Loading…
FPGA Processor In Memory Architectures (PIMs): Overlay or Overhaul ?
The dominance of machine learning and the ending of Moore's law have renewed interests in Processor in Memory (PIM) architectures. This interest has produced several recent proposals to modify an FPGA's BRAM architecture to form a next-generation PIM reconfigurable fabric. PIM architecture...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2023-08 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | MD Arafat Kabir Kabir, Ehsan Hollis, Joshua Levy-Mackay, Eli Panahi, Atiyehsadat Bakos, Jason Huang, Miaoqing Andrews, David |
description | The dominance of machine learning and the ending of Moore's law have renewed interests in Processor in Memory (PIM) architectures. This interest has produced several recent proposals to modify an FPGA's BRAM architecture to form a next-generation PIM reconfigurable fabric. PIM architectures can also be realized within today's FPGAs as overlays without the need to modify the underlying FPGA architecture. To date, there has been no study to understand the comparative advantages of the two approaches. In this paper, we present a study that explores the comparative advantages between two proposed custom architectures and a PIM overlay running on a commodity FPGA. We created PiCaSO, a Processor in/near Memory Scalable and Fast Overlay architecture as a representative PIM overlay. The results of this study show that the PiCaSO overlay achieves up to 80% of the peak throughput of the custom designs with 2.56x shorter latency and 25% - 43% better BRAM memory utilization efficiency. We then show how several key features of the PiCaSO overlay can be integrated into the custom PIM designs to further improve their throughput by 18%, latency by 19.5%, and memory efficiency by 6.2%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2308.03914 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2847999916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847999916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a954-7a96f62a440e3609cfaece4100f598bd2fb177bc8b62b256931115eb3878ab9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjU9PwjAchhsTEwjyAbg18aKHzfbX_17MgoJLIOzAnbSlC5DJtN2IfHtn9L28z-HN8yI0oyTnWgjyZOP38ZIDIzonzFB-g8bAGM00BxihaUonQghIBUKwMXpdVMsCV7H1IaU24vKM1-GjjVdcRH84dsF3fQwJP1TlOj0-480lxMZe8TD9xYPtG_xyh25r26Qw_e8J2i7etvP3bLVZlvNilVkjeKaskbUEyzkJTBLjaxt84JSQWhjt9lA7qpTz2klwIKRhlFIRHNNKW2f2bILu_7Sfsf3qQ-p2p7aP5-FxB5orM4RK9gOQHUpr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847999916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FPGA Processor In Memory Architectures (PIMs): Overlay or Overhaul ?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>MD Arafat Kabir ; Kabir, Ehsan ; Hollis, Joshua ; Levy-Mackay, Eli ; Panahi, Atiyehsadat ; Bakos, Jason ; Huang, Miaoqing ; Andrews, David</creator><creatorcontrib>MD Arafat Kabir ; Kabir, Ehsan ; Hollis, Joshua ; Levy-Mackay, Eli ; Panahi, Atiyehsadat ; Bakos, Jason ; Huang, Miaoqing ; Andrews, David</creatorcontrib><description>The dominance of machine learning and the ending of Moore's law have renewed interests in Processor in Memory (PIM) architectures. This interest has produced several recent proposals to modify an FPGA's BRAM architecture to form a next-generation PIM reconfigurable fabric. PIM architectures can also be realized within today's FPGAs as overlays without the need to modify the underlying FPGA architecture. To date, there has been no study to understand the comparative advantages of the two approaches. In this paper, we present a study that explores the comparative advantages between two proposed custom architectures and a PIM overlay running on a commodity FPGA. We created PiCaSO, a Processor in/near Memory Scalable and Fast Overlay architecture as a representative PIM overlay. The results of this study show that the PiCaSO overlay achieves up to 80% of the peak throughput of the custom designs with 2.56x shorter latency and 25% - 43% better BRAM memory utilization efficiency. We then show how several key features of the PiCaSO overlay can be integrated into the custom PIM designs to further improve their throughput by 18%, latency by 19.5%, and memory efficiency by 6.2%.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2308.03914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computer architecture ; Machine learning ; Microprocessors ; Moore's law</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-08</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2847999916?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25752,27924,37011,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MD Arafat Kabir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy-Mackay, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panahi, Atiyehsadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakos, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Miaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, David</creatorcontrib><title>FPGA Processor In Memory Architectures (PIMs): Overlay or Overhaul ?</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The dominance of machine learning and the ending of Moore's law have renewed interests in Processor in Memory (PIM) architectures. This interest has produced several recent proposals to modify an FPGA's BRAM architecture to form a next-generation PIM reconfigurable fabric. PIM architectures can also be realized within today's FPGAs as overlays without the need to modify the underlying FPGA architecture. To date, there has been no study to understand the comparative advantages of the two approaches. In this paper, we present a study that explores the comparative advantages between two proposed custom architectures and a PIM overlay running on a commodity FPGA. We created PiCaSO, a Processor in/near Memory Scalable and Fast Overlay architecture as a representative PIM overlay. The results of this study show that the PiCaSO overlay achieves up to 80% of the peak throughput of the custom designs with 2.56x shorter latency and 25% - 43% better BRAM memory utilization efficiency. We then show how several key features of the PiCaSO overlay can be integrated into the custom PIM designs to further improve their throughput by 18%, latency by 19.5%, and memory efficiency by 6.2%.</description><subject>Computer architecture</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Microprocessors</subject><subject>Moore's law</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotjU9PwjAchhsTEwjyAbg18aKHzfbX_17MgoJLIOzAnbSlC5DJtN2IfHtn9L28z-HN8yI0oyTnWgjyZOP38ZIDIzonzFB-g8bAGM00BxihaUonQghIBUKwMXpdVMsCV7H1IaU24vKM1-GjjVdcRH84dsF3fQwJP1TlOj0-480lxMZe8TD9xYPtG_xyh25r26Qw_e8J2i7etvP3bLVZlvNilVkjeKaskbUEyzkJTBLjaxt84JSQWhjt9lA7qpTz2klwIKRhlFIRHNNKW2f2bILu_7Sfsf3qQ-p2p7aP5-FxB5orM4RK9gOQHUpr</recordid><startdate>20230807</startdate><enddate>20230807</enddate><creator>MD Arafat Kabir</creator><creator>Kabir, Ehsan</creator><creator>Hollis, Joshua</creator><creator>Levy-Mackay, Eli</creator><creator>Panahi, Atiyehsadat</creator><creator>Bakos, Jason</creator><creator>Huang, Miaoqing</creator><creator>Andrews, David</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230807</creationdate><title>FPGA Processor In Memory Architectures (PIMs): Overlay or Overhaul ?</title><author>MD Arafat Kabir ; Kabir, Ehsan ; Hollis, Joshua ; Levy-Mackay, Eli ; Panahi, Atiyehsadat ; Bakos, Jason ; Huang, Miaoqing ; Andrews, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a954-7a96f62a440e3609cfaece4100f598bd2fb177bc8b62b256931115eb3878ab9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer architecture</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Microprocessors</topic><topic>Moore's law</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MD Arafat Kabir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy-Mackay, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panahi, Atiyehsadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakos, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Miaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MD Arafat Kabir</au><au>Kabir, Ehsan</au><au>Hollis, Joshua</au><au>Levy-Mackay, Eli</au><au>Panahi, Atiyehsadat</au><au>Bakos, Jason</au><au>Huang, Miaoqing</au><au>Andrews, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FPGA Processor In Memory Architectures (PIMs): Overlay or Overhaul ?</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-08-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The dominance of machine learning and the ending of Moore's law have renewed interests in Processor in Memory (PIM) architectures. This interest has produced several recent proposals to modify an FPGA's BRAM architecture to form a next-generation PIM reconfigurable fabric. PIM architectures can also be realized within today's FPGAs as overlays without the need to modify the underlying FPGA architecture. To date, there has been no study to understand the comparative advantages of the two approaches. In this paper, we present a study that explores the comparative advantages between two proposed custom architectures and a PIM overlay running on a commodity FPGA. We created PiCaSO, a Processor in/near Memory Scalable and Fast Overlay architecture as a representative PIM overlay. The results of this study show that the PiCaSO overlay achieves up to 80% of the peak throughput of the custom designs with 2.56x shorter latency and 25% - 43% better BRAM memory utilization efficiency. We then show how several key features of the PiCaSO overlay can be integrated into the custom PIM designs to further improve their throughput by 18%, latency by 19.5%, and memory efficiency by 6.2%.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2308.03914</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-08 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2847999916 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Computer architecture Machine learning Microprocessors Moore's law |
title | FPGA Processor In Memory Architectures (PIMs): Overlay or Overhaul ? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FPGA%20Processor%20In%20Memory%20Architectures%20(PIMs):%20Overlay%20or%20Overhaul%20?&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=MD%20Arafat%20Kabir&rft.date=2023-08-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2308.03914&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2847999916%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a954-7a96f62a440e3609cfaece4100f598bd2fb177bc8b62b256931115eb3878ab9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847999916&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |