Loading…

Do Shallow Rental Subsidies Promote Housing Stability? Evidence on Costs and Effects from DC’s Flexible Program

Residents of cities face housing instability due to high housing costs. We conduct a randomized experiment evaluating the impacts of a flexible “shallow subsidy” among 668 qualified renters with recent housing instability. This local subsidy provides $7,200 a year directly to families earning less t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Calif.), 2023-09, Vol.59 (5), p.1530-1566
Main Authors: Alva, Maria L., Mammo, Natnaell, Moore, Ryan T., Quinney, Samuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d445acee22ed7e875741fad3ad5b68e573f5724168e104253e61c2e9c2febd3f3
container_end_page 1566
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1530
container_title Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
container_volume 59
creator Alva, Maria L.
Mammo, Natnaell
Moore, Ryan T.
Quinney, Samuel
description Residents of cities face housing instability due to high housing costs. We conduct a randomized experiment evaluating the impacts of a flexible “shallow subsidy” among 668 qualified renters with recent housing instability. This local subsidy provides $7,200 a year directly to families earning less than 30 percent of the median family income, who choose how much assistance to use each month. Using administrative data, we track outcomes for the first year of program administration. After one year, the program has no statistically significant effect on homelessness, cash benefit receipt, or emergency rental assistance utilization, demonstrating no harm when compared to alternatives. However, the program leads to a 29 percentage point decrease in participants’ use of other types of local government housing services, which they must weigh against the shallow subsidy. We show that the program can be administratively cost-saving, but is not always beneficial for a very low-income subset of applicants.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10780874221111140
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2844591929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10780874221111140</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2844591929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d445acee22ed7e875741fad3ad5b68e573f5724168e104253e61c2e9c2febd3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFKwzAUhoMoOKcP4F3A62qSNkt7JdJtThgoTq9L2pzMjK7Zklbdna_h6_kkpkzwQjw354fz_9-BH6FzSi4pFeKKEpGSVCSM0X4ScoAGlHMWpXHMDoMO96g3HKMT71eEEEYyPkDbscWLF1nX9g0_QtPKGi-60htlwOMHZ9e2BTyznTfNEi9aWZratLtrPHk1CpoKsG1wbn3rsWwUnmgNVdA6BPE4__r49Hhaw7spa-hpSyfXp-hIy9rD2c8eoufp5CmfRfP727v8Zh5VLBNtpJKEywqAMVACUsFFQrVUsVS8HKXARay5YAkNmpKE8RhGtGKQVUxDqWIdD9HFnrtxdtuBb4uV7VwTXhYsDfCMZiwLLrp3Vc5670AXG2fW0u0KSoq-2eJPsyFzuc94uYRf6v-Bb15peUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844591929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Shallow Rental Subsidies Promote Housing Stability? Evidence on Costs and Effects from DC’s Flexible Program</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Alva, Maria L. ; Mammo, Natnaell ; Moore, Ryan T. ; Quinney, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Alva, Maria L. ; Mammo, Natnaell ; Moore, Ryan T. ; Quinney, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>Residents of cities face housing instability due to high housing costs. We conduct a randomized experiment evaluating the impacts of a flexible “shallow subsidy” among 668 qualified renters with recent housing instability. This local subsidy provides $7,200 a year directly to families earning less than 30 percent of the median family income, who choose how much assistance to use each month. Using administrative data, we track outcomes for the first year of program administration. After one year, the program has no statistically significant effect on homelessness, cash benefit receipt, or emergency rental assistance utilization, demonstrating no harm when compared to alternatives. However, the program leads to a 29 percentage point decrease in participants’ use of other types of local government housing services, which they must weigh against the shallow subsidy. We show that the program can be administratively cost-saving, but is not always beneficial for a very low-income subset of applicants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10780874221111140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alternative approaches ; Applicants ; Direct payments ; Families &amp; family life ; First year ; Homeless people ; Homelessness ; Housing ; Housing costs ; Income ; Local government ; Low income groups ; Public administration ; Residents ; Stability ; Stability analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Subsidies ; Tenants</subject><ispartof>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023-09, Vol.59 (5), p.1530-1566</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d445acee22ed7e875741fad3ad5b68e573f5724168e104253e61c2e9c2febd3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0989-2730</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alva, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammo, Natnaell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinney, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>Do Shallow Rental Subsidies Promote Housing Stability? Evidence on Costs and Effects from DC’s Flexible Program</title><title>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Urban Affairs Review</addtitle><description>Residents of cities face housing instability due to high housing costs. We conduct a randomized experiment evaluating the impacts of a flexible “shallow subsidy” among 668 qualified renters with recent housing instability. This local subsidy provides $7,200 a year directly to families earning less than 30 percent of the median family income, who choose how much assistance to use each month. Using administrative data, we track outcomes for the first year of program administration. After one year, the program has no statistically significant effect on homelessness, cash benefit receipt, or emergency rental assistance utilization, demonstrating no harm when compared to alternatives. However, the program leads to a 29 percentage point decrease in participants’ use of other types of local government housing services, which they must weigh against the shallow subsidy. We show that the program can be administratively cost-saving, but is not always beneficial for a very low-income subset of applicants.</description><subject>Alternative approaches</subject><subject>Applicants</subject><subject>Direct payments</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>First year</subject><subject>Homeless people</subject><subject>Homelessness</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing costs</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tenants</subject><issn>1078-0874</issn><issn>1552-8332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFKwzAUhoMoOKcP4F3A62qSNkt7JdJtThgoTq9L2pzMjK7Zklbdna_h6_kkpkzwQjw354fz_9-BH6FzSi4pFeKKEpGSVCSM0X4ScoAGlHMWpXHMDoMO96g3HKMT71eEEEYyPkDbscWLF1nX9g0_QtPKGi-60htlwOMHZ9e2BTyznTfNEi9aWZratLtrPHk1CpoKsG1wbn3rsWwUnmgNVdA6BPE4__r49Hhaw7spa-hpSyfXp-hIy9rD2c8eoufp5CmfRfP727v8Zh5VLBNtpJKEywqAMVACUsFFQrVUsVS8HKXARay5YAkNmpKE8RhGtGKQVUxDqWIdD9HFnrtxdtuBb4uV7VwTXhYsDfCMZiwLLrp3Vc5670AXG2fW0u0KSoq-2eJPsyFzuc94uYRf6v-Bb15peUw</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Alva, Maria L.</creator><creator>Mammo, Natnaell</creator><creator>Moore, Ryan T.</creator><creator>Quinney, Samuel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-2730</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Do Shallow Rental Subsidies Promote Housing Stability? Evidence on Costs and Effects from DC’s Flexible Program</title><author>Alva, Maria L. ; Mammo, Natnaell ; Moore, Ryan T. ; Quinney, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d445acee22ed7e875741fad3ad5b68e573f5724168e104253e61c2e9c2febd3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alternative approaches</topic><topic>Applicants</topic><topic>Direct payments</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>First year</topic><topic>Homeless people</topic><topic>Homelessness</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing costs</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tenants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alva, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammo, Natnaell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinney, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alva, Maria L.</au><au>Mammo, Natnaell</au><au>Moore, Ryan T.</au><au>Quinney, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Shallow Rental Subsidies Promote Housing Stability? Evidence on Costs and Effects from DC’s Flexible Program</atitle><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urban Affairs Review</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1530</spage><epage>1566</epage><pages>1530-1566</pages><issn>1078-0874</issn><eissn>1552-8332</eissn><abstract>Residents of cities face housing instability due to high housing costs. We conduct a randomized experiment evaluating the impacts of a flexible “shallow subsidy” among 668 qualified renters with recent housing instability. This local subsidy provides $7,200 a year directly to families earning less than 30 percent of the median family income, who choose how much assistance to use each month. Using administrative data, we track outcomes for the first year of program administration. After one year, the program has no statistically significant effect on homelessness, cash benefit receipt, or emergency rental assistance utilization, demonstrating no harm when compared to alternatives. However, the program leads to a 29 percentage point decrease in participants’ use of other types of local government housing services, which they must weigh against the shallow subsidy. We show that the program can be administratively cost-saving, but is not always beneficial for a very low-income subset of applicants.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10780874221111140</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-2730</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0874
ispartof Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023-09, Vol.59 (5), p.1530-1566
issn 1078-0874
1552-8332
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2844591929
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Alternative approaches
Applicants
Direct payments
Families & family life
First year
Homeless people
Homelessness
Housing
Housing costs
Income
Local government
Low income groups
Public administration
Residents
Stability
Stability analysis
Statistical analysis
Subsidies
Tenants
title Do Shallow Rental Subsidies Promote Housing Stability? Evidence on Costs and Effects from DC’s Flexible Program
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Shallow%20Rental%20Subsidies%20Promote%20Housing%20Stability?%20Evidence%20on%20Costs%20and%20Effects%20from%20DC%E2%80%99s%20Flexible%20Program&rft.jtitle=Urban%20affairs%20review%20(Thousand%20Oaks,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Alva,%20Maria%20L.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1530&rft.epage=1566&rft.pages=1530-1566&rft.issn=1078-0874&rft.eissn=1552-8332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10780874221111140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844591929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d445acee22ed7e875741fad3ad5b68e573f5724168e104253e61c2e9c2febd3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844591929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10780874221111140&rfr_iscdi=true