Analyzing the sustainability of intensified side‐stream extractive distillation for binary azeotropic separation: a comparative study

BACKGROUND The sustainability performance of extractive distillation (ED) that collectively considers energy efficiency, process safety, economic profitability, process control, and environmental emission has not been widely reported. Motivated by this lack of research, we analyzed and compared the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) 2023-08, Vol.98 (8), p.1995-2015
Main Authors: Kong, Zong Yang, Sánchez‐Ramírez, Eduardo, Yang, Ao, Segovia‐Hernández, Juan Gabriel, Sunarso, Jaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
azeotropic separation
Comparative studies
Configurations
Design
Design optimization
Distillation
Economics
Emissions control
Energy conservation
Energy consumption
Energy efficiency
Environmental performance
extractive distillation
Process control
Process controls
process intensification
process optimization
Profitability
Separation
Sustainability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND The sustainability performance of extractive distillation (ED) that collectively considers energy efficiency, process safety, economic profitability, process control, and environmental emission has not been widely reported. Motivated by this lack of research, we analyzed and compared the sustainability performance of the intensified side‐stream ED (SSED) with that of the conventional extractive distillation (CED) for the separation of binary azeotropic mixtures. Two different design approaches were analyzed; the first approach involves designing the intensified SSED by preserving the original CED column configuration, while the second approach involves optimizing the original column configuration to become a new intensified SSED configuration. RESULTS We found that preserving the original configuration usually provides energy‐savings, but this advantage is not guaranteed unless the process is optimized. Generally, the reduction in energy consumption improves economic and environmental performance. However, the optimized design has a higher risk index because it is usually larger in size, for the sake of lowering the energy consumption. In addition, the optimized design usually has a higher condition number, which signifies that a more complex control structure is required. CONCLUSION Altogether, designing the intensified process via process optimization does not always guarantee significant improvement in all sustainability indicators. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).
ISSN:0268-2575
1097-4660
DOI:10.1002/jctb.7419