Conservation of Chinese Theaceae species under future climate and land use changes

• Published in: Diversity & distributions 2023-08, Vol.29 (8), p.1064-1073
• Main Authors: Zhao, Xuzhe, Wei, Wei, Zhang, Jingjing, Pan, Shan, Che, Qibing, Tang, Junfeng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Climate change; Conservation; Conservation areas; Dispersal; Distribution patterns; Effectiveness; Environmental conditions; Geographical distribution; Land use; Population decline; Precipitation; priority conservation; Protected areas; Protected species; RESEARCH ARTICLE; species distribution models; species richness; Theaceae; threatened; Threatened species; Variables; Wildlife conservation
• ISSN: 1366-9516; 1472-4642
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13744

Aim Climate and land use changes are two major pervasive and growing global causes of rapid changes in the distribution patterns of biodiversity, challenging the future effectiveness of protected areas (PAs), which were mainly designed based on a static view of biodiversity. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas for protecting the species threatened by climate and land use change is critical for future biodiversity conservation. Location China. Methods Here, using distributions of 200 Chinese Theaceae species and ensemble species distribution models, we identified species threatened by future climate and land use change (i.e. species with predicted loss of suitable habitat ≥30%) under scenarios incorporating climate change, land use change and dispersal. We then estimate the richness distribution patterns of threatened species and identify priority conservation areas and conservation gaps of the current PA network. Results Our results suggest that 36.30%–51.85% of Theaceae species will be threatened by future climate and land use conditions and that although the threatened species are mainly distributed at low latitudes in China under both current and future periods, the mean richness of the threatened species per grid cell will decline by 0.826–3.188 species by the 2070s. Moreover, we found that these priority conservation areas are highly fragmented and that the current PA network only covers 14.21%–20.87% of the ‘areas worth exploring’ and 6.91%–7.91% of the ‘areas worth attention’. Main Conclusions Our findings highlight the necessity of establishing new protected areas and ecological corridors in priority conservation areas to protect the threatened species. Moreover, our findings also highlight the importance of taking into consideration the potential threatened species under future climate and land use conditions when designating priority areas for biodiversity conservation.