Evaluation of authoring tools under ATAG and WCAG recommendations

Authoring tools are software programs that allow users to create learning content, lessons, and courses, usually to be used in virtual learning environments. These tools are a reasonable choice for novice users, as they use pre-programmed elements and do not require specific programming skills. Howe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Universal access in the information society 2023-08, Vol.22 (3), p.919-930
Main Authors: Baldiris, Silvia, Vargas, David, Garzón, Juan, Ávila-Garzón, Cecilia, Burgos, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accessibility
Authoring
CAI
Computer assisted instruction
Computer Communication Networks
Computer Science
Computers and Society
Education
Handicapped accessibility
Information Storage and Retrieval
Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
IT in Business
Long Paper
Software
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
Virtual environments
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Authoring tools are software programs that allow users to create learning content, lessons, and courses, usually to be used in virtual learning environments. These tools are a reasonable choice for novice users, as they use pre-programmed elements and do not require specific programming skills. However, they do not always meet accessibility guidelines, nor do they ensure that the educational content generated through them is accessible. This study first evaluates the accessibility of four popular free open-source authoring tools based on the ATAG recommendations. Then it evaluates the accessibility of the educational content generated through them based on the WCAG recommendations. These evaluations allow us to identify the level of accessibility of the authoring tools and their potential to help people with disabilities to become not only consumers but also producers of accessible educational content. We conclude that, while much work remains to be done to ensure accessibility, authoring tools are a potential key to effective social inclusion. Based on the findings of this study, we establish a set of recommendations for stakeholders to help close some gaps regarding accessibility.
ISSN:1615-5289
1615-5297
DOI:10.1007/s10209-022-00904-9