Loading…

Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study

A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing 2023-07, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a
Main Authors: Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S., Nasir, Qazi, Alajmi, Muzna H., Almaqbali, Khaloud A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing
container_volume 5
creator Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.
Nasir, Qazi
Alajmi, Muzna H.
Almaqbali, Khaloud A.
description A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes. Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/amp2.10154
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2838635930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2838635930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1404-65d3f12b0d9b0f839f6779e384ebec0257b3564b9c75f08de1702d9f3747096e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9Kw0AQxhdRsNRefIIFz9H9l93ssZRqC5V4UPC2bJJdSEmyMbtpiSffwTf0SUxTDx6G-THzzTfwAXCL0T1GiDzouiUj4ZhdgBnhVEQM0ffLf3wNFt7v0SjGTHLCZyCsD7rqdShdA52F4ehgW_W18XBvwoja1xp2RufBddCONY1cNfjSnw42JIUH3Y4L3RRwlRKYuzorm8nRw5-vb5i2oazLz_MPH_piuAFXVlfeLP76HLw9rl9Xm2iXPm1Xy13UYoZYxOOCWkwyVMgM2YRKy4WQhibMZCZHJBYZjTnLZC5ii5LCYIFIIS0VTCDJDZ2Du7Nv27mP3vig9q7vmvGlIglNOI0lRaMKn1XHsjKDaruy1t2gMFKnVNUpVTWlqpbPL2Qi-gvcgW1y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838635930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. ; Nasir, Qazi ; Alajmi, Muzna H. ; Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. ; Nasir, Qazi ; Alajmi, Muzna H. ; Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creatorcontrib><description>A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes. Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2637-403X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2637-403X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/amp2.10154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acetylene ; Argon ; Carbon dioxide ; Chromatography ; Design optimization ; Ethane ; ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene ; Gas chromatography ; Gaussian process ; Hydrogen ; jet plasma ; Machine learning ; Mixtures ; Optimization ; plasma catalytic reactors ; Plasma torches ; Plasmolysis ; Regression models ; Water ; Water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing, 2023-07, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.</rights><rights>2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2697-6602 ; 0000-0002-5642-7957</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Qazi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alajmi, Muzna H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</title><title>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing</title><description>A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes. Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.</description><subject>Acetylene</subject><subject>Argon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Ethane</subject><subject>ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>jet plasma</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>plasma catalytic reactors</subject><subject>Plasma torches</subject><subject>Plasmolysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><issn>2637-403X</issn><issn>2637-403X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpNkM9Kw0AQxhdRsNRefIIFz9H9l93ssZRqC5V4UPC2bJJdSEmyMbtpiSffwTf0SUxTDx6G-THzzTfwAXCL0T1GiDzouiUj4ZhdgBnhVEQM0ffLf3wNFt7v0SjGTHLCZyCsD7rqdShdA52F4ehgW_W18XBvwoja1xp2RufBddCONY1cNfjSnw42JIUH3Y4L3RRwlRKYuzorm8nRw5-vb5i2oazLz_MPH_piuAFXVlfeLP76HLw9rl9Xm2iXPm1Xy13UYoZYxOOCWkwyVMgM2YRKy4WQhibMZCZHJBYZjTnLZC5ii5LCYIFIIS0VTCDJDZ2Du7Nv27mP3vig9q7vmvGlIglNOI0lRaMKn1XHsjKDaruy1t2gMFKnVNUpVTWlqpbPL2Qi-gvcgW1y</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</creator><creator>Nasir, Qazi</creator><creator>Alajmi, Muzna H.</creator><creator>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope/><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-6602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-7957</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</title><author>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S. ; Nasir, Qazi ; Alajmi, Muzna H. ; Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1404-65d3f12b0d9b0f839f6779e384ebec0257b3564b9c75f08de1702d9f3747096e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acetylene</topic><topic>Argon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Ethane</topic><topic>ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>jet plasma</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>plasma catalytic reactors</topic><topic>Plasma torches</topic><topic>Plasmolysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Qazi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alajmi, Muzna H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdul‐Majeed, Wameath S.</au><au>Nasir, Qazi</au><au>Alajmi, Muzna H.</au><au>Almaqbali, Khaloud A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing</jtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2637-403X</issn><eissn>2637-403X</eissn><abstract>A custom design multi‐flying jet plasma torches (MFJPT) reactor was tested for plasmolysis of water vapor and mixtures of water vapor‐carbon dioxide in a series of experimental investigations at various reactor operational parameters. Experimentation plans were applied within the range of induced power (100–300 watts) and various vapor/gas throughputs. The produced gases were analyzed through online gas chromatography. The results of water vapor plasmolysis in two schemes demonstrated the production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying a water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Valuable hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon, and CO2 mixtures. The experimental data were trained through machine learning and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model has fitted the data quite well. Ultimately, optimization study outcomes are presented through a color heat‐map for system scaling‐up purposes. Plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations were conducted in jet plasma reactor. Results demonstrated production of 1337 ppm of hydrogen from water vapor/argon and 1665 ppm from applying water vapor/argon/CO2 combination. Worthy hydrocarbon gases (e.g., Ethane, Ethylene/Acetylene) were generated and detected at higher conversions upon introducing H2O vapor, argon and CO2 mixtures.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/amp2.10154</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-6602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-7957</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2637-403X
ispartof Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing, 2023-07, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a
issn 2637-403X
2637-403X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2838635930
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Acetylene
Argon
Carbon dioxide
Chromatography
Design optimization
Ethane
ethane‐ethylene‐acetylene
Gas chromatography
Gaussian process
Hydrogen
jet plasma
Machine learning
Mixtures
Optimization
plasma catalytic reactors
Plasma torches
Plasmolysis
Regression models
Water
Water vapor
title Evaluation of two plumes jet plasma reactor for plasmolysis of H2O vapor and CO2 combinations – Optimization study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A47%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20two%20plumes%20jet%20plasma%20reactor%20for%20plasmolysis%20of%20H2O%20vapor%20and%20CO2%20combinations%20%E2%80%93%20Optimization%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20and%20processing&rft.au=Abdul%E2%80%90Majeed,%20Wameath%20S.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2637-403X&rft.eissn=2637-403X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/amp2.10154&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2838635930%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1404-65d3f12b0d9b0f839f6779e384ebec0257b3564b9c75f08de1702d9f3747096e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838635930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true