Loading…

Parametric Study of the Stress–Strain Relationships for Plane Strain Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity

A study was conducted of the parameters involved in predicting the average stresses and strains developed in the soil surrounding the probe during the pressuremeter testing. Both elastic and plastic stress–strain responses of the soil were studied. The results are presented in convenient plots which...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geotechnical and geological engineering 2023-09, Vol.41 (7), p.4083-4094
Main Authors: Cosentino, Paul J., Shaban, Alaa M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3
container_end_page 4094
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4083
container_title Geotechnical and geological engineering
container_volume 41
creator Cosentino, Paul J.
Shaban, Alaa M.
description A study was conducted of the parameters involved in predicting the average stresses and strains developed in the soil surrounding the probe during the pressuremeter testing. Both elastic and plastic stress–strain responses of the soil were studied. The results are presented in convenient plots which will enable practitioners to predict the average strains in the elastic zone and the average stresses in the plastic zone and to compare these strains and stresses with stress–strain responses from laboratory direct shear and triaxial tests. A wide range of soil parameters were utilized in theoretical analyses to represent the characteristics of cohesive soils, cohesionless soils, and soils with both friction and cohesion properties. The results indicate that the average strain in the elastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 10 to 32% of the hoop strain at the test boring cavity wall and that the average stress in the plastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 16 to 60% of the radial stress at the test boring cavity wall.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10706-023-02509-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2842292999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2842292999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6M7by8RFF5SJWoeKytiWPTVGlS7BSRHf_AH_IluA0SOxajmdGce0e6hJwzuGQA2ZVnkEEaARehEpARPyATlmQiYgmXh2QCMoVIsJwfkxPvVwDAU2ATslygw7XpXa3pU7-tBtpZ2i9NWJzx_vvzKwxYt_TRNNjXXeuX9cZT2zm6aLDdc7vz7GODrQ_3nR5pMTR1WwVTbGiB73U_nJIji403Z799Sl5uZs_FXTR_uL0vrueRFkz2UcxLXVYgbSqSTMYxCglVynWucyvTDFMRxylaIVnJweRcIpQ5amFLmyWZRjElF6PvxnVvW-N7teq2rg0vFc9jziWXUgaKj5R2nffOWLVx9RrdoBioXaJqTFSFRNU-UcWDSIwiH-D21bg_639UPwtKepQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2842292999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parametric Study of the Stress–Strain Relationships for Plane Strain Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Cosentino, Paul J. ; Shaban, Alaa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cosentino, Paul J. ; Shaban, Alaa M.</creatorcontrib><description>A study was conducted of the parameters involved in predicting the average stresses and strains developed in the soil surrounding the probe during the pressuremeter testing. Both elastic and plastic stress–strain responses of the soil were studied. The results are presented in convenient plots which will enable practitioners to predict the average strains in the elastic zone and the average stresses in the plastic zone and to compare these strains and stresses with stress–strain responses from laboratory direct shear and triaxial tests. A wide range of soil parameters were utilized in theoretical analyses to represent the characteristics of cohesive soils, cohesionless soils, and soils with both friction and cohesion properties. The results indicate that the average strain in the elastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 10 to 32% of the hoop strain at the test boring cavity wall and that the average stress in the plastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 16 to 60% of the radial stress at the test boring cavity wall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10706-023-02509-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Cohesion ; Cohesionless soils ; Cohesive soils ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Laboratories ; Original Paper ; Parameters ; Parametric statistics ; Plane strain ; Plastic zones ; Plastics ; Soil ; Stress-strain relationships ; Stresses ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Triaxial tests ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2023-09, Vol.41 (7), p.4083-4094</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9463-2038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cosentino, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaban, Alaa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Parametric Study of the Stress–Strain Relationships for Plane Strain Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity</title><title>Geotechnical and geological engineering</title><addtitle>Geotech Geol Eng</addtitle><description>A study was conducted of the parameters involved in predicting the average stresses and strains developed in the soil surrounding the probe during the pressuremeter testing. Both elastic and plastic stress–strain responses of the soil were studied. The results are presented in convenient plots which will enable practitioners to predict the average strains in the elastic zone and the average stresses in the plastic zone and to compare these strains and stresses with stress–strain responses from laboratory direct shear and triaxial tests. A wide range of soil parameters were utilized in theoretical analyses to represent the characteristics of cohesive soils, cohesionless soils, and soils with both friction and cohesion properties. The results indicate that the average strain in the elastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 10 to 32% of the hoop strain at the test boring cavity wall and that the average stress in the plastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 16 to 60% of the radial stress at the test boring cavity wall.