Loading…
Multisectoral approach to address Female Genital Mutilation: a case study from Portugal
Issue Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that injury female genital organs for non-medical reasons, with several health impacts. Due to global migration, FGM has been increasingly recognised as a healthcare issue in Europe, affecting nearly 1 million women. In Portugal it is es...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of public health 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | Supplement_3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Vareda, R Valente, J Alho, AM Carmona, A Chaves, D Silva, L Ribeiro, S Paixão, M Leite, A |
description | Issue
Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that injury female genital organs for non-medical reasons, with several health impacts. Due to global migration, FGM has been increasingly recognised as a healthcare issue in Europe, affecting nearly 1 million women. In Portugal it is estimated that 5483 migrant women have undergone FGM in the Lisbon region. Intervention is required to tackle this issue.
Description
Portugal launched the "Healthy Practices: End of FGM", a multiagency project targeting Lisbon and Tagus Valley region. Project implementation started in Nov 2018 at 5 local public health units (PHU) and was scaled-up to 5 more in Feb 2020. Project comprises 3 main axes: 1) inclusion in public policy instruments; 2) professionals' education and awareness; and 3) community intervention. We describe inclusion of FGM in public policy, professionals training and changes in FGM recording before and after intervention.
Results
Between 2018-2022, inclusion of FGM in municipalities' migration policies doubled. Between 2019-2021, 110 training sessions (n = 1722 professionals) were promoted. During pandemic years, only 344 (2020) and 202 (2021) were trained. Raising awareness and empowerment to risk communities happened mainly through local/online open sessions, workshops, flyer distribution, video projections. These occurred in all 10 PHU, mostly through partnerships with Non-Governmental Organizations and municipalities. According to the Portuguese Health Records, until 2018 there were only 300 women registered with FGM. Between 2019-2021, 363 more were added.
Lessons
The multisectoral approach allowed PHU professionals to collaborate directly with external organizations from different society sectors. COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge to implementation, especially in the community intervention axis. Notification numbers increased after interventions, though causality could not be established and impact evaluation is yet to be performed.
Key messages
* Multisectoral projects for FGM intervention have specific implementation challenges, including how to justify and evaluate them, that must be considered in each setting.
* Training health professionals might increase identification and notification of FGM, but the impact in preventing FGM in the Portuguese reality is still largely unknown. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.460 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2854902434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.460</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2854902434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1530-2b1334622f2a9bf3f7db3b64be247185d66928d0234ccc82bb6005429133237e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU5rjx0nYYcqWpBawQIEO8t2HEhJ6-DHon-PUfkAVjOLc2euDkLXlMwoadjcJj8mPTdfylBGZ1yQEzShXPCCCfJ-mndKaEFBwDm6CGFLCCmrGibobZOG2AdrovNqwGocvVPmE0eHVdt6GwJe2p0aLF7ZfR8zskmxH1Ts3f4WK2xUsDjE1B5w590OPzsf04caLtFZp4Zgr_7mFL0u718WD8X6afW4uFsXhpaMFKApY1wAdKAa3bGuajXTgmsLvKJ12QrRQN0SYNwYU4PWIjfn0OQYsMqyKbo53s29v5MNUW5d8vv8UkJd8oYAZzxTcKSMdyF428nR9zvlD5IS-StQHgXKP4EyC8yh4hhyafwP_wOmEHUf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854902434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multisectoral approach to address Female Genital Mutilation: a case study from Portugal</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Vareda, R ; Valente, J ; Alho, AM ; Carmona, A ; Chaves, D ; Silva, L ; Ribeiro, S ; Paixão, M ; Leite, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Vareda, R ; Valente, J ; Alho, AM ; Carmona, A ; Chaves, D ; Silva, L ; Ribeiro, S ; Paixão, M ; Leite, A</creatorcontrib><description>Issue
Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that injury female genital organs for non-medical reasons, with several health impacts. Due to global migration, FGM has been increasingly recognised as a healthcare issue in Europe, affecting nearly 1 million women. In Portugal it is estimated that 5483 migrant women have undergone FGM in the Lisbon region. Intervention is required to tackle this issue.
