Loading…
Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders
The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a self-reporting instrument to assess mental health. The present study was aimed to explore the optimal factor model of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 in patients with psychological disorders, and examine its measurement invariance across gende...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2023-07, Vol.42 (21), p.18133-18141 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403 |
container_end_page | 18141 |
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 18133 |
container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Liu, Zhaoxia Xi, Chang Zhong, Mingtian Peng, Wanrong Liu, Qian Chu, Jun Zheng, Kaili Yi, Jinyao |
description | The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a self-reporting instrument to assess mental health. The present study was aimed to explore the optimal factor model of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 in patients with psychological disorders, and examine its measurement invariance across gender. A total of 870 outpatients completed the GHQ-12. Among them, 361 patients also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was adopted to assess the fit of two models of the GHQ-12. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was performed to verify the measurement invariance of the GHQ-12 across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients, McDonald’s omega coefficients (ω), and mean inter-item correlations (M
IC
) were calculated to investigate the internal reliability of the GHQ-12. Pearson correlations between GHQ-12 and CES-D/SAS were performed to examine the convergent construct validity. The results showed that the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 fitted the data better than the 2-factor model, and the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 was measurement invariant across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients of the GHQ-12 and its factors ranged from 0.63 to 0.83, ω ranged from 0.80 to 0.90, and M
IC
ranged from 0.28 to 0.46. The scores of the GHQ-12 and its factors had significantly positive correlations with scores of CES-D and SAS. In conclusion, the good factorial validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 supported its application in evaluating the general mental health of patients in clinical context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-022-02845-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2847566640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A760145336</galeid><sourcerecordid>A760145336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1LHDEUhodioWr7B3oVKAhexOZrMjOXItoKgtCP63A2H7OR2WRNstr9942OoAuLhENCzvOehHPepvlKyRklpPueKaNCYMJYjV60mH5oDunAJRYd5wf1TITElFPyqTnK-Y4Q2slhOGzGK9AlJg8TeoDJG1-2KDpUlhZRhn2xKzTaYFPNLy1MZYnuNzYXH0MAnyzyAa2heBtKRo--ptd5q5dxiqPXVWN8jsnYlD83Hx1M2X552Y-bv1eXfy5-4pvbH9cX5zdYi34oWLdCGFgQ2rqFc4ZBPyw6DaR3XctqAMi2ZUTLzoDumVkQ4QzwARw4ZgXhx823ue46xeefqru4SaE-qWpfulZK-ZYaYbLKBxdLAr3yWavzThIqWs5lpfAe6qUdMVjn6_UOf7aHr8vYldd7Bac7gsoU-6-MsMlZXf_-tcuevGHnWeQ4bZ5GkXdBNoM6xZyTdWqd_ArSVlGinsyiZrOoahb1bBZFq4jPolzhMNr02rZ3VP8Bj0bAVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847566640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Liu, Zhaoxia ; Xi, Chang ; Zhong, Mingtian ; Peng, Wanrong ; Liu, Qian ; Chu, Jun ; Zheng, Kaili ; Yi, Jinyao</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaoxia ; Xi, Chang ; Zhong, Mingtian ; Peng, Wanrong ; Liu, Qian ; Chu, Jun ; Zheng, Kaili ; Yi, Jinyao</creatorcontrib><description>The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a self-reporting instrument to assess mental health. The present study was aimed to explore the optimal factor model of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 in patients with psychological disorders, and examine its measurement invariance across gender. A total of 870 outpatients completed the GHQ-12. Among them, 361 patients also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was adopted to assess the fit of two models of the GHQ-12. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was performed to verify the measurement invariance of the GHQ-12 across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients, McDonald’s omega coefficients (ω), and mean inter-item correlations (M
IC
) were calculated to investigate the internal reliability of the GHQ-12. Pearson correlations between GHQ-12 and CES-D/SAS were performed to examine the convergent construct validity. The results showed that the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 fitted the data better than the 2-factor model, and the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 was measurement invariant across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients of the GHQ-12 and its factors ranged from 0.63 to 0.83, ω ranged from 0.80 to 0.90, and M
IC
ranged from 0.28 to 0.46. The scores of the GHQ-12 and its factors had significantly positive correlations with scores of CES-D and SAS. In conclusion, the good factorial validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 supported its application in evaluating the general mental health of patients in clinical context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-02845-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Gender ; Mental health ; Mental illness ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Social Sciences ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023-07, Vol.42 (21), p.18133-18141</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Mingtian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Wanrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Kaili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Jinyao</creatorcontrib><title>Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a self-reporting instrument to assess mental health. The present study was aimed to explore the optimal factor model of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 in patients with psychological disorders, and examine its measurement invariance across gender. A total of 870 outpatients completed the GHQ-12. Among them, 361 patients also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was adopted to assess the fit of two models of the GHQ-12. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was performed to verify the measurement invariance of the GHQ-12 across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients, McDonald’s omega coefficients (ω), and mean inter-item correlations (M
IC
) were calculated to investigate the internal reliability of the GHQ-12. Pearson correlations between GHQ-12 and CES-D/SAS were performed to examine the convergent construct validity. The results showed that the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 fitted the data better than the 2-factor model, and the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 was measurement invariant across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients of the GHQ-12 and its factors ranged from 0.63 to 0.83, ω ranged from 0.80 to 0.90, and M
IC
ranged from 0.28 to 0.46. The scores of the GHQ-12 and its factors had significantly positive correlations with scores of CES-D and SAS. In conclusion, the good factorial validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 supported its application in evaluating the general mental health of patients in clinical context.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kl1LHDEUhodioWr7B3oVKAhexOZrMjOXItoKgtCP63A2H7OR2WRNstr9942OoAuLhENCzvOehHPepvlKyRklpPueKaNCYMJYjV60mH5oDunAJRYd5wf1TITElFPyqTnK-Y4Q2slhOGzGK9AlJg8TeoDJG1-2KDpUlhZRhn2xKzTaYFPNLy1MZYnuNzYXH0MAnyzyAa2heBtKRo--ptd5q5dxiqPXVWN8jsnYlD83Hx1M2X552Y-bv1eXfy5-4pvbH9cX5zdYi34oWLdCGFgQ2rqFc4ZBPyw6DaR3XctqAMi2ZUTLzoDumVkQ4QzwARw4ZgXhx823ue46xeefqru4SaE-qWpfulZK-ZYaYbLKBxdLAr3yWavzThIqWs5lpfAe6qUdMVjn6_UOf7aHr8vYldd7Bac7gsoU-6-MsMlZXf_-tcuevGHnWeQ4bZ5GkXdBNoM6xZyTdWqd_ArSVlGinsyiZrOoahb1bBZFq4jPolzhMNr02rZ3VP8Bj0bAVg</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Liu, Zhaoxia</creator><creator>Xi, Chang</creator><creator>Zhong, Mingtian</creator><creator>Peng, Wanrong</creator><creator>Liu, Qian</creator><creator>Chu, Jun</creator><creator>Zheng, Kaili</creator><creator>Yi, Jinyao</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders</title><author>Liu, Zhaoxia ; Xi, Chang ; Zhong, Mingtian ; Peng, Wanrong ; Liu, Qian ; Chu, Jun ; Zheng, Kaili ; Yi, Jinyao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Mingtian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Wanrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Kaili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Jinyao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science in Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zhaoxia</au><au>Xi, Chang</au><au>Zhong, Mingtian</au><au>Peng, Wanrong</au><au>Liu, Qian</au><au>Chu, Jun</au><au>Zheng, Kaili</au><au>Yi, Jinyao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>18133</spage><epage>18141</epage><pages>18133-18141</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a self-reporting instrument to assess mental health. The present study was aimed to explore the optimal factor model of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 in patients with psychological disorders, and examine its measurement invariance across gender. A total of 870 outpatients completed the GHQ-12. Among them, 361 patients also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was adopted to assess the fit of two models of the GHQ-12. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was performed to verify the measurement invariance of the GHQ-12 across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients, McDonald’s omega coefficients (ω), and mean inter-item correlations (M
IC
) were calculated to investigate the internal reliability of the GHQ-12. Pearson correlations between GHQ-12 and CES-D/SAS were performed to examine the convergent construct validity. The results showed that the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 fitted the data better than the 2-factor model, and the 3-factor model of the GHQ-12 was measurement invariant across gender. The Cronbach’s
α
coefficients of the GHQ-12 and its factors ranged from 0.63 to 0.83, ω ranged from 0.80 to 0.90, and M
IC
ranged from 0.28 to 0.46. The scores of the GHQ-12 and its factors had significantly positive correlations with scores of CES-D and SAS. In conclusion, the good factorial validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the GHQ-12 supported its application in evaluating the general mental health of patients in clinical context.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-022-02845-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023-07, Vol.42 (21), p.18133-18141 |
issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2847566640 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Diagnosis Evaluation Gender Mental health Mental illness Psychological tests Psychology Questionnaires Social Sciences Validity |
title | Factorial validity of the 12-item general health questionnaire in patients with psychological disorders |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factorial%20validity%20of%20the%2012-item%20general%20health%20questionnaire%20in%20patients%20with%20psychological%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Liu,%20Zhaoxia&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=18133&rft.epage=18141&rft.pages=18133-18141&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-022-02845-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA760145336%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c544dab015fbffd2a89b7ca08f752f75aa65520c67dac82db04fda39afaf2e403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847566640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A760145336&rfr_iscdi=true |