Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?

Objective: This study assessed the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics. Materials and Methods: The YouTube videos were viewed using the searching terms ‘regenerative endodontic treatment’, ‘endodontic regeneration’, ‘pulp regeneration’, ‘pulp revascul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Meandros medical and dental journal 2022-06, Vol.23 (2), p.188-193
Main Authors: Durmazpınar, Parla Meva, Kanmaz, Burcu, Adalı, Emine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dentistry
Dentists
Endodontics
Hypotheses
Information sources
Medical personnel
Medical prognosis
Professionals
Root canals
Students
Teeth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-cf9a73888f45294c3fdb801a322704e19d16a97cc327228cca3c67e1c129db323
container_end_page 193
container_issue 2
container_start_page 188
container_title Meandros medical and dental journal
container_volume 23
creator Durmazpınar, Parla Meva
Kanmaz, Burcu
Adalı, Emine
description Objective: This study assessed the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics. Materials and Methods: The YouTube videos were viewed using the searching terms ‘regenerative endodontic treatment’, ‘endodontic regeneration’, ‘pulp regeneration’, ‘pulp revascularization’, and ‘pulp revitalization’. The first 60 videos (300 videos, in total) were searched for each term and after initial screening, 70 videos were selected for analysis by three reviewers according to the inclusion criteria. The global score for educational value and modified DISCERN score was used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test were used to analyze data. Correlations analyzed using Pearson-Spearman test. Results: The mean of Modified DISCERN score of the YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics was 3.02±1.07 which was categorized as moderate reliability. The mean of global score for educational value of the videos was 2.05±1.13 and 37.1% (n=26) of them were in a poor quality while 14.3% (n=10) were in a good quality due to the scoring of this value. No excellent quality video was found. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the amount of educational and reliable information on YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics is limited.
doi_str_mv 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2833252953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2833252953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-cf9a73888f45294c3fdb801a322704e19d16a97cc327228cca3c67e1c129db323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEUxIMoWGq_Q6DnrcnLbrLBg0ipWiyI_w6eQppky5Y2qcmu4Ldvait4mmEY5j1-CI0pmZQgyuut097GkCYrvXE-KxCgEwJcsjM0AFrKQhLOzv_5SzRKaU0IoYJXkvEBepon_Bn6rl86_NLrTdu0zmKdsPZ47psQt7prg8dvoY_G4RzgV7dy3sWcfzs88zbY4LvWpNsrdNHoTXKjkw7Rx_3sffpYLJ4f5tO7RWEor7rCNFILVtd1U1YgS8Mau6wJ1QxAkNJRaSnXUhjDQADUxmhmuHDUUJB2yYAN0fi4u4vhq3epU-v8nc8nFdSMQV6tWG7dHFsmM0rRNWoX262OP4oSdQCo_gCqE0B1AKh-AbI9HHJo5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833252953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva ; Kanmaz, Burcu ; Adalı, Emine</creator><creatorcontrib>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva ; Kanmaz, Burcu ; Adalı, Emine</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study assessed the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics. Materials and Methods: The YouTube videos were viewed using the searching terms ‘regenerative endodontic treatment’, ‘endodontic regeneration’, ‘pulp regeneration’, ‘pulp revascularization’, and ‘pulp revitalization’. The first 60 videos (300 videos, in total) were searched for each term and after initial screening, 70 videos were selected for analysis by three reviewers according to the inclusion criteria. The global score for educational value and modified DISCERN score was used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test were used to analyze data. Correlations analyzed using Pearson-Spearman test. Results: The mean of Modified DISCERN score of the YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics was 3.02±1.07 which was categorized as moderate reliability. The mean of global score for educational value of the videos was 2.05±1.13 and 37.1% (n=26) of them were in a poor quality while 14.3% (n=10) were in a good quality due to the scoring of this value. No excellent quality video was found. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the amount of educational and reliable information on YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-9063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-9063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Aydın: Galenos Publishing House</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Dentists ; Endodontics ; Hypotheses ; Information sources ; Medical personnel ; Medical prognosis ; Professionals ; Root canals ; Students ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Meandros medical and dental journal, 2022-06, Vol.23 (2), p.188-193</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-cf9a73888f45294c3fdb801a322704e19d16a97cc327228cca3c67e1c129db323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8088-5691 ; 0000-0002-0623-5746 ; 0000-0001-9100-8398</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2833252953/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2833252953?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanmaz, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adalı, Emine</creatorcontrib><title>Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?