Loading…

Changes to fish assemblage following the selective removal of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas)

Black bullhead is among the most abundant and successful non‐native fish species in European fresh waters. A number of studies have indicated that its physical removal might be a potential solution to minimize possible adverse impacts; however, so far there have been no field studies to confirm this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic conservation 2023-09, Vol.33 (9), p.981-994
Main Authors: Jaćimović, Milica Lj, Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M., Nikolić, Dušan, Cvijanović, Gorčin D., Spasić, Slađana Z., Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V., Skorić, Stefan B., Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203
container_end_page 994
container_issue 9
container_start_page 981
container_title Aquatic conservation
container_volume 33
creator Jaćimović, Milica Lj
Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M.
Nikolić, Dušan
Cvijanović, Gorčin D.
Spasić, Slađana Z.
Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V.
Skorić, Stefan B.
Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina
description Black bullhead is among the most abundant and successful non‐native fish species in European fresh waters. A number of studies have indicated that its physical removal might be a potential solution to minimize possible adverse impacts; however, so far there have been no field studies to confirm this. This study quantified the population dynamics of both native and non‐native fishes in a small slow‐running lowland river within the Ponjavica Nature Park in Serbia before and after the