</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 2023-08, Vol.78 (4), p.1873-1916</ispartof><rights>2023 the American Finance Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CROUZET, NICOLAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERLY, JANICE</creatorcontrib><title>Rents and Intangible Capital: A Q+ Framework</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>ABSTRACT In recent years, U.S. investment has been lackluster, despite rising valuations. Key explanations include growing rents and growing intangibles. We propose and estimate a framework to quantify their roles. The gap between valuations—reflected in average Q—and investment—reflected in marginal q—can be decomposed into three terms: the value of installed intangibles; rents generated by physical capital; and an interaction term, measuring rents generated by intangibles. The intangible related terms contribute significantly to the gap, particularly in fast‐growing sectors. Our findings suggest care in a pure‐rents interpretation, given the rising role of intangibles.</description><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Intangible assets</subject><subject>Rents</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYvPkHAm5q6M9ukqbcSGq0UiqLnZTaZldQ0qbsppW9vajz7X4aBb-aHT4hrkCPo8rBubDkChQpOxACisQxjjOFUDKREDEEmeC4uvF_LY6JoIO7fuG59QHURLOqW6s_SVByktC1bqh6DWfB6F2SONrxv3NelOLNUeb76m0Pxkc3f0-dwuXpapLNlmKsxQghc5GCm026ZEKEsLHbNysiEE6OSmCgqFJgoZ8PIBdOYieMY7cSaqGBUQ3HT_9265nvHvtXrZufqrlJjohDiiVLTjrrtqdw13ju2euvKDbmDBqmPNvTRhv610cHQw_uy4sM_pH5ZZYv-5gfu92AK</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>CROUZET, NICOLAS</creator><creator>EBERLY, JANICE</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Rents and Intangible Capital: A Q+ Framework</title><author>CROUZET, NICOLAS ; EBERLY, JANICE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Intangible assets</topic><topic>Rents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CROUZET, NICOLAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERLY, JANICE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CROUZET, NICOLAS</au><au>EBERLY, JANICE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rents and Intangible Capital: A Q+ Framework</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1873</spage><epage>1916</epage><pages>1873-1916</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT In recent years, U.S. investment has been lackluster, despite rising valuations. Key explanations include growing rents and growing intangibles. We propose and estimate a framework to quantify their roles. The gap between valuations—reflected in average Q—and investment—reflected in marginal q—can be decomposed into three terms: the value of installed intangibles; rents generated by physical capital; and an interaction term, measuring rents generated by intangibles. The intangible related terms contribute significantly to the gap, particularly in fast‐growing sectors. Our findings suggest care in a pure‐rents interpretation, given the rising role of intangibles.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jofi.13231</doi><tpages>44</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1082
ispartof The Journal of finance (New York), 2023-08, Vol.78 (4), p.1873-1916
issn 0022-1082
1540-6261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2832167339
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Frame analysis
Intangible assets
Rents
title Rents and Intangible Capital: A Q+ Framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A52%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rents%20and%20Intangible%20Capital:%20A%20Q+%20Framework&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=CROUZET,%20NICOLAS&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1873&rft.epage=1916&rft.pages=1873-1916&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jofi.13231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2832167339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3421-1edc1b993427aa20df21083b08e8b386aa5d31b5cebe2edea4eae662f7fb5de23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2832167339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true