Loading…
Cement Stabilized Soil Field Samples: Quality Control for Bases and Sub-bases
Quality control assessment of cemented pavement layers typically involves extracting cores and subjecting them to unconfined compression tests. This research focuses on evaluating the applicability of the porosity/cement (η/C iv ) index in field pavement projects. The study investigates wetting–dryi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geotechnical and geological engineering 2023-09, Vol.41 (7), p.4169-4184 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53 |
container_end_page | 4184 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 4169 |
container_title | Geotechnical and geological engineering |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Bittar Marin, Eduardo José Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro Tebechrani Neto, Aziz Consoli, Nilo Cesar |
description | Quality control assessment of cemented pavement layers typically involves extracting cores and subjecting them to unconfined compression tests. This research focuses on evaluating the applicability of the porosity/cement (η/C
iv
) index in field pavement projects. The study investigates wetting–drying accumulated loss of mass and unconfined compression tests on soil–cement cores that were mixed, compacted, and cured in field layers. The field layers consist of a sand-Portland cement blends with varying dry unit weights (18.5 kN/m
3
and 19.5 kN/m
3
) and cement contents (3%, 5%, and 7%). These results are then compared with laboratory samples of similar characteristics. The findings reveal, for the first time, that the η/C
iv
index is a suitable parameter for assessing both durability and strength of compacted sand-Portland cement layers in the field. Furthermore, the study highlights that durability tests are less sensitive to sample extraction procedures compared to unconfined compression tests. Consequently, there is a risk of inadequate representation of the true field performance of cemented-stabilized materials when using unconfined compression tests on small diameter core samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10706-023-02514-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2842293632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2842293632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngOTqTbJJdb7pYFSoi7T1s2ols2e7WZPegT-_WCt48DDMD3_wDH2OXCNcIYG8SggUjQKqxNGZCH7EJaqsEalkcswkUBoTCXJ6ys5Q2ACAN4IS9lLSltueLvvJ1U3_Rmi-6uuGzmppxrLa7htItfxuqpu4_edm1fewaHrrI76tEiVftiA1e-P12zk5C1SS6-O1Ttpw9LMsnMX99fC7v5mKlsOiFNeRzBOPRK8ol2ozC2tvVmgANBIVKk7UFBiulVuSBvPGBMNOQmaDVlF0dYnex-xgo9W7TDbEdPzqZZ1IWyig5UvJArWKXUqTgdrHeVvHTIbi9NXew5kZr7sea20erw1Ea4fad4l_0P1ffoftuIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2842293632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cement Stabilized Soil Field Samples: Quality Control for Bases and Sub-bases</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José ; Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro ; Tebechrani Neto, Aziz ; Consoli, Nilo Cesar</creator><creatorcontrib>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José ; Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro ; Tebechrani Neto, Aziz ; Consoli, Nilo Cesar</creatorcontrib><description>Quality control assessment of cemented pavement layers typically involves extracting cores and subjecting them to unconfined compression tests. This research focuses on evaluating the applicability of the porosity/cement (η/C
iv
) index in field pavement projects. The study investigates wetting–drying accumulated loss of mass and unconfined compression tests on soil–cement cores that were mixed, compacted, and cured in field layers. The field layers consist of a sand-Portland cement blends with varying dry unit weights (18.5 kN/m
3
and 19.5 kN/m
3
) and cement contents (3%, 5%, and 7%). These results are then compared with laboratory samples of similar characteristics. The findings reveal, for the first time, that the η/C
iv
index is a suitable parameter for assessing both durability and strength of compacted sand-Portland cement layers in the field. Furthermore, the study highlights that durability tests are less sensitive to sample extraction procedures compared to unconfined compression tests. Consequently, there is a risk of inadequate representation of the true field performance of cemented-stabilized materials when using unconfined compression tests on small diameter core samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10706-023-02514-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Cement ; Civil Engineering ; Compression ; Compression tests ; Concrete ; Cores ; Drying ; Durability ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Extraction procedures ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Original Paper ; Pavements ; Porosity ; Portland cement ; Portland cements ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Sand ; Soil compaction ; Soil porosity ; Soil stabilization ; Soils ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Tests ; Toughness ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2023-09, Vol.41 (7), p.4169-4184</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6408-451X ; 0000-0002-4732-4171 ; 0000-0002-1377-7965 ; 0000-0002-6580-3184</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebechrani Neto, Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consoli, Nilo Cesar</creatorcontrib><title>Cement Stabilized Soil Field Samples: Quality Control for Bases and Sub-bases</title><title>Geotechnical and geological engineering</title><addtitle>Geotech Geol Eng</addtitle><description>Quality control assessment of cemented pavement layers typically involves extracting cores and subjecting them to unconfined compression tests. This research focuses on evaluating the applicability of the porosity/cement (η/C
iv
) index in field pavement projects. The study investigates wetting–drying accumulated loss of mass and unconfined compression tests on soil–cement cores that were mixed, compacted, and cured in field layers. The field layers consist of a sand-Portland cement blends with varying dry unit weights (18.5 kN/m
3
and 19.5 kN/m
3
) and cement contents (3%, 5%, and 7%). These results are then compared with laboratory samples of similar characteristics. The findings reveal, for the first time, that the η/C
iv
