‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy’, by Albert E. F. Schäffle

[...]of its wide circulation it became Schäffle's most famous book. For Schäffle (1908: 3–5), ‘socialism’ aims to ‘replace the system of private capital . . . regulated . . . by the free competition of private enterprise . . . by a system of collective capital, that is, by a method of productio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of institutional economics 2007-04, Vol.3 (1), p.113-125
Main Author: HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Economic planning
Economic theory
Industrial democracy
Market economies
Ownership
Planning
Private enterprise
Production
Social democracy
Socialism
Stagnation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363
container_end_page 125
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title Journal of institutional economics
container_volume 3
creator HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.
description [...]of its wide circulation it became Schäffle's most famous book. For Schäffle (1908: 3–5), ‘socialism’ aims to ‘replace the system of private capital . . . regulated . . . by the free competition of private enterprise . . . by a system of collective capital, that is, by a method of production which would introduce a unified (social or ‘collective’) organization of national labour, on the basis of collective or common ownership of the means of production by all the members of society . . [...]modern theory and evidence leave a much more open case for some versions of industrial democracy within an exchange or market economy (Bonin et al., 1993). The outcome of this debate was not simply to expose problems with collective economic planning, but to increase our understanding of the nature and role of knowledge and the operation of market institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1744137406000580
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836225135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1744137406000580</cupid><sourcerecordid>2836225135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9OwkAQxjdGExF9AG8bvVrc_7s9EgQlIfEAnpvtdlZKWotbOPTGY-jdN_FNeBJLIHownGYy-X3fzHwIXVPSo4Tq-ynVQlCuBVGEEGnICersRhHlhp3-9lqco4u6XhAiFDeqg0bbzcdsDnhcLqu6ztO8yFcNrjyeVi63BX6AsnLBuma7-bzDaYP7RQphhYc9POrhqZt_f3lfwCU687ao4epQu-hlNJwNnqLJ8-N40J9EjppYRoo53t5mufAStHHOg848dbHhMWdxbDOmOGidGQbSa0MAhGLEZsJKIFzxLrrd-y5D9b6GepUsqnV4a1cmzHDFmKRcttTNUYpyJYjWpoXoHnKh_TyAT5YhL21oEkqSXabJv0xbDT9obJmGPHuFP-fjqh89CXct</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213640778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy’, by Albert E. F. Schäffle</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Cambridge University Press:Jisc Collections:Cambridge University Press Read and Publish Agreement 2021-24 (Reading list)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</creator><creatorcontrib>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</creatorcontrib><description>[...]of its wide circulation it became Schäffle's most famous book. For Schäffle (1908: 3–5), ‘socialism’ aims to ‘replace the system of private capital . . . regulated . . . by the free competition of private enterprise . . . by a system of collective capital, that is, by a method of production which would introduce a unified (social or ‘collective’) organization of national labour, on the basis of collective or common ownership of the means of production by all the members of society . . [...]modern theory and evidence leave a much more open case for some versions of industrial democracy within an exchange or market economy (Bonin et al., 1993). The outcome of this debate was not simply to expose problems with collective economic planning, but to increase our understanding of the nature and role of knowledge and the operation of market institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-1374</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1744137406000580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Economic planning ; Economic theory ; Industrial democracy ; Market economies ; Ownership ; Planning ; Private enterprise ; Production ; Social democracy ; Socialism ; Stagnation</subject><ispartof>Journal of institutional economics, 2007-04, Vol.3 (1), p.113-125</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2006</rights><rights>The JOIE Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836225135/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836225135?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27866,27924,27925,36060,44363,72960,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</creatorcontrib><title>‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy’, by Albert E. F. Schäffle</title><title>Journal of institutional economics</title><description>[...]of its wide circulation it became Schäffle's most famous book. For Schäffle (1908: 3–5), ‘socialism’ aims to ‘replace the system of private capital . . . regulated . . . by the free competition of private enterprise . . . by a system of collective capital, that is, by a method of production which would introduce a unified (social or ‘collective’) organization of national labour, on the basis of collective or common ownership of the means of production by all the members of society . . [...]modern theory and evidence leave a much more open case for some versions of industrial democracy within an exchange or market economy (Bonin et al., 1993). The outcome of this debate was not simply to expose problems with collective economic planning, but to increase our understanding of the nature and role of knowledge and the operation of market institutions.</description><subject>Economic planning</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Industrial democracy</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Private enterprise</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Social democracy</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Stagnation</subject><issn>1744-1374</issn><issn>1744-1382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9OwkAQxjdGExF9AG8bvVrc_7s9EgQlIfEAnpvtdlZKWotbOPTGY-jdN_FNeBJLIHownGYy-X3fzHwIXVPSo4Tq-ynVQlCuBVGEEGnICersRhHlhp3-9lqco4u6XhAiFDeqg0bbzcdsDnhcLqu6ztO8yFcNrjyeVi63BX6AsnLBuma7-bzDaYP7RQphhYc9POrhqZt_f3lfwCU687ao4epQu-hlNJwNnqLJ8-N40J9EjppYRoo53t5mufAStHHOg848dbHhMWdxbDOmOGidGQbSa0MAhGLEZsJKIFzxLrrd-y5D9b6GepUsqnV4a1cmzHDFmKRcttTNUYpyJYjWpoXoHnKh_TyAT5YhL21oEkqSXabJv0xbDT9obJmGPHuFP-fjqh89CXct</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy’, by Albert E. F. Schäffle</title><author>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Economic planning</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Industrial democracy</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Private enterprise</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Social democracy</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Stagnation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of institutional economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HODGSON, GEOFFREY M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy’, by Albert E. F. Schäffle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of institutional economics</jtitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>113-125</pages><issn>1744-1374</issn><eissn>1744-1382</eissn><abstract>[...]of its wide circulation it became Schäffle's most famous book. For Schäffle (1908: 3–5), ‘socialism’ aims to ‘replace the system of private capital . . . regulated . . . by the free competition of private enterprise . . . by a system of collective capital, that is, by a method of production which would introduce a unified (social or ‘collective’) organization of national labour, on the basis of collective or common ownership of the means of production by all the members of society . . [...]modern theory and evidence leave a much more open case for some versions of industrial democracy within an exchange or market economy (Bonin et al., 1993). The outcome of this debate was not simply to expose problems with collective economic planning, but to increase our understanding of the nature and role of knowledge and the operation of market institutions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1744137406000580</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-1374
ispartof Journal of institutional economics, 2007-04, Vol.3 (1), p.113-125
issn 1744-1374
1744-1382
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2836225135
source Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Global; Cambridge University Press:Jisc Collections:Cambridge University Press Read and Publish Agreement 2021-24 (Reading list); PAIS Index
subjects Economic planning
Economic theory
Industrial democracy
Market economies
Ownership
Planning
Private enterprise
Production
Social democracy
Socialism
Stagnation
title ‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy’, by Albert E. F. Schäffle
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A26%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98The%20Impossibility%20of%20Social%20Democracy%E2%80%99,%20by%20Albert%20E.%20F.%20Sch%C3%A4ffle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20institutional%20economics&rft.au=HODGSON,%20GEOFFREY%20M.&rft.date=2007-04&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=113-125&rft.issn=1744-1374&rft.eissn=1744-1382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1744137406000580&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836225135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1895-62c3580a34f5e78ccfe7df1c98393299ad263e77d82e5f780ee4620ad4a5e0363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213640778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1744137406000580&rfr_iscdi=true