Loading…
Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework
Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of experimental education 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.718-738 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873 |
container_end_page | 738 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 718 |
container_title | The Journal of experimental education |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Vispoel, Walter P. Lee, Hyeryung Xu, Guanlan Hong, Hyeri |
description | Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2839587605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1395732</ericid><sourcerecordid>2839587605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtP3DAQha0KpC7Qn4BkiedQXzaJ81ZAy00gHqDP1qwvW9NsDGNHaPvrcRTKI_PgGWnOOSN_hBxzdsqZYj8ZE4J1rTwVZShPJ5SU38iCd0tWsUbJPbKYNNUk-k4OUnpmpaRiC7K5GbLbIOQwbOh58GByRHofresTDUOOFOiVGxxCH_7BOvQh7-jTHxdxR88hOUsfM44mj0VAV69jCYrD7J8SLxG27i3i3yOy76FP7sdHPyS_L1dPF9fV3cPVzcXZXWVkw3K19l5YL5Vtl960jViKupbcLlvVdnbNjKhBcCMaxqUAbn0NioGTTQOWKataeUhO5twXjK-jS1k_xxGHclIXKl2t2obVRVXPKoMxJXRev2DYAu40Z3piqv8z1RNT_cG0-I5nn8NgPj2rW16SWynK_te8D4OPuIXy897qDLs-okcYTEhafn3iHWmMh5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839587605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Vispoel, Walter P. ; Lee, Hyeryung ; Xu, Guanlan ; Hong, Hyeri</creator><creatorcontrib>Vispoel, Walter P. ; Lee, Hyeryung ; Xu, Guanlan ; Hong, Hyeri</creatorcontrib><description>Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Routledge</publisher><subject>Bifactor model ; Big Five Inventory ; Educational tests & measurements ; Error of Measurement ; Factor Analysis ; Generalizability Theory ; Personality Measures ; Personality tests ; Programming Languages ; R programming ; Reliability ; Scores ; Structural equation modeling ; Structural Equation Models</subject><ispartof>The Journal of experimental education, 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.718-738</ispartof><rights>2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2022</rights><rights>2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7642-6161 ; 0000-0002-7576-2574 ; 0000-0001-6749-7697 ; 0000-0002-9415-251X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1395732$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vispoel, Walter P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeryung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Hyeri</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</title><title>The Journal of experimental education</title><description>Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.</description><subject>Bifactor model</subject><subject>Big Five Inventory</subject><subject>Educational tests & measurements</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Generalizability Theory</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>R programming</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><issn>0022-0973</issn><issn>1940-0683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtP3DAQha0KpC7Qn4BkiedQXzaJ81ZAy00gHqDP1qwvW9NsDGNHaPvrcRTKI_PgGWnOOSN_hBxzdsqZYj8ZE4J1rTwVZShPJ5SU38iCd0tWsUbJPbKYNNUk-k4OUnpmpaRiC7K5GbLbIOQwbOh58GByRHofresTDUOOFOiVGxxCH_7BOvQh7-jTHxdxR88hOUsfM44mj0VAV69jCYrD7J8SLxG27i3i3yOy76FP7sdHPyS_L1dPF9fV3cPVzcXZXWVkw3K19l5YL5Vtl960jViKupbcLlvVdnbNjKhBcCMaxqUAbn0NioGTTQOWKataeUhO5twXjK-jS1k_xxGHclIXKl2t2obVRVXPKoMxJXRev2DYAu40Z3piqv8z1RNT_cG0-I5nn8NgPj2rW16SWynK_te8D4OPuIXy897qDLs-okcYTEhafn3iHWmMh5U</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Vispoel, Walter P.</creator><creator>Lee, Hyeryung</creator><creator>Xu, Guanlan</creator><creator>Hong, Hyeri</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-6161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-2574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-7697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-251X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</title><author>Vispoel, Walter P. ; Lee, Hyeryung ; Xu, Guanlan ; Hong, Hyeri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bifactor model</topic><topic>Big Five Inventory</topic><topic>Educational tests & measurements</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Generalizability Theory</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>R programming</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vispoel, Walter P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeryung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Hyeri</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of experimental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vispoel, Walter P.</au><au>Lee, Hyeryung</au><au>Xu, Guanlan</au><au>Hong, Hyeri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1395732</ericid><atitle>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of experimental education</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>718-738</pages><issn>0022-0973</issn><eissn>1940-0683</eissn><abstract>Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-6161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-2574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-7697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-251X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0973 |
ispartof | The Journal of experimental education, 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.718-738 |
issn | 0022-0973 1940-0683 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2839587605 |
source | ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Bifactor model Big Five Inventory Educational tests & measurements Error of Measurement Factor Analysis Generalizability Theory Personality Measures Personality tests Programming Languages R programming Reliability Scores Structural equation modeling Structural Equation Models |
title | Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Bifactor%20Models%20into%20a%20Generalizability%20Theory%20Based%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling%20Framework&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20experimental%20education&rft.au=Vispoel,%20Walter%20P.&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=718-738&rft.issn=0022-0973&rft.eissn=1940-0683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2839587605%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839587605&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1395732&rfr_iscdi=true |