Loading…

Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework

Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of experimental education 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.718-738
Main Authors: Vispoel, Walter P., Lee, Hyeryung, Xu, Guanlan, Hong, Hyeri
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873
container_end_page 738
container_issue 4
container_start_page 718
container_title The Journal of experimental education
container_volume 91
creator Vispoel, Walter P.
Lee, Hyeryung
Xu, Guanlan
Hong, Hyeri
description Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2839587605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1395732</ericid><sourcerecordid>2839587605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtP3DAQha0KpC7Qn4BkiedQXzaJ81ZAy00gHqDP1qwvW9NsDGNHaPvrcRTKI_PgGWnOOSN_hBxzdsqZYj8ZE4J1rTwVZShPJ5SU38iCd0tWsUbJPbKYNNUk-k4OUnpmpaRiC7K5GbLbIOQwbOh58GByRHofresTDUOOFOiVGxxCH_7BOvQh7-jTHxdxR88hOUsfM44mj0VAV69jCYrD7J8SLxG27i3i3yOy76FP7sdHPyS_L1dPF9fV3cPVzcXZXWVkw3K19l5YL5Vtl960jViKupbcLlvVdnbNjKhBcCMaxqUAbn0NioGTTQOWKataeUhO5twXjK-jS1k_xxGHclIXKl2t2obVRVXPKoMxJXRev2DYAu40Z3piqv8z1RNT_cG0-I5nn8NgPj2rW16SWynK_te8D4OPuIXy897qDLs-okcYTEhafn3iHWmMh5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839587605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Vispoel, Walter P. ; Lee, Hyeryung ; Xu, Guanlan ; Hong, Hyeri</creator><creatorcontrib>Vispoel, Walter P. ; Lee, Hyeryung ; Xu, Guanlan ; Hong, Hyeri</creatorcontrib><description>Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Routledge</publisher><subject>Bifactor model ; Big Five Inventory ; Educational tests &amp; measurements ; Error of Measurement ; Factor Analysis ; Generalizability Theory ; Personality Measures ; Personality tests ; Programming Languages ; R programming ; Reliability ; Scores ; Structural equation modeling ; Structural Equation Models</subject><ispartof>The Journal of experimental education, 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.718-738</ispartof><rights>2022 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2022</rights><rights>2022 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7642-6161 ; 0000-0002-7576-2574 ; 0000-0001-6749-7697 ; 0000-0002-9415-251X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1395732$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vispoel, Walter P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeryung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Hyeri</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</title><title>The Journal of experimental education</title><description>Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.</description><subject>Bifactor model</subject><subject>Big Five Inventory</subject><subject>Educational tests &amp; measurements</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Generalizability Theory</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>R programming</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><issn>0022-0973</issn><issn>1940-0683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtP3DAQha0KpC7Qn4BkiedQXzaJ81ZAy00gHqDP1qwvW9NsDGNHaPvrcRTKI_PgGWnOOSN_hBxzdsqZYj8ZE4J1rTwVZShPJ5SU38iCd0tWsUbJPbKYNNUk-k4OUnpmpaRiC7K5GbLbIOQwbOh58GByRHofresTDUOOFOiVGxxCH_7BOvQh7-jTHxdxR88hOUsfM44mj0VAV69jCYrD7J8SLxG27i3i3yOy76FP7sdHPyS_L1dPF9fV3cPVzcXZXWVkw3K19l5YL5Vtl960jViKupbcLlvVdnbNjKhBcCMaxqUAbn0NioGTTQOWKataeUhO5twXjK-jS1k_xxGHclIXKl2t2obVRVXPKoMxJXRev2DYAu40Z3piqv8z1RNT_cG0-I5nn8NgPj2rW16SWynK_te8D4OPuIXy897qDLs-okcYTEhafn3iHWmMh5U</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Vispoel, Walter P.</creator><creator>Lee, Hyeryung</creator><creator>Xu, Guanlan</creator><creator>Hong, Hyeri</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-6161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-2574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-7697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-251X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</title><author>Vispoel, Walter P. ; Lee, Hyeryung ; Xu, Guanlan ; Hong, Hyeri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bifactor model</topic><topic>Big Five Inventory</topic><topic>Educational tests &amp; measurements</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Generalizability Theory</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>R programming</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vispoel, Walter P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeryung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guanlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Hyeri</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of experimental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vispoel, Walter P.</au><au>Lee, Hyeryung</au><au>Xu, Guanlan</au><au>Hong, Hyeri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1395732</ericid><atitle>Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of experimental education</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>718-738</pages><issn>0022-0973</issn><eissn>1940-0683</eissn><abstract>Although generalizability theory (GT) designs have traditionally been analyzed within an ANOVA framework, identical results can be obtained with structural equation models (SEMs) but extended to represent multiple sources of both systematic and measurement error variance, include estimation methods less likely to produce negative variance components, and correct for score coarseness. In research reported here, we integrated principles of bifactor modeling into a GT-SEM framework to partition systematic variance for subscale and composite scores into general and group factor effects and measurement error into multiple components. GT-bifactor modeling allowed for partitioning of variance at different levels of aggregation, clearer definitions of constructs within sampled domains, extended indices of score consistency, insights into composite and subscale score viability, and markers for best enhancing score consistency. Results for domain and facet scores from the recently updated form of the Big Five Inventory highlighted the importance of taking all sources of measurement error into account and the diagnostic benefits of GT-bifactor designs over conventional univariate and multivariate GT designs. Findings further revealed that corrections for scale coarseness noticeably enhanced overall score consistency by reducing specific-factor and random-response measurement error. We provide code in R for applying all illustrated designs in a detailed online supplement.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-6161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-2574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-7697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-251X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0973
ispartof The Journal of experimental education, 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.718-738
issn 0022-0973
1940-0683
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2839587605
source ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Bifactor model
Big Five Inventory
Educational tests & measurements
Error of Measurement
Factor Analysis
Generalizability Theory
Personality Measures
Personality tests
Programming Languages
R programming
Reliability
Scores
Structural equation modeling
Structural Equation Models
title Integrating Bifactor Models into a Generalizability Theory Based Structural Equation Modeling Framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Bifactor%20Models%20into%20a%20Generalizability%20Theory%20Based%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling%20Framework&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20experimental%20education&rft.au=Vispoel,%20Walter%20P.&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=718-738&rft.issn=0022-0973&rft.eissn=1940-0683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2839587605%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-bff2df38d74fc762425531d47879db0c25a21c260132a1df5a80ae366ad08d873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839587605&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1395732&rfr_iscdi=true