Loading…
Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements
Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Tsai, Ethan Artemyev, Anton Angelopoulos, Vassilis Zhang, Xiao‐Jia |
description | Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation.
Plain Language Summary
Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2023JA031578 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2857862868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857862868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiQS9-QCbeHW122633eOGAEIgGiPhuGl3ByhZutgWDDcfwWf0SSxBE0_OZf7kN99kPoRuEnyfYJI_EEzouMA0YVycoQ5JsjzOU0zOf2sq8CW6dm6NQ4gwSlgHrUZmD87rpfTaLKP5SjvfgP36-Jy2NURzuYdoZDwYp_0hKpo2QAMNTR1NtAEXzdxxrd9A5W1romcLld5qH9RCNwXpdhY2YLy7QhcL2Ti4_sldNBv0X3uP8eRpOOoVk7iimLO4EpmgQlHCBWeEKKJ4LeUioaBqlqosVYpylVGSyjoTAWCJqKlIWUp5oBjtotuT7ta2b7vwWrlud9aEkyURwZqMHC900d2JqmzrnIVFubV6I-2hTHB5tLP8a2fA6Ql_1w0c_mXL8fClYDzPGP0GIbN25Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857862868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Tsai, Ethan ; Artemyev, Anton ; Angelopoulos, Vassilis ; Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ethan ; Artemyev, Anton ; Angelopoulos, Vassilis ; Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creatorcontrib><description>Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (<200 keV) electron precipitation events, but deviates significantly for relativistic (>200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation.
Plain Language Summary
Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) with large ensemble test‐particle simulations informed by current empirical models of waves. Discrepancies in this comparison suggest that this elusive population of mid‐to‐high‐latitude whistler‐mode waves is most apparent at Earth's nightside and may even help explain some of the more intense precipitation events observed by the ELFIN CubeSats.
Key Points
We evaluate the role of whistler‐mode waves on relativistic electron precipitation by modeling ELFIN case‐studies and statistics
Observed precipitation >200 keV exceeds results obtained with empirical models of latitudinal wave power distributions, notably at night
The discrepancy may be explained by mid‐to‐high‐latitude intense whistler‐mode waves which are missing from current empirical models</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023JA031578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Cubesat ; Cyclotron resonance ; Earth ; Earth magnetosphere ; Electron flux ; Electron precipitation ; ELFIN ; Empirical models ; Energy spectra ; Equator ; Interaction models ; Jupiter ; Latitude ; latitudinal distribution of wave power ; Modelling ; nonlinear wave‐particle interaction ; Particle interactions ; Plasma density ; Plasma waves ; Precipitation measurements ; Radiation ; Radiation belt electrons ; radiation belt modeling ; Radiation belts ; Relativistic effects ; relativistic electron precipitation ; Resonant interactions ; Spacecraft ; Spatial distribution ; Statistical models ; Wave measurement ; Wave models ; Wave power ; Waveforms ; whistler wave ; Whistlers</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7024-1561 ; 0000-0001-8823-4474 ; 0000-0002-4185-5465 ; 0000-0002-8697-6789</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artemyev, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (<200 keV) electron precipitation events, but deviates significantly for relativistic (>200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation.
Plain Language Summary
Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) with large ensemble test‐particle simulations informed by current empirical models of waves. Discrepancies in this comparison suggest that this elusive population of mid‐to‐high‐latitude whistler‐mode waves is most apparent at Earth's nightside and may even help explain some of the more intense precipitation events observed by the ELFIN CubeSats.
