Loading…
The Legitimacy of Science
The ongoing pandemic and quickening climate crisis make it difficult to overstate the significance of science and science policy to our world. These global catastrophes have laid bare the fragility of science's legitimacy and its dependence on broader cultural understandings and institutional n...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annual review of sociology 2023-07, Vol.49 (1), p.263-279 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3 |
container_end_page | 279 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | Annual review of sociology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Gauchat, Gordon W |
description | The ongoing pandemic and quickening climate crisis make it difficult to overstate the significance of science and science policy to our world. These global catastrophes have laid bare the fragility of science's legitimacy and its dependence on broader cultural understandings and institutional norms. Challenges to science's legitimacy are numerous and daunting in the early twenty-first century but also nothing new. This review interrogates science as culture in our highly fragmented and polarized social environment, and the idea that scientific knowledge and expertise are experiencing a profound and accelerating legitimacy crisis. The challenges are internal and external to the production of scientific knowledge, emphasizing the publicly financed sector in colleges and universities worldwide. Internal threats include fraud, replicability, knowledge diffusion and equability, disciplinary fragmentation, and overproduction. Equally important are the external threats, such as polarization, authoritarianism, religious beliefs, information technology, and economic capital-commanding financial flows to organized science. While sociology is uniquely situated to study these composite issues, it faces sobering challenges and its own scientific legitimacy crisis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2845707725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2845707725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LxDAQhoMoWFd_gLeK5-pM0iTtRZDFLyh4cD2HNJ1ql7Vdk1bZf2-W7h_wNId53neGh7ErhBvEXN3avp88_WRhcBkIEBzikCD0EUtQ5jLjiPKYJSBU3EjNT9lZCGsAQAk8YZerT0or-ujG7su6XTq06ZvrqHd0zk5auwl0cZgL9v74sFo-Z9Xr08vyvsqsKOWYtcSbuq2FcrXSQgltNYAGXRAWjbS8to1tOZCywgluUUGJqDhgWdeKyIkFu557t374niiMZj1Mvo8nDS9yGas0l5EqZ8r5IQRPrdn6-LHfGQSzN2EOJkw0YWYTZjYRs3dzdo_YTYQ6-g3_KPgD3aRn6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2845707725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Legitimacy of Science</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Annual Reviews</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Gauchat, Gordon W</creator><creatorcontrib>Gauchat, Gordon W</creatorcontrib><description>The ongoing pandemic and quickening climate crisis make it difficult to overstate the significance of science and science policy to our world. These global catastrophes have laid bare the fragility of science's legitimacy and its dependence on broader cultural understandings and institutional norms. Challenges to science's legitimacy are numerous and daunting in the early twenty-first century but also nothing new. This review interrogates science as culture in our highly fragmented and polarized social environment, and the idea that scientific knowledge and expertise are experiencing a profound and accelerating legitimacy crisis. The challenges are internal and external to the production of scientific knowledge, emphasizing the publicly financed sector in colleges and universities worldwide. Internal threats include fraud, replicability, knowledge diffusion and equability, disciplinary fragmentation, and overproduction. Equally important are the external threats, such as polarization, authoritarianism, religious beliefs, information technology, and economic capital-commanding financial flows to organized science. While sociology is uniquely situated to study these composite issues, it faces sobering challenges and its own scientific legitimacy crisis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-2115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Capital ; Crises ; culture ; Disasters ; Fraud ; Information dissemination ; Information technology ; knowledge ; Legitimacy ; Pandemics ; Polarization ; public policy ; Religious beliefs ; Science ; Science and technology ; Science policy ; Scientific knowledge ; Segmentation ; Social environment ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Annual review of sociology, 2023-07, Vol.49 (1), p.263-279</ispartof><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,776,780,4168,27901,27902,33200,33751,78223,78224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gauchat, Gordon W</creatorcontrib><title>The Legitimacy of Science</title><title>Annual review of sociology</title><description>The ongoing pandemic and quickening climate crisis make it difficult to overstate the significance of science and science policy to our world. These global catastrophes have laid bare the fragility of science's legitimacy and its dependence on broader cultural understandings and institutional norms. Challenges to science's legitimacy are numerous and daunting in the early twenty-first century but also nothing new. This review interrogates science as culture