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Cohesion</subject><subject>Cohesionless soils</subject><subject>Cohesive soils</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Parametric statistics</subject><subject>Plane strain</subject><subject>Plastic zones</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Stress-strain relationships</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Triaxial tests</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>0960-3182</issn><issn>1573-1529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6M7by8RFF5SJWoeKytiWPTVGlS7BSRHf_AH_IluA0SOxajmdGce0e6hJwzuGQA2ZVnkEEaARehEpARPyATlmQiYgmXh2QCMoVIsJwfkxPvVwDAU2ATslygw7XpXa3pU7-tBtpZ2i9NWJzx_vvzKwxYt_TRNNjXXeuX9cZT2zm6aLDdc7vz7GODrQ_3nR5pMTR1WwVTbGiB73U_nJIji403Z799Sl5uZs_FXTR_uL0vrueRFkz2UcxLXVYgbSqSTMYxCglVynWucyvTDFMRxylaIVnJweRcIpQ5amFLmyWZRjElF6PvxnVvW-N7teq2rg0vFc9jziWXUgaKj5R2nffOWLVx9RrdoBioXaJqTFSFRNU-UcWDSIwiH-D21bg_639UPwtKepQ</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Cosentino, Paul J.</creator><creator>Shaban, Alaa M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-2038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Parametric Study of the Stress–Strain Relationships for Plane Strain Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity</title><author>Cosentino, Paul J. ; Shaban, Alaa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Cohesion</topic><topic>Cohesionless soils</topic><topic>Cohesive soils</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Parametric statistics</topic><topic>Plane strain</topic><topic>Plastic zones</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Stress-strain relationships</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Triaxial tests</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cosentino, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaban, Alaa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>Geotechnical and geological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cosentino, Paul J.</au><au>Shaban, Alaa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parametric Study of the Stress–Strain Relationships for Plane Strain Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity</atitle><jtitle>Geotechnical and geological engineering</jtitle><stitle>Geotech Geol Eng</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4083</spage><epage>4094</epage><pages>4083-4094</pages><issn>0960-3182</issn><eissn>1573-1529</eissn><abstract>A study was conducted of the parameters involved in predicting the average stresses and strains developed in the soil surrounding the probe during the pressuremeter testing. Both elastic and plastic stress–strain responses of the soil were studied. The results are presented in convenient plots which will enable practitioners to predict the average strains in the elastic zone and the average stresses in the plastic zone and to compare these strains and stresses with stress–strain responses from laboratory direct shear and triaxial tests. A wide range of soil parameters were utilized in theoretical analyses to represent the characteristics of cohesive soils, cohesionless soils, and soils with both friction and cohesion properties. The results indicate that the average strain in the elastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 10 to 32% of the hoop strain at the test boring cavity wall and that the average stress in the plastic zone of soil surrounding the pressuremeter ranges from 16 to 60% of the radial stress at the test boring cavity wall.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10706-023-02509-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-2038</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-3182
ispartof Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2023-09, Vol.41 (7), p.4083-4094
issn 0960-3182
1573-1529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2842292999
source Springer Link
subjects Civil Engineering
Cohesion
Cohesionless soils
Cohesive soils
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Laboratories
Original Paper
Parameters
Parametric statistics
Plane strain
Plastic zones
Plastics
Soil
Stress-strain relationships
Stresses
Terrestrial Pollution
Triaxial tests
Waste Management/Waste Technology
title Parametric Study of the Stress–Strain Relationships for Plane Strain Expansion of a Cylindrical Cavity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parametric%20Study%20of%20the%20Stress%E2%80%93Strain%20Relationships%20for%20Plane%20Strain%20Expansion%20of%20a%20Cylindrical%20Cavity&rft.jtitle=Geotechnical%20and%20geological%20engineering&rft.au=Cosentino,%20Paul%20J.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4083&rft.epage=4094&rft.pages=4083-4094&rft.issn=0960-3182&rft.eissn=1573-1529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10706-023-02509-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2842292999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-42bcbd09f6357944a390d62c8c8f967a63446af391b20e829a0b8ac3fbf757ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2842292999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true