Key Points
We evaluate the role of whistler‐mode waves on relativistic electron precipitation by modeling ELFIN case‐studies and statistics
Observed precipitation >200 keV exceeds results obtained with empirical models of latitudinal wave power distributions, notably at night
The discrepancy may be explained by mid‐to‐high‐latitude intense whistler‐mode waves which are missing from current empirical models</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Cubesat</subject><subject>Cyclotron resonance</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Electron flux</subject><subject>Electron precipitation</subject><subject>ELFIN</subject><subject>Empirical models</subject><subject>Energy spectra</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>Interaction models</subject><subject>Jupiter</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>latitudinal distribution of wave power</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>nonlinear wave‐particle interaction</subject><subject>Particle interactions</subject><subject>Plasma density</subject><subject>Plasma waves</subject><subject>Precipitation measurements</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation belt electrons</subject><subject>radiation belt modeling</subject><subject>Radiation belts</subject><subject>Relativistic effects</subject><subject>relativistic electron precipitation</subject><subject>Resonant interactions</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Wave measurement</subject><subject>Wave models</subject><subject>Wave power</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><subject>whistler wave</subject><subject>Whistlers</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiQS9-QCbeHW122633eOGAEIgGiPhuGl3ByhZutgWDDcfwWf0SSxBE0_OZf7kN99kPoRuEnyfYJI_EEzouMA0YVycoQ5JsjzOU0zOf2sq8CW6dm6NQ4gwSlgHrUZmD87rpfTaLKP5SjvfgP36-Jy2NURzuYdoZDwYp_0hKpo2QAMNTR1NtAEXzdxxrd9A5W1romcLld5qH9RCNwXpdhY2YLy7QhcL2Ti4_sldNBv0X3uP8eRpOOoVk7iimLO4EpmgQlHCBWeEKKJ4LeUioaBqlqosVYpylVGSyjoTAWCJqKlIWUp5oBjtotuT7ta2b7vwWrlud9aEkyURwZqMHC900d2JqmzrnIVFubV6I-2hTHB5tLP8a2fA6Ql_1w0c_mXL8fClYDzPGP0GIbN25Q</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Tsai, Ethan</creator><creator>Artemyev, Anton</creator><creator>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-1561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-4474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-5465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-6789</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</title><author>Tsai, Ethan ; Artemyev, Anton ; Angelopoulos, Vassilis ; Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Cubesat</topic><topic>Cyclotron resonance</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Electron flux</topic><topic>Electron precipitation</topic><topic>ELFIN</topic><topic>Empirical models</topic><topic>Energy spectra</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>Interaction models</topic><topic>Jupiter</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>latitudinal distribution of wave power</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>nonlinear wave‐particle interaction</topic><topic>Particle interactions</topic><topic>Plasma density</topic><topic>Plasma waves</topic><topic>Precipitation measurements</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation belt electrons</topic><topic>radiation belt modeling</topic><topic>Radiation belts</topic><topic>Relativistic effects</topic><topic>relativistic electron precipitation</topic><topic>Resonant interactions</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Wave measurement</topic><topic>Wave models</topic><topic>Wave power</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><topic>whistler wave</topic><topic>Whistlers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artemyev, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsai, Ethan</au><au>Artemyev, Anton</au><au>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</au><au>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (<200 keV) electron precipitation events, but deviates significantly for relativistic (>200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation.
Plain Language Summary
Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) with large ensemble test‐particle simulations informed by current empirical models of waves. Discrepancies in this comparison suggest that this elusive population of mid‐to‐high‐latitude whistler‐mode waves is most apparent at Earth's nightside and may even help explain some of the more intense precipitation events observed by the ELFIN CubeSats.
Key Points
We evaluate the role of whistler‐mode waves on relativistic electron precipitation by modeling ELFIN case‐studies and statistics
Observed precipitation >200 keV exceeds results obtained with empirical models of latitudinal wave power distributions, notably at night
The discrepancy may be explained by mid‐to‐high‐latitude intense whistler‐mode waves which are missing from current empirical models</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2023JA031578</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-1561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-4474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-5465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-6789</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9380 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2857862868 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Atmospheric models Cubesat Cyclotron resonance Earth Earth magnetosphere Electron flux Electron precipitation ELFIN Empirical models Energy spectra Equator Interaction models Jupiter Latitude latitudinal distribution of wave power Modelling nonlinear wave‐particle interaction Particle interactions Plasma density Plasma waves Precipitation measurements Radiation Radiation belt electrons radiation belt modeling Radiation belts Relativistic effects relativistic electron precipitation Resonant interactions Spacecraft Spatial distribution Statistical models Wave measurement Wave models Wave power Waveforms whistler wave Whistlers |
title | Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20Whistler%E2%80%90Mode%20Wave%20Intensity%20Along%20Field%20Lines%20Using%20Electron%20Precipitation%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Tsai,%20Ethan&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023JA031578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857862868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857862868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |