Resettling at the Precipice: Deepening Vulnerabilities in Disaster Recovery from Upland Sulawesi

We analyze a 2006 landslide disaster in Indonesia that caused two neighboring villages to rebuild on increasingly precarious terrain. We use the pressure and release (PAR) model to examine natural hazards and disaster from a historical perspective, situating the origins of vulnerability among commun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human ecology : an interdisciplinary journal 2023-08, Vol.51 (4), p.737-751
Main Authors: Sirimorok, Nurhady, Batiran, Karno B., Fisher, Micah R., Verheijen, Bart, Nursaputra, Munajat, Sahide, Muhammad Alif K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropology
Community
Development policy
Disaster management
Disaster recovery
Disaster risk
Disasters
Emergency preparedness
Environmental Management
Fieldwork
Geography
Historical development
Landslides
Landslides & mudslides
Reconstruction
Recovery plans
Relocation
Resilience
Risk
Social Sciences
Sociology
Villages
Vulnerability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We analyze a 2006 landslide disaster in Indonesia that caused two neighboring villages to rebuild on increasingly precarious terrain. We use the pressure and release (PAR) model to examine natural hazards and disaster from a historical perspective, situating the origins of vulnerability among communities pushed to resettle in increasingly dangerous areas. From 2011, we conducted an initial five months of field research in two villages in Upland Sulawesi, followed by sustained engagement to trace the siting and reconstruction of settlements in locations highly prone to landslides in order to understand the conditions that led communities to rebuild in locations at heightened risk from similar landslide events. In doing so we extend research on the ways vulnerability and disaster risk extend into processes of recovery. Our extended analysis highlights the relational and unequal adaptive capacities unfolding among villagers. Our findings revealed that a combination of government development policies and market mechanisms established the roots of differentiated vulnerabilities, which were thereafter reinforced through disaster recovery planning and reconstruction initiatives. Thus, we show that risk and resilience are not only connected to a disaster event but also to efforts to rebuild and recover, illustrating how vulnerability is reproduced alongside initiatives intended to help communities recuperate and build resilience.
ISSN:0300-7839
1572-9915
DOI:10.1007/s10745-023-00422-z