Loading…

Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements

Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a
Main Authors: Tsai, Ethan, Artemyev, Anton, Angelopoulos, Vassilis, Zhang, Xiao‐Jia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 128
creator Tsai, Ethan
Artemyev, Anton
Angelopoulos, Vassilis
Zhang, Xiao‐Jia
description Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation. Plain Language Summary Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA)
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2023JA031578
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2857862868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857862868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiQS9-QCbeHW122633eOGAEIgGiPhuGl3ByhZutgWDDcfwWf0SSxBE0_OZf7kN99kPoRuEnyfYJI_EEzouMA0YVycoQ5JsjzOU0zOf2sq8CW6dm6NQ4gwSlgHrUZmD87rpfTaLKP5SjvfgP36-Jy2NURzuYdoZDwYp_0hKpo2QAMNTR1NtAEXzdxxrd9A5W1romcLld5qH9RCNwXpdhY2YLy7QhcL2Ti4_sldNBv0X3uP8eRpOOoVk7iimLO4EpmgQlHCBWeEKKJ4LeUioaBqlqosVYpylVGSyjoTAWCJqKlIWUp5oBjtotuT7ta2b7vwWrlud9aEkyURwZqMHC900d2JqmzrnIVFubV6I-2hTHB5tLP8a2fA6Ql_1w0c_mXL8fClYDzPGP0GIbN25Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857862868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Tsai, Ethan ; Artemyev, Anton ; Angelopoulos, Vassilis ; Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ethan ; Artemyev, Anton ; Angelopoulos, Vassilis ; Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creatorcontrib><description>Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (&lt;200 keV) electron precipitation events, but deviates significantly for relativistic (&gt;200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation. Plain Language Summary Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) with large ensemble test‐particle simulations informed by current empirical models of waves. Discrepancies in this comparison suggest that this elusive population of mid‐to‐high‐latitude whistler‐mode waves is most apparent at Earth's nightside and may even help explain some of the more intense precipitation events observed by the ELFIN CubeSats. Key Points We evaluate the role of whistler‐mode waves on relativistic electron precipitation by modeling ELFIN case‐studies and statistics Observed precipitation &gt;200 keV exceeds results obtained with empirical models of latitudinal wave power distributions, notably at night The discrepancy may be explained by mid‐to‐high‐latitude intense whistler‐mode waves which are missing from current empirical models</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023JA031578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Cubesat ; Cyclotron resonance ; Earth ; Earth magnetosphere ; Electron flux ; Electron precipitation ; ELFIN ; Empirical models ; Energy spectra ; Equator ; Interaction models ; Jupiter ; Latitude ; latitudinal distribution of wave power ; Modelling ; nonlinear wave‐particle interaction ; Particle interactions ; Plasma density ; Plasma waves ; Precipitation measurements ; Radiation ; Radiation belt electrons ; radiation belt modeling ; Radiation belts ; Relativistic effects ; relativistic electron precipitation ; Resonant interactions ; Spacecraft ; Spatial distribution ; Statistical models ; Wave measurement ; Wave models ; Wave power ; Waveforms ; whistler wave ; Whistlers</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7024-1561 ; 0000-0001-8823-4474 ; 0000-0002-4185-5465 ; 0000-0002-8697-6789</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artemyev, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (&lt;200 keV) electron precipitation events, but deviates significantly for relativistic (&gt;200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation. Plain Language Summary Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) with large ensemble test‐particle simulations informed by current empirical models of waves. Discrepancies in this comparison suggest that this elusive population of mid‐to‐high‐latitude whistler‐mode waves is most apparent at Earth's nightside and may even help explain some of the more intense precipitation events observed by the ELFIN CubeSats. Key Points We evaluate the role of whistler‐mode waves on relativistic electron precipitation by modeling ELFIN case‐studies and statistics Observed precipitation &gt;200 keV exceeds results obtained with empirical models of latitudinal wave power distributions, notably at night The discrepancy may be explained by mid‐to‐high‐latitude intense whistler‐mode waves which are missing from current empirical models</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Cubesat</subject><subject>Cyclotron resonance</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Electron flux</subject><subject>Electron precipitation</subject><subject>ELFIN</subject><subject>Empirical models</subject><subject>Energy spectra</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>Interaction models</subject><subject>Jupiter</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>latitudinal distribution of wave power</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>nonlinear wave‐particle interaction</subject><subject>Particle interactions</subject><subject>Plasma density</subject><subject>Plasma waves</subject><subject>Precipitation measurements</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation belt electrons</subject><subject>radiation belt modeling</subject><subject>Radiation belts</subject><subject>Relativistic effects</subject><subject>relativistic electron precipitation</subject><subject>Resonant interactions</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Wave measurement</subject><subject>Wave models</subject><subject>Wave power</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><subject>whistler wave</subject><subject>Whistlers</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiQS9-QCbeHW122633eOGAEIgGiPhuGl3ByhZutgWDDcfwWf0SSxBE0_OZf7kN99kPoRuEnyfYJI_EEzouMA0YVycoQ5JsjzOU0zOf2sq8CW6dm6NQ4gwSlgHrUZmD87rpfTaLKP5SjvfgP36-Jy2NURzuYdoZDwYp_0hKpo2QAMNTR1NtAEXzdxxrd9A5W1romcLld5qH9RCNwXpdhY2YLy7QhcL2Ti4_sldNBv0X3uP8eRpOOoVk7iimLO4EpmgQlHCBWeEKKJ4LeUioaBqlqosVYpylVGSyjoTAWCJqKlIWUp5oBjtotuT7ta2b7vwWrlud9aEkyURwZqMHC900d2JqmzrnIVFubV6I-2hTHB5tLP8a2fA6Ql_1w0c_mXL8fClYDzPGP0GIbN25Q</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Tsai, Ethan</creator><creator>Artemyev, Anton</creator><creator>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-1561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-4474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-5465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-6789</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</title><author>Tsai, Ethan ; Artemyev, Anton ; Angelopoulos, Vassilis ; Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Cubesat</topic><topic>Cyclotron resonance</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Electron flux</topic><topic>Electron precipitation</topic><topic>ELFIN</topic><topic>Empirical models</topic><topic>Energy spectra</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>Interaction models</topic><topic>Jupiter</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>latitudinal distribution of wave power</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>nonlinear wave‐particle interaction</topic><topic>Particle interactions</topic><topic>Plasma density</topic><topic>Plasma waves</topic><topic>Precipitation measurements</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation belt electrons</topic><topic>radiation belt modeling</topic><topic>Radiation belts</topic><topic>Relativistic effects</topic><topic>relativistic electron precipitation</topic><topic>Resonant interactions</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Wave measurement</topic><topic>Wave models</topic><topic>Wave power</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><topic>whistler wave</topic><topic>Whistlers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artemyev, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsai, Ethan</au><au>Artemyev, Anton</au><au>Angelopoulos, Vassilis</au><au>Zhang, Xiao‐Jia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Electron fluxes in Earth's radiation belts are significantly affected by their resonant interaction with whistler‐mode waves. This wave‐particle interaction often occurs via first cyclotron resonance and, when intense and nonlinear, can accelerate subrelativistic electrons to relativistic energies while also scattering them into the atmospheric loss cone. Here, we model Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation’s (ELFIN) low‐altitude satellite measurements of precipitating electron spectra with a wave‐electron interaction model to infer the profiles of whistler‐mode intensity along magnetic latitude assuming realistic waveforms and statistical models of plasma density. We then compare these profiles with a wave power spatial distribution along field lines from an empirical model. We find that this empirical model is consistent with observations of subrelativistic (&lt;200 keV) electron precipitation events, but deviates significantly for relativistic (&gt;200 keV) electron precipitation events at all MLTs, especially on the nightside. This may be due to the sparse coverage of wave measurements at mid‐to‐high latitudes which causes statistically averaged wave power to be likely underestimated in current empirical wave models. As a result, this discrepancy suggests that intense waves likely do propagate to higher latitudes, although further investigation is required to quantify how well this high‐latitude population can account for the observed relativistic electron precipitation. Plain Language Summary Whistler‐mode waves, the most prevalent type of plasma wave in Earth's magnetosphere, often interact with electrons by resonating with them, causing them to be accelerated and lost into Earth's atmosphere (in other words, precipitated). These waves are generated at the equator and typically stay constrained to within 20° in latitude; however, they can sometimes propagate to greater than 30° where they can accelerate electrons to relativistic energies. It is difficult to quantify how large of a contribution these mid‐to‐high‐latitude waves have on radiation belt electrons due to a lack of off‐equatorial spacecraft wave measurements. However, previous studies have shown that the energy spectra of precipitating electron fluxes may be used to infer the latitudinal extent of whistler‐mode waves. We therefore compare measurements of relativistic precipitation from NASA's Electron Losses and Fields INvestgation (ELFIN) mission (a pair of CubeSats built and operated by UCLA) with large ensemble test‐particle simulations informed by current empirical models of waves. Discrepancies in this comparison suggest that this elusive population of mid‐to‐high‐latitude whistler‐mode waves is most apparent at Earth's nightside and may even help explain some of the more intense precipitation events observed by the ELFIN CubeSats. Key Points We evaluate the role of whistler‐mode waves on relativistic electron precipitation by modeling ELFIN case‐studies and statistics Observed precipitation &gt;200 keV exceeds results obtained with empirical models of latitudinal wave power distributions, notably at night The discrepancy may be explained by mid‐to‐high‐latitude intense whistler‐mode waves which are missing from current empirical models</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2023JA031578</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-1561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-4474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-5465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-6789</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2857862868
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Atmospheric models
Cubesat
Cyclotron resonance
Earth
Earth magnetosphere
Electron flux
Electron precipitation
ELFIN
Empirical models
Energy spectra
Equator
Interaction models
Jupiter
Latitude
latitudinal distribution of wave power
Modelling
nonlinear wave‐particle interaction
Particle interactions
Plasma density
Plasma waves
Precipitation measurements
Radiation
Radiation belt electrons
radiation belt modeling
Radiation belts
Relativistic effects
relativistic electron precipitation
Resonant interactions
Spacecraft
Spatial distribution
Statistical models
Wave measurement
Wave models
Wave power
Waveforms
whistler wave
Whistlers
title Investigating Whistler‐Mode Wave Intensity Along Field Lines Using Electron Precipitation Measurements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20Whistler%E2%80%90Mode%20Wave%20Intensity%20Along%20Field%20Lines%20Using%20Electron%20Precipitation%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Tsai,%20Ethan&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023JA031578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857862868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3075-c86838b32787522b2b7daaf13ebd54b64bb37b6324ad6822b518d3845437f1353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857862868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true