</title><title>Meandros medical and dental journal</title><description>Objective: This study assessed the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics. Materials and Methods: The YouTube videos were viewed using the searching terms ‘regenerative endodontic treatment’, ‘endodontic regeneration’, ‘pulp regeneration’, ‘pulp revascularization’, and ‘pulp revitalization’. The first 60 videos (300 videos, in total) were searched for each term and after initial screening, 70 videos were selected for analysis by three reviewers according to the inclusion criteria. The global score for educational value and modified DISCERN score was used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test were used to analyze data. Correlations analyzed using Pearson-Spearman test. Results: The mean of Modified DISCERN score of the YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics was 3.02±1.07 which was categorized as moderate reliability. The mean of global score for educational value of the videos was 2.05±1.13 and 37.1% (n=26) of them were in a poor quality while 14.3% (n=10) were in a good quality due to the scoring of this value. No excellent quality video was found. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the amount of educational and reliable information on YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics is limited.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2149-9063</issn><issn>2149-9063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEUxIMoWGq_Q6DnrcnLbrLBg0ipWiyI_w6eQppky5Y2qcmu4Ldvait4mmEY5j1-CI0pmZQgyuut097GkCYrvXE-KxCgEwJcsjM0AFrKQhLOzv_5SzRKaU0IoYJXkvEBepon_Bn6rl86_NLrTdu0zmKdsPZ47psQt7prg8dvoY_G4RzgV7dy3sWcfzs88zbY4LvWpNsrdNHoTXKjkw7Rx_3sffpYLJ4f5tO7RWEor7rCNFILVtd1U1YgS8Mau6wJ1QxAkNJRaSnXUhjDQADUxmhmuHDUUJB2yYAN0fi4u4vhq3epU-v8nc8nFdSMQV6tWG7dHFsmM0rRNWoX262OP4oSdQCo_gCqE0B1AKh-AbI9HHJo5Q</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva</creator><creator>Kanmaz, Burcu</creator><creator>Adalı, Emine</creator><general>Galenos Publishing House</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8088-5691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-5746</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-8398</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?</title><author>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva ; Kanmaz, Burcu ; Adalı, Emine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-cf9a73888f45294c3fdb801a322704e19d16a97cc327228cca3c67e1c129db323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanmaz, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adalı, Emine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Meandros medical and dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durmazpınar, Parla Meva</au><au>Kanmaz, Burcu</au><au>Adalı, Emine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?</atitle><jtitle>Meandros medical and dental journal</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>188-193</pages><issn>2149-9063</issn><eissn>2149-9063</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study assessed the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics. Materials and Methods: The YouTube videos were viewed using the searching terms ‘regenerative endodontic treatment’, ‘endodontic regeneration’, ‘pulp regeneration’, ‘pulp revascularization’, and ‘pulp revitalization’. The first 60 videos (300 videos, in total) were searched for each term and after initial screening, 70 videos were selected for analysis by three reviewers according to the inclusion criteria. The global score for educational value and modified DISCERN score was used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test were used to analyze data. Correlations analyzed using Pearson-Spearman test. Results: The mean of Modified DISCERN score of the YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics was 3.02±1.07 which was categorized as moderate reliability. The mean of global score for educational value of the videos was 2.05±1.13 and 37.1% (n=26) of them were in a poor quality while 14.3% (n=10) were in a good quality due to the scoring of this value. No excellent quality video was found. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the amount of educational and reliable information on YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics is limited.</abstract><cop>Aydın</cop><pub>Galenos Publishing House</pub><doi>10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8088-5691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-5746</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-8398</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-9063
ispartof Meandros medical and dental journal, 2022-06, Vol.23 (2), p.188-193
issn 2149-9063
2149-9063
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2833252953
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Dentistry
Dentists
Endodontics
Hypotheses
Information sources
Medical personnel
Medical prognosis
Professionals
Root canals
Students
Teeth
title Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Youtube%20Qualified%20as%20an%20Information%20Source%20for%20Regenerative%20Endodontics?&rft.jtitle=Meandros%20medical%20and%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Durmazp%C4%B1nar,%20Parla%20Meva&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=188-193&rft.issn=2149-9063&rft.eissn=2149-9063&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833252953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-cf9a73888f45294c3fdb801a322704e19d16a97cc327228cca3c67e1c129db323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833252953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true