Description
Portugal launched the "Healthy Practices: End of FGM", a multiagency project targeting Lisbon and Tagus Valley region. Project implementation started in Nov 2018 at 5 local public health units (PHU) and was scaled-up to 5 more in Feb 2020. Project comprises 3 main axes: 1) inclusion in public policy instruments; 2) professionals' education and awareness; and 3) community intervention. We describe inclusion of FGM in public policy, professionals training and changes in FGM recording before and after intervention.
Results
Between 2018-2022, inclusion of FGM in municipalities' migration policies doubled. Between 2019-2021, 110 training sessions (n = 1722 professionals) were promoted. During pandemic years, only 344 (2020) and 202 (2021) were trained. Raising awareness and empowerment to risk communities happened mainly through local/online open sessions, workshops, flyer distribution, video projections. These occurred in all 10 PHU, mostly through partnerships with Non-Governmental Organizations and municipalities. According to the Portuguese Health Records, until 2018 there were only 300 women registered with FGM. Between 2019-2021, 363 more were added.
Lessons
The multisectoral approach allowed PHU professionals to collaborate directly with external organizations from different society sectors. COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge to implementation, especially in the community intervention axis. Notification numbers increased after interventions, though causality could not be established and impact evaluation is yet to be performed.
Key messages
* Multisectoral projects for FGM intervention have specific implementation challenges, including how to justify and evaluate them, that must be considered in each setting.
* Training health professionals might increase identification and notification of FGM, but the impact in preventing FGM in the Portuguese reality is still largely unknown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Case studies ; COVID-19 ; Empowerment ; Female circumcision ; Females ; Genital mutilation ; Implementation ; Intervention ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Migration ; Municipalities ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Pandemics ; Professionals ; Public health ; Public policy ; Regions ; Training ; Women</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vareda, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valente, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alho, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paixão, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, A</creatorcontrib><title>Multisectoral approach to address Female Genital Mutilation: a case study from Portugal</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Issue
Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that injury female genital organs for non-medical reasons, with several health impacts. Due to global migration, FGM has been increasingly recognised as a healthcare issue in Europe, affecting nearly 1 million women. In Portugal it is estimated that 5483 migrant women have undergone FGM in the Lisbon region. Intervention is required to tackle this issue.
Description
Portugal launched the "Healthy Practices: End of FGM", a multiagency project targeting Lisbon and Tagus Valley region. Project implementation started in Nov 2018 at 5 local public health units (PHU) and was scaled-up to 5 more in Feb 2020. Project comprises 3 main axes: 1) inclusion in public policy instruments; 2) professionals' education and awareness; and 3) community intervention. We describe inclusion of FGM in public policy, professionals training and changes in FGM recording before and after intervention.
Results
Between 2018-2022, inclusion of FGM in municipalities' migration policies doubled. Between 2019-2021, 110 training sessions (n = 1722 professionals) were promoted. During pandemic years, only 344 (2020) and 202 (2021) were trained. Raising awareness and empowerment to risk communities happened mainly through local/online open sessions, workshops, flyer distribution, video projections. These occurred in all 10 PHU, mostly through partnerships with Non-Governmental Organizations and municipalities. According to the Portuguese Health Records, until 2018 there were only 300 women registered with FGM. Between 2019-2021, 363 more were added.
Lessons
The multisectoral approach allowed PHU professionals to collaborate directly with external organizations from different society sectors. COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge to implementation, especially in the community intervention axis. Notification numbers increased after interventions, though causality could not be established and impact evaluation is yet to be performed.
Key messages
* Multisectoral projects for FGM intervention have specific implementation challenges, including how to justify and evaluate them, that must be considered in each setting.
* Training health professionals might increase identification and notification of FGM, but the impact in preventing FGM in the Portuguese reality is still largely unknown.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Female circumcision</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Genital mutilation</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU5rjx0nYYcqWpBawQIEO8t2HEhJ6-DHon-PUfkAVjOLc2euDkLXlMwoadjcJj8mPTdfylBGZ1yQEzShXPCCCfJ-mndKaEFBwDm6CGFLCCmrGibobZOG2AdrovNqwGocvVPmE0eHVdt6GwJe2p0aLF7ZfR8zskmxH1Ts3f4WK2xUsDjE1B5w590OPzsf04caLtFZp4Zgr_7mFL0u718WD8X6afW4uFsXhpaMFKApY1wAdKAa3bGuajXTgmsLvKJ12QrRQN0SYNwYU4PWIjfn0OQYsMqyKbo53s29v5MNUW5d8vv8UkJd8oYAZzxTcKSMdyF428nR9zvlD5IS-StQHgXKP4EyC8yh4hhyafwP_wOmEHUf</recordid><startdate>20221021</startdate><enddate>20221021</enddate><creator>Vareda, R</creator><creator>Valente, J</creator><creator>Alho, AM</creator><creator>Carmona, A</creator><creator>Chaves, D</creator><creator>Silva, L</creator><creator>Ribeiro, S</creator><creator>Paixão, M</creator><creator>Leite, A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221021</creationdate><title>Multisectoral approach to address Female Genital Mutilation: a case study from Portugal</title><author>Vareda, R ; Valente, J ; Alho, AM ; Carmona, A ; Chaves, D ; Silva, L ; Ribeiro, S ; Paixão, M ; Leite, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1530-2b1334622f2a9bf3f7db3b64be247185d66928d0234ccc82bb6005429133237e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Female circumcision</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Genital mutilation</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vareda, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valente, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alho, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paixão, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vareda, R</au><au>Valente, J</au><au>Alho, AM</au><au>Carmona, A</au><au>Chaves, D</au><au>Silva, L</au><au>Ribeiro, S</au><au>Paixão, M</au><au>Leite, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multisectoral approach to address Female Genital Mutilation: a case study from Portugal</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2022-10-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Issue
Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that injury female genital organs for non-medical reasons, with several health impacts. Due to global migration, FGM has been increasingly recognised as a healthcare issue in Europe, affecting nearly 1 million women. In Portugal it is estimated that 5483 migrant women have undergone FGM in the Lisbon region. Intervention is required to tackle this issue.
Description
Portugal launched the "Healthy Practices: End of FGM", a multiagency project targeting Lisbon and Tagus Valley region. Project implementation started in Nov 2018 at 5 local public health units (PHU) and was scaled-up to 5 more in Feb 2020. Project comprises 3 main axes: 1) inclusion in public policy instruments; 2) professionals' education and awareness; and 3) community intervention. We describe inclusion of FGM in public policy, professionals training and changes in FGM recording before and after intervention.
Results
Between 2018-2022, inclusion of FGM in municipalities' migration policies doubled. Between 2019-2021, 110 training sessions (n = 1722 professionals) were promoted. During pandemic years, only 344 (2020) and 202 (2021) were trained. Raising awareness and empowerment to risk communities happened mainly through local/online open sessions, workshops, flyer distribution, video projections. These occurred in all 10 PHU, mostly through partnerships with Non-Governmental Organizations and municipalities. According to the Portuguese Health Records, until 2018 there were only 300 women registered with FGM. Between 2019-2021, 363 more were added.
Lessons
The multisectoral approach allowed PHU professionals to collaborate directly with external organizations from different society sectors. COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge to implementation, especially in the community intervention axis. Notification numbers increased after interventions, though causality could not be established and impact evaluation is yet to be performed.
Key messages
* Multisectoral projects for FGM intervention have specific implementation challenges, including how to justify and evaluate them, that must be considered in each setting.
* Training health professionals might increase identification and notification of FGM, but the impact in preventing FGM in the Portuguese reality is still largely unknown.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.460</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3) |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2854902434 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central Free; PAIS Index |
subjects | Case studies COVID-19 Empowerment Female circumcision Females Genital mutilation Implementation Intervention Medical personnel Medical records Migration Municipalities NGOs Nongovernmental organizations Pandemics Professionals Public health Public policy Regions Training Women |
title | Multisectoral approach to address Female Genital Mutilation: a case study from Portugal |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multisectoral%20approach%20to%20address%20Female%20Genital%20Mutilation:%20a%20case%20study%20from%20Portugal&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Vareda,%20R&rft.date=2022-10-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854902434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1530-2b1334622f2a9bf3f7db3b64be247185d66928d0234ccc82bb6005429133237e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854902434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.460&rfr_iscdi=true |