index is a suitable parameter for assessing both durability and strength of compacted sand-Portland cement layers in the field. Furthermore, the study highlights that durability tests are less sensitive to sample extraction procedures compared to unconfined compression tests. Consequently, there is a risk of inadequate representation of the true field performance of cemented-stabilized materials when using unconfined compression tests on small diameter core samples.</description><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Durability</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Extraction procedures</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pavements</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Portland cement</subject><subject>Portland cements</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil porosity</subject><subject>Soil stabilization</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Toughness</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>0960-3182</issn><issn>1573-1529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngOTqTbJJdb7pYFSoi7T1s2ols2e7WZPegT-_WCt48DDMD3_wDH2OXCNcIYG8SggUjQKqxNGZCH7EJaqsEalkcswkUBoTCXJ6ys5Q2ACAN4IS9lLSltueLvvJ1U3_Rmi-6uuGzmppxrLa7htItfxuqpu4_edm1fewaHrrI76tEiVftiA1e-P12zk5C1SS6-O1Ttpw9LMsnMX99fC7v5mKlsOiFNeRzBOPRK8ol2ozC2tvVmgANBIVKk7UFBiulVuSBvPGBMNOQmaDVlF0dYnex-xgo9W7TDbEdPzqZZ1IWyig5UvJArWKXUqTgdrHeVvHTIbi9NXew5kZr7sea20erw1Ea4fad4l_0P1ffoftuIA</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José</creator><creator>Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro</creator><creator>Tebechrani Neto, Aziz</creator><creator>Consoli, Nilo Cesar</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6408-451X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4732-4171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-7965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-3184</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Cement Stabilized Soil Field Samples: Quality Control for Bases and Sub-bases</title><author>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José ; Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro ; Tebechrani Neto, Aziz ; Consoli, Nilo Cesar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Durability</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Extraction procedures</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pavements</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Portland cement</topic><topic>Portland cements</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil porosity</topic><topic>Soil stabilization</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Toughness</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebechrani Neto, Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consoli, Nilo Cesar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Geotechnical and geological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bittar Marin, Eduardo José</au><au>Quiñónez Samaniego, Rubén Alejandro</au><au>Tebechrani Neto, Aziz</au><au>Consoli, Nilo Cesar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cement Stabilized Soil Field Samples: Quality Control for Bases and Sub-bases</atitle><jtitle>Geotechnical and geological engineering</jtitle><stitle>Geotech Geol Eng</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4169</spage><epage>4184</epage><pages>4169-4184</pages><issn>0960-3182</issn><eissn>1573-1529</eissn><abstract>Quality control assessment of cemented pavement layers typically involves extracting cores and subjecting them to unconfined compression tests. This research focuses on evaluating the applicability of the porosity/cement (η/C
iv
) index in field pavement projects. The study investigates wetting–drying accumulated loss of mass and unconfined compression tests on soil–cement cores that were mixed, compacted, and cured in field layers. The field layers consist of a sand-Portland cement blends with varying dry unit weights (18.5 kN/m
3
and 19.5 kN/m
3
) and cement contents (3%, 5%, and 7%). These results are then compared with laboratory samples of similar characteristics. The findings reveal, for the first time, that the η/C
iv
index is a suitable parameter for assessing both durability and strength of compacted sand-Portland cement layers in the field. Furthermore, the study highlights that durability tests are less sensitive to sample extraction procedures compared to unconfined compression tests. Consequently, there is a risk of inadequate representation of the true field performance of cemented-stabilized materials when using unconfined compression tests on small diameter core samples.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10706-023-02514-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6408-451X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4732-4171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-7965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-3184</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3182 |
ispartof | Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2023-09, Vol.41 (7), p.4169-4184 |
issn | 0960-3182 1573-1529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2842293632 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Cement Civil Engineering Compression Compression tests Concrete Cores Drying Durability Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Extraction procedures Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Original Paper Pavements Porosity Portland cement Portland cements Quality assessment Quality control Sand Soil compaction Soil porosity Soil stabilization Soils Terrestrial Pollution Tests Toughness Waste Management/Waste Technology |
title | Cement Stabilized Soil Field Samples: Quality Control for Bases and Sub-bases |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cement%20Stabilized%20Soil%20Field%20Samples:%20Quality%20Control%20for%20Bases%20and%20Sub-bases&rft.jtitle=Geotechnical%20and%20geological%20engineering&rft.au=Bittar%20Marin,%20Eduardo%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4169&rft.epage=4184&rft.pages=4169-4184&rft.issn=0960-3182&rft.eissn=1573-1529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10706-023-02514-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2842293632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-76eb8106b1b3e82174efdb7cde0160f3135e7791f72253eb0eb6bfe145046f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2842293632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |