Loading…

Predictors of seropositivity against SARS-COV-2: a population-based seroepidemiological study

Background Data on parameters of actual exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is limited, and specific population groups might be at a higher risk of infection. In line with the growing need for large-scale investigations to determine the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among different population groups,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of public health 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)
Main Authors: Musheghyan, L, Sahakyan, S, Sargsyan, Z, Muradyan, D, Aslanyan, L, Gharibyan, N, Harutyunyan, A, Khachadourian, V, Petrosyan, V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 32
creator Musheghyan, L
Sahakyan, S
Sargsyan, Z
Muradyan, D
Aslanyan, L
Gharibyan, N
Harutyunyan, A
Khachadourian, V
Petrosyan, V
description Background Data on parameters of actual exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is limited, and specific population groups might be at a higher risk of infection. In line with the growing need for large-scale investigations to determine the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among different population groups, we conducted a nationwide assessment in Armenia. Methods We performed a cross-sectional seroepidemiological study among the adult population in Armenia, in May-September 2021. A multi-stage cluster random sampling was performed to recruit the participants across the capital city and regions. The study had two main components: blood sampling, which took place in primary care facilities and a phone survey on socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and previous history of COVID-19. Results The number of participants included in both blood sampling and phone survey was 3483. The nationwide prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies weighted by age and gender was 66.4% with significantly higher prevalence in urban compared to rural areas (67.3% vs 59.3%, p < 0.001). Only 22.7% (n = 772) of the total sample reported a previous history of PCR confirmed COVID-19, among whom antibodies were detected in 94.2% (n = 727). In the final adjusted model, the seropositivity was associated with being female (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.32; 1.92), employed (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17; 1.69), and having previous PCR confirmed COVID-19 (OR = 10.6, 95% CI: 7.39; 15.21). Conclusions Over 66% of the population were seropositive for antibodies against SARS-CoV 2; and over ⅕ of the sample reported a previous PCR diagnosis. Factors associated with increased odds of seropositivity included gender, employment status, and place of residence. Targeted interventions are recommended to minimize the risk of infection among those groups, including vaccination and infection prevention and control measures. Key messages • The prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies is about three times higher than the rate of infection based on PCR confirmed prevalence of COVID-19. • Women, people living in urban areas, and those employed are at a higher risk for exposure to SARS-CoV 2.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.049
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2854901155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.049</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2854901155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1539-52145b126e7a85977b8da5d948c0379e3d67294f6ab33d76c511fffe27c9e9113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4GrAddrcZDKZuCvFPxAqVsWNhEySKanTZkxmhL69o-0DuLp38Z3vXg5Cl0AmQCSbuj62fTU1n9oAlROSyyM0grzIMSvI-_GwAwEMtKCn6CylNSGEi5KO0MdTdNabLsSUhTpLLoY2JN_5b9_tMr3Sfpu6bDl7XuL54g3T60xnbWj7Rnc-bHGlk7N_lGu9dRsfmrDyRjdZ6nq7O0cntW6SuzjMMXq9vXmZ3-PHxd3DfPaIDXAmMaeQ82r4zgldcilEVVrNrcxLQ5iQjtlCUJnXha4Ys6IwHKCua0eFkU4CsDG62ve2MXz1LnVqHfq4HU4qWvJcEgDOhxTdp0wMKUVXqzb6jY47BUT9alR7jeqgUQ0aBwjvodC3_8n_AEY0eCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854901155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of seropositivity against SARS-COV-2: a population-based seroepidemiological study</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Musheghyan, L ; Sahakyan, S ; Sargsyan, Z ; Muradyan, D ; Aslanyan, L ; Gharibyan, N ; Harutyunyan, A ; Khachadourian, V ; Petrosyan, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Musheghyan, L ; Sahakyan, S ; Sargsyan, Z ; Muradyan, D ; Aslanyan, L ; Gharibyan, N ; Harutyunyan, A ; Khachadourian, V ; Petrosyan, V</creatorcontrib><description>Background Data on parameters of actual exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is limited, and specific population groups might be at a higher risk of infection. In line with the growing need for large-scale investigations to determine the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among different population groups, we conducted a nationwide assessment in Armenia. Methods We performed a cross-sectional seroepidemiological study among the adult population in Armenia, in May-September 2021. A multi-stage cluster random sampling was performed to recruit the participants across the capital city and regions. The study had two main components: blood sampling, which took place in primary care facilities and a phone survey on socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and previous history of COVID-19. Results The number of participants included in both blood sampling and phone survey was 3483. The nationwide prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies weighted by age and gender was 66.4% with significantly higher prevalence in urban compared to rural areas (67.3% vs 59.3%, p &lt; 0.001). Only 22.7% (n = 772) of the total sample reported a previous history of PCR confirmed COVID-19, among whom antibodies were detected in 94.2% (n = 727). In the final adjusted model, the seropositivity was associated with being female (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.32; 1.92), employed (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17; 1.69), and having previous PCR confirmed COVID-19 (OR = 10.6, 95% CI: 7.39; 15.21). Conclusions Over 66% of the population were seropositive for antibodies against SARS-CoV 2; and over ⅕ of the sample reported a previous PCR diagnosis. Factors associated with increased odds of seropositivity included gender, employment status, and place of residence. Targeted interventions are recommended to minimize the risk of infection among those groups, including vaccination and infection prevention and control measures. Key messages • The prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies is about three times higher than the rate of infection based on PCR confirmed prevalence of COVID-19. • Women, people living in urban areas, and those employed are at a higher risk for exposure to SARS-CoV 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Blood ; Comorbidity ; COVID-19 ; Employment ; Gender ; Health risks ; Immunization ; Infections ; Population ; Population studies ; Primary care ; Public health ; Random sampling ; Risk ; Risk reduction ; Rural areas ; Sampling ; Seroepidemiology ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Statistical sampling ; Surveys ; Urban areas ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1598,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Musheghyan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahakyan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargsyan, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muradyan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslanyan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharibyan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harutyunyan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khachadourian, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrosyan, V</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of seropositivity against SARS-COV-2: a population-based seroepidemiological study</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Background Data on parameters of actual exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is limited, and specific population groups might be at a higher risk of infection. In line with the growing need for large-scale investigations to determine the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among different population groups, we conducted a nationwide assessment in Armenia. Methods We performed a cross-sectional seroepidemiological study among the adult population in Armenia, in May-September 2021. A multi-stage cluster random sampling was performed to recruit the participants across the capital city and regions. The study had two main components: blood sampling, which took place in primary care facilities and a phone survey on socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and previous history of COVID-19. Results The number of participants included in both blood sampling and phone survey was 3483. The nationwide prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies weighted by age and gender was 66.4% with significantly higher prevalence in urban compared to rural areas (67.3% vs 59.3%, p &lt; 0.001). Only 22.7% (n = 772) of the total sample reported a previous history of PCR confirmed COVID-19, among whom antibodies were detected in 94.2% (n = 727). In the final adjusted model, the seropositivity was associated with being female (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.32; 1.92), employed (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17; 1.69), and having previous PCR confirmed COVID-19 (OR = 10.6, 95% CI: 7.39; 15.21). Conclusions Over 66% of the population were seropositive for antibodies against SARS-CoV 2; and over ⅕ of the sample reported a previous PCR diagnosis. Factors associated with increased odds of seropositivity included gender, employment status, and place of residence. Targeted interventions are recommended to minimize the risk of infection among those groups, including vaccination and infection prevention and control measures. Key messages • The prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies is about three times higher than the rate of infection based on PCR confirmed prevalence of COVID-19. • Women, people living in urban areas, and those employed are at a higher risk for exposure to SARS-CoV 2.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Seroepidemiology</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Statistical sampling</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4GrAddrcZDKZuCvFPxAqVsWNhEySKanTZkxmhL69o-0DuLp38Z3vXg5Cl0AmQCSbuj62fTU1n9oAlROSyyM0grzIMSvI-_GwAwEMtKCn6CylNSGEi5KO0MdTdNabLsSUhTpLLoY2JN_5b9_tMr3Sfpu6bDl7XuL54g3T60xnbWj7Rnc-bHGlk7N_lGu9dRsfmrDyRjdZ6nq7O0cntW6SuzjMMXq9vXmZ3-PHxd3DfPaIDXAmMaeQ82r4zgldcilEVVrNrcxLQ5iQjtlCUJnXha4Ys6IwHKCua0eFkU4CsDG62ve2MXz1LnVqHfq4HU4qWvJcEgDOhxTdp0wMKUVXqzb6jY47BUT9alR7jeqgUQ0aBwjvodC3_8n_AEY0eCc</recordid><startdate>20221021</startdate><enddate>20221021</enddate><creator>Musheghyan, L</creator><creator>Sahakyan, S</creator><creator>Sargsyan, Z</creator><creator>Muradyan, D</creator><creator>Aslanyan, L</creator><creator>Gharibyan, N</creator><creator>Harutyunyan, A</creator><creator>Khachadourian, V</creator><creator>Petrosyan, V</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221021</creationdate><title>Predictors of seropositivity against SARS-COV-2: a population-based seroepidemiological study</title><author>Musheghyan, L ; Sahakyan, S ; Sargsyan, Z ; Muradyan, D ; Aslanyan, L ; Gharibyan, N ; Harutyunyan, A ; Khachadourian, V ; Petrosyan, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1539-52145b126e7a85977b8da5d948c0379e3d67294f6ab33d76c511fffe27c9e9113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Seroepidemiology</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Statistical sampling</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Musheghyan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahakyan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargsyan, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muradyan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslanyan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharibyan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harutyunyan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khachadourian, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrosyan, V</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Musheghyan, L</au><au>Sahakyan, S</au><au>Sargsyan, Z</au><au>Muradyan, D</au><au>Aslanyan, L</au><au>Gharibyan, N</au><au>Harutyunyan, A</au><au>Khachadourian, V</au><au>Petrosyan, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of seropositivity against SARS-COV-2: a population-based seroepidemiological study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2022-10-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Background Data on parameters of actual exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is limited, and specific population groups might be at a higher risk of infection. In line with the growing need for large-scale investigations to determine the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among different population groups, we conducted a nationwide assessment in Armenia. Methods We performed a cross-sectional seroepidemiological study among the adult population in Armenia, in May-September 2021. A multi-stage cluster random sampling was performed to recruit the participants across the capital city and regions. The study had two main components: blood sampling, which took place in primary care facilities and a phone survey on socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and previous history of COVID-19. Results The number of participants included in both blood sampling and phone survey was 3483. The nationwide prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies weighted by age and gender was 66.4% with significantly higher prevalence in urban compared to rural areas (67.3% vs 59.3%, p &lt; 0.001). Only 22.7% (n = 772) of the total sample reported a previous history of PCR confirmed COVID-19, among whom antibodies were detected in 94.2% (n = 727). In the final adjusted model, the seropositivity was associated with being female (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.32; 1.92), employed (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17; 1.69), and having previous PCR confirmed COVID-19 (OR = 10.6, 95% CI: 7.39; 15.21). Conclusions Over 66% of the population were seropositive for antibodies against SARS-CoV 2; and over ⅕ of the sample reported a previous PCR diagnosis. Factors associated with increased odds of seropositivity included gender, employment status, and place of residence. Targeted interventions are recommended to minimize the risk of infection among those groups, including vaccination and infection prevention and control measures. Key messages • The prevalence of SARS-CoV 2 antibodies is about three times higher than the rate of infection based on PCR confirmed prevalence of COVID-19. • Women, people living in urban areas, and those employed are at a higher risk for exposure to SARS-CoV 2.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.049</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2854901155
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); PAIS Index; Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)
subjects Antibodies
Blood
Comorbidity
COVID-19
Employment
Gender
Health risks
Immunization
Infections
Population
Population studies
Primary care
Public health
Random sampling
Risk
Risk reduction
Rural areas
Sampling
Seroepidemiology
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Statistical sampling
Surveys
Urban areas
Vaccination
title Predictors of seropositivity against SARS-COV-2: a population-based seroepidemiological study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A10%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20seropositivity%20against%20SARS-COV-2:%20a%20population-based%20seroepidemiological%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Musheghyan,%20L&rft.date=2022-10-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854901155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1539-52145b126e7a85977b8da5d948c0379e3d67294f6ab33d76c511fffe27c9e9113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854901155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.049&rfr_iscdi=true