Pecan Biomass and Dairy Manure Utilization: Compost Treatment and Soil In-Situ Comparisons of Selected Pecan Crop and Soil Variables

• Published in: Processes 2023-07, Vol.11 (7), p.2046
• Main Authors: Creegan, Emily F., Flynn, Robert, Brewer, Catherine E., Heerema, Richard J., Darapuneni, Murali, Velasco-Cruz, Ciro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Beans; Biomass; Calcium nitrate; Carbon; Carbon sequestration; Composting; Composts; Copper; Cultivars; Dairy industry; Decision making; Electrical conductivity; Electrical resistivity; Farms; Hydroxyapatite; Impact analysis; Iron; Landscaping; Leaves; Legumes; Magnesium; Manganese; Manures; Mimosaceae; Nut industry; Nutrient content; Organic matter; Organic wastes; Phosphorus; Plants (botany); Sodium; Soil amendment; Soil analysis; Soil layers; Soil properties; Trees; Water potential; Yard waste
• ISSN: 2227-9717; 2227-9717
• DOI: 10.3390/pr11072046

A compost program was developed on-farm, utilizing tree trimming biomass from a commercial pecan farm comprised of 14-year-old improved cultivar Western Schley pecan (Carya illinoinensis) tree stands. The direct soil application of shredded pecan tree biomass (P) and dairy manure (M) served as a standard on-farm practice. Three composts were produced using P and M with varying levels of other inputs and processing. The PM compost contained only P and M and its production included only weekly turning and watering. The other two composts included P, M, unfinished compost, and clay inputs, and either additional landscaping residues (A) (designated PM/A compost) or “green chop” (on-farm grown legumes, G) (designated PMG/A compost); production of PM/A and PMG/A composts included additional processing steps intended to improve compost quality per the recommendations of a compost consulting company. Soil samples were taken at three depths (0–15 cm, 15–30 cm, 30–61 cm) in November 2017 from the 1.3 ha study plot of trees. The standard practice and compost treatments were applied at approximately 18 t/ha in January 2018 and 2019 at a 15 cm depth. Soils were re-sampled at the end of the two-year study. Composts and soils were analyzed for: pH, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), electrical conductivity, and total carbon, organic matter, magnesium, calcium, sodium, nitrate-N, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), available phosphorus, potassium, zinc, manganese, iron, and copper contents. Pecan tree leaf nutrient content, stem water potential, and leaf greenness were also measured one and two years after soil amendment application. While increases in several soil properties were observed with the treatments, only available phosphorus content was significantly different between pre and post at all depths. Electrical conductivity, TKN, Fe, Cu, SAR, and Na content showed significant differences in the upper soil layers. No differences in leaf properties were observed. This suggests that there are minimal differences in the outcomes for compost application compared to in-situ biomass application; additional compost inputs and processing did not provide additional short-term soil or plant benefits for pecan tree production. More work is needed to determine if there are long-term benefits to soil quality, plant health and performance, or carbon sequestration that impact the economic and environmental decision-making processes for composting and application of local organic wastes.