Loading…
How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis?
Background: Despite the well-accepted success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elective treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis, the efficacy and timing of this technique has been subject to some debate in the setting of acute cholecystitis. This study was undertaken to evaluate our institution’s...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2002-03, Vol.183 (3), p.232-236 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Despite the well-accepted success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elective treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis, the efficacy and timing of this technique has been subject to some debate in the setting of acute cholecystitis. This study was undertaken to evaluate our institution’s experience with early cholecystectomy as a safe, effective treatment of acute cholecystitis.
Methods: Charts of all patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the length of time from onset of symptoms to surgical intervention: less than 48 hours in the early group (n = 14) and more than 48 hours in the late group (n = 31).
Results: Comparing the two groups, the conversion rate to an open procedure was significantly less (0 versus 29%,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00789-4 |