in our highly fragmented and polarized social environment, and the idea that scientific knowledge and expertise are experiencing a profound and accelerating legitimacy crisis. The challenges are internal and external to the production of scientific knowledge, emphasizing the publicly financed sector in colleges and universities worldwide. Internal threats include fraud, replicability, knowledge diffusion and equability, disciplinary fragmentation, and overproduction. Equally important are the external threats, such as polarization, authoritarianism, religious beliefs, information technology, and economic capital-commanding financial flows to organized science. While sociology is uniquely situated to study these composite issues, it faces sobering challenges and its own scientific legitimacy crisis.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>culture</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>knowledge</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>public policy</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Science policy</subject><subject>Scientific knowledge</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Social environment</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0360-0572</issn><issn>1545-2115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ZYWBE</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LxDAQhoMoWFd_gLeK5-pM0iTtRZDFLyh4cD2HNJ1ql7Vdk1bZf2-W7h_wNId53neGh7ErhBvEXN3avp88_WRhcBkIEBzikCD0EUtQ5jLjiPKYJSBU3EjNT9lZCGsAQAk8YZerT0or-ujG7su6XTq06ZvrqHd0zk5auwl0cZgL9v74sFo-Z9Xr08vyvsqsKOWYtcSbuq2FcrXSQgltNYAGXRAWjbS8to1tOZCywgluUUGJqDhgWdeKyIkFu557t374niiMZj1Mvo8nDS9yGas0l5EqZ8r5IQRPrdn6-LHfGQSzN2EOJkw0YWYTZjYRs3dzdo_YTYQ6-g3_KPgD3aRn6g</recordid><startdate>20230731</startdate><enddate>20230731</enddate><creator>Gauchat, Gordon W</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>ZYWBE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230731</creationdate><title>The Legitimacy of Science</title><author>Gauchat, Gordon W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>culture</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>public policy</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Science policy</topic><topic>Scientific knowledge</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Social environment</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gauchat, Gordon W</creatorcontrib><collection>Annual Reviews Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gauchat, Gordon W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Legitimacy of Science</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of sociology</jtitle><date>2023-07-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>263-279</pages><issn>0360-0572</issn><eissn>1545-2115</eissn><abstract>The ongoing pandemic and quickening climate crisis make it difficult to overstate the significance of science and science policy to our world. These global catastrophes have laid bare the fragility of science's legitimacy and its dependence on broader cultural understandings and institutional norms. Challenges to science's legitimacy are numerous and daunting in the early twenty-first century but also nothing new. This review interrogates science as culture in our highly fragmented and polarized social environment, and the idea that scientific knowledge and expertise are experiencing a profound and accelerating legitimacy crisis. The challenges are internal and external to the production of scientific knowledge, emphasizing the publicly financed sector in colleges and universities worldwide. Internal threats include fraud, replicability, knowledge diffusion and equability, disciplinary fragmentation, and overproduction. Equally important are the external threats, such as polarization, authoritarianism, religious beliefs, information technology, and economic capital-commanding financial flows to organized science. While sociology is uniquely situated to study these composite issues, it faces sobering challenges and its own scientific legitimacy crisis.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-0572 |
ispartof | Annual review of sociology, 2023-07, Vol.49 (1), p.263-279 |
issn | 0360-0572 1545-2115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2845707725 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Annual Reviews; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Authoritarianism Capital Crises culture Disasters Fraud Information dissemination Information technology knowledge Legitimacy Pandemics Polarization public policy Religious beliefs Science Science and technology Science policy Scientific knowledge Segmentation Social environment Threats |
title | The Legitimacy of Science |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T07%3A20%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Legitimacy%20of%20Science&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Gauchat,%20Gordon%20W&rft.date=2023-07-31&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=263-279&rft.issn=0360-0572&rft.eissn=1545-2115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2845707725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-fe2dbfb36cb673637a7007078e18d5a2badaf20e6a3c32a16091162019bb6eec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2845707725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |