Loading…
Learning to live with reintroduced species: beaver management groups are an adaptive process
In anthropogenic landscapes, wildlife reintroductions are likely to result in interactions between people and reintroduced species. People living in the vicinity may have little familiarity with the reintroduced species or associated management, so will need to learn to live with the species in a ne...
Saved in:
Published in: | Restoration ecology 2023-07, Vol.31 (5), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Auster, Roger E. Puttock, Alan K. Barr, Stewart W. Brazier, Richard E. |
description | In anthropogenic landscapes, wildlife reintroductions are likely to result in interactions between people and reintroduced species. People living in the vicinity may have little familiarity with the reintroduced species or associated management, so will need to learn to live with the species in a new state of “Renewed Coexistence.” In England, Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are being reintroduced and U.K. Government agencies are currently considering their national approach to reintroduction and management. Early indications are this will include requirement for “Beaver Management Groups” (BMGs) to engage with local stakeholders. This policy paper reports on qualitative research that captured lessons from the governance of two existing BMGs in Devon (south‐west England), drawing on both a prior study and new interview data. Through the analysis, we identified that BMGs are not a fixed structure, but an adaptive process. This consists of three stages (Formation, Functioning, and Future?), influenced by resource availability and national policy direction. We argue that, where they are used, Species‐specific Management Groups could provide a “front line” for the integration of reintroduced species into modern landscapes, but their role or remit could be scaled back over time and integrated into existing structures or partnerships to reduce pressure on limited resources, as knowledge of reintroduced species (such as beaver) grows and its presence becomes “normalized.” There must be sufficient flexibility in forthcoming policy to minimize constraint on the adaptive nature of BMGs and similar groups for other reintroduced species, if they are to facilitate a sustainable coexistence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rec.13899 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2837137727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2837137727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYP_oMFTx7S7uxmk403KfUDCoIoeBCWze4kprRJ3E1a-u9NjVfnMnN45n3hIeQa2AyGmXu0MxAqy07IBCRPImDs43S4WQIRz1I4JxchrBkDqZSYkM8VGl9XdUm7hm6qHdJ91X1Rj1Xd-cb1Fh0NLdoKwx3N0ezQ062pTYlbrDta-qZvAzUeqampcabtjhmtbyyGcEnOCrMJePW3p-T9Yfm2eIpWL4_Pi_tVZIXgWWQKiE2SFc44iJHFloHiTkqpciULZcEJRHAsVnkaF7HgiURQueTMQp5ZLqbkZswder97DJ1eN72vh0rNlUhBpClPB-p2pKxvQvBY6NZXW-MPGpg-ytODPP0rb2DnI7uvNnj4H9Svy8X48QPpSnE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837137727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning to live with reintroduced species: beaver management groups are an adaptive process</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Auster, Roger E. ; Puttock, Alan K. ; Barr, Stewart W. ; Brazier, Richard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Auster, Roger E. ; Puttock, Alan K. ; Barr, Stewart W. ; Brazier, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><description>In anthropogenic landscapes, wildlife reintroductions are likely to result in interactions between people and reintroduced species. People living in the vicinity may have little familiarity with the reintroduced species or associated management, so will need to learn to live with the species in a new state of “Renewed Coexistence.” In England, Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are being reintroduced and U.K. Government agencies are currently considering their national approach to reintroduction and management. Early indications are this will include requirement for “Beaver Management Groups” (BMGs) to engage with local stakeholders. This policy paper reports on qualitative research that captured lessons from the governance of two existing BMGs in Devon (south‐west England), drawing on both a prior study and new interview data. Through the analysis, we identified that BMGs are not a fixed structure, but an adaptive process. This consists of three stages (Formation, Functioning, and Future?), influenced by resource availability and national policy direction. We argue that, where they are used, Species‐specific Management Groups could provide a “front line” for the integration of reintroduced species into modern landscapes, but their role or remit could be scaled back over time and integrated into existing structures or partnerships to reduce pressure on limited resources, as knowledge of reintroduced species (such as beaver) grows and its presence becomes “normalized.” There must be sufficient flexibility in forthcoming policy to minimize constraint on the adaptive nature of BMGs and similar groups for other reintroduced species, if they are to facilitate a sustainable coexistence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.13899</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>adaptive management ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic mammals ; Castor fiber ; Coexistence ; engagement ; Familiarity ; Freshwater mammals ; Governance ; Government agencies ; Human influences ; Qualitative research ; Reintroduction ; renewed coexistence ; Resource availability ; Species ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2023-07, Vol.31 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7299-8867</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Auster, Roger E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puttock, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Stewart W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazier, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to live with reintroduced species: beaver management groups are an adaptive process</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>In anthropogenic landscapes, wildlife reintroductions are likely to result in interactions between people and reintroduced species. People living in the vicinity may have little familiarity with the reintroduced species or associated management, so will need to learn to live with the species in a new state of “Renewed Coexistence.” In England, Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are being reintroduced and U.K. Government agencies are currently considering their national approach to reintroduction and management. Early indications are this will include requirement for “Beaver Management Groups” (BMGs) to engage with local stakeholders. This policy paper reports on qualitative research that captured lessons from the governance of two existing BMGs in Devon (south‐west England), drawing on both a prior study and new interview data. Through the analysis, we identified that BMGs are not a fixed structure, but an adaptive process. This consists of three stages (Formation, Functioning, and Future?), influenced by resource availability and national policy direction. We argue that, where they are used, Species‐specific Management Groups could provide a “front line” for the integration of reintroduced species into modern landscapes, but their role or remit could be scaled back over time and integrated into existing structures or partnerships to reduce pressure on limited resources, as knowledge of reintroduced species (such as beaver) grows and its presence becomes “normalized.” There must be sufficient flexibility in forthcoming policy to minimize constraint on the adaptive nature of BMGs and similar groups for other reintroduced species, if they are to facilitate a sustainable coexistence.</description><subject>adaptive management</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Castor fiber</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>engagement</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Freshwater mammals</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reintroduction</subject><subject>renewed coexistence</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYP_oMFTx7S7uxmk403KfUDCoIoeBCWze4kprRJ3E1a-u9NjVfnMnN45n3hIeQa2AyGmXu0MxAqy07IBCRPImDs43S4WQIRz1I4JxchrBkDqZSYkM8VGl9XdUm7hm6qHdJ91X1Rj1Xd-cb1Fh0NLdoKwx3N0ezQ062pTYlbrDta-qZvAzUeqampcabtjhmtbyyGcEnOCrMJePW3p-T9Yfm2eIpWL4_Pi_tVZIXgWWQKiE2SFc44iJHFloHiTkqpciULZcEJRHAsVnkaF7HgiURQueTMQp5ZLqbkZswder97DJ1eN72vh0rNlUhBpClPB-p2pKxvQvBY6NZXW-MPGpg-ytODPP0rb2DnI7uvNnj4H9Svy8X48QPpSnE8</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Auster, Roger E.</creator><creator>Puttock, Alan K.</creator><creator>Barr, Stewart W.</creator><creator>Brazier, Richard E.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-8867</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Learning to live with reintroduced species: beaver management groups are an adaptive process</title><author>Auster, Roger E. ; Puttock, Alan K. ; Barr, Stewart W. ; Brazier, Richard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>adaptive management</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Castor fiber</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>engagement</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Freshwater mammals</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reintroduction</topic><topic>renewed coexistence</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Auster, Roger E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puttock, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Stewart W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazier, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Auster, Roger E.</au><au>Puttock, Alan K.</au><au>Barr, Stewart W.</au><au>Brazier, Richard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning to live with reintroduced species: beaver management groups are an adaptive process</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>In anthropogenic landscapes, wildlife reintroductions are likely to result in interactions between people and reintroduced species. People living in the vicinity may have little familiarity with the reintroduced species or associated management, so will need to learn to live with the species in a new state of “Renewed Coexistence.” In England, Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are being reintroduced and U.K. Government agencies are currently considering their national approach to reintroduction and management. Early indications are this will include requirement for “Beaver Management Groups” (BMGs) to engage with local stakeholders. This policy paper reports on qualitative research that captured lessons from the governance of two existing BMGs in Devon (south‐west England), drawing on both a prior study and new interview data. Through the analysis, we identified that BMGs are not a fixed structure, but an adaptive process. This consists of three stages (Formation, Functioning, and Future?), influenced by resource availability and national policy direction. We argue that, where they are used, Species‐specific Management Groups could provide a “front line” for the integration of reintroduced species into modern landscapes, but their role or remit could be scaled back over time and integrated into existing structures or partnerships to reduce pressure on limited resources, as knowledge of reintroduced species (such as beaver) grows and its presence becomes “normalized.” There must be sufficient flexibility in forthcoming policy to minimize constraint on the adaptive nature of BMGs and similar groups for other reintroduced species, if they are to facilitate a sustainable coexistence.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.13899</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-8867</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2023-07, Vol.31 (5), p.n/a |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2837137727 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | adaptive management Anthropogenic factors Aquatic mammals Castor fiber Coexistence engagement Familiarity Freshwater mammals Governance Government agencies Human influences Qualitative research Reintroduction renewed coexistence Resource availability Species Wildlife Wildlife management |
title | Learning to live with reintroduced species: beaver management groups are an adaptive process |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A49%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20to%20live%20with%20reintroduced%20species:%20beaver%20management%20groups%20are%20an%20adaptive%20process&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Auster,%20Roger%20E.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.13899&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2837137727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-af14a69fdad14e04c0182d5558b85f8c1d3ee1d048b74f43265e18b520c1b9c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837137727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |