Loading…
Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study
A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced po...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing 2023-07, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. Nasir, Qazi Alajmi, Muzna H. Almaqbali, Khaloud A. |
description | A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes.
Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/amp2.10154 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2838635930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2838635930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1404-65d3f12b0d9b0f839f6779e384ebec0257b3564b9c75f08de1702d9f3747096e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9Kw0AQxhdRsNRefIIFz9H9l93ssZRqC5V4UPC2bJJdSEmyMbtpiSffwTf0SUxTDx6G-THzzTfwAXCL0T1GiDzouiUj4ZhdgBnhVEQM0ffLf3wNFt7v0SjGTHLCZyCsD7rqdShdA52F4ehgW_W18XBvwoja1xp2RufBddCONY1cNfjSnw42JIUH3Y4L3RRwlRKYuzorm8nRw5-vb5i2oazLz_MPH_piuAFXVlfeLP76HLw9rl9Xm2iXPm1Xy13UYoZYxOOCWkwyVMgM2YRKy4WQhibMZCZHJBYZjTnLZC5ii5LCYIFIIS0VTCDJDZ2Du7Nv27mP3vig9q7vmvGlIglNOI0lRaMKn1XHsjKDaruy1t2gMFKnVNUpVTWlqpbPL2Qi-gvcgW1y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838635930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. ; Nasir, Qazi ; Alajmi, Muzna H. ; Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. ; Nasir, Qazi ; Alajmi, Muzna H. ; Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creatorcontrib><description>A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes.
Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2637-403X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2637-403X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/amp2.10154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acetylene ; Argon ; Carbon dioxide ; Chromatography ; Design optimization ; Ethane ; ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene ; Gas chromatography ; Gaussian process ; Hydrogen ; jet plasma ; Machine learning ; Mixtures ; Optimization ; plasma catalytic reactors ; Plasma torches ; Plasmolysis ; Regression models ; Water ; Water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing, 2023-07, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.</rights><rights>2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2697-6602 ; 0000-0002-5642-7957</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Qazi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alajmi, Muzna H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</title><title>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing</title><description>A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes.
Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.</description><subject>Acetylene</subject><subject>Argon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Ethane</subject><subject>ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>jet plasma</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>plasma catalytic reactors</subject><subject>Plasma torches</subject><subject>Plasmolysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><issn>2637-403X</issn><issn>2637-403X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpNkM9Kw0AQxhdRsNRefIIFz9H9l93ssZRqC5V4UPC2bJJdSEmyMbtpiSffwTf0SUxTDx6G-THzzTfwAXCL0T1GiDzouiUj4ZhdgBnhVEQM0ffLf3wNFt7v0SjGTHLCZyCsD7rqdShdA52F4ehgW_W18XBvwoja1xp2RufBddCONY1cNfjSnw42JIUH3Y4L3RRwlRKYuzorm8nRw5-vb5i2oazLz_MPH_piuAFXVlfeLP76HLw9rl9Xm2iXPm1Xy13UYoZYxOOCWkwyVMgM2YRKy4WQhibMZCZHJBYZjTnLZC5ii5LCYIFIIS0VTCDJDZ2Du7Nv27mP3vig9q7vmvGlIglNOI0lRaMKn1XHsjKDaruy1t2gMFKnVNUpVTWlqpbPL2Qi-gvcgW1y</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</creator><creator>Nasir, Qazi</creator><creator>Alajmi, Muzna H.</creator><creator>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope/><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-6602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-7957</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</title><author>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. ; Nasir, Qazi ; Alajmi, Muzna H. ; Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1404-65d3f12b0d9b0f839f6779e384ebec0257b3564b9c75f08de1702d9f3747096e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acetylene</topic><topic>Argon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Ethane</topic><topic>ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>jet plasma</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>plasma catalytic reactors</topic><topic>Plasma torches</topic><topic>Plasmolysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Qazi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alajmi, Muzna H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</au><au>Nasir, Qazi</au><au>Alajmi, Muzna H.</au><au>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing</jtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2637-403X</issn><eissn>2637-403X</eissn><abstract>A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes.
Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/amp2.10154</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-6602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-7957</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2637-403X |
ispartof | Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing, 2023-07, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a |
issn | 2637-403X 2637-403X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2838635930 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Acetylene Argon Carbon dioxide Chromatography Design optimization Ethane ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene Gas chromatography Gaussian process Hydrogen jet plasma Machine learning Mixtures Optimization plasma catalytic reactors Plasma torches Plasmolysis Regression models Water Water vapor |
title | Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A47%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20two%20plumes%20jet%20plasma%20reactor%20for%20plasmolysis%20of%20H2O%20vapor%20and%20CO2%20combinations%20%E2%80%93%20Optimization%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20and%20processing&rft.au=Abdul%E2%80%90Majeed,%20Wameath%20S.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2637-403X&rft.eissn=2637-403X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/amp2.10154&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2838635930%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1404-65d3f12b0d9b0f839f6779e384ebec0257b3564b9c75f08de1702d9f3747096e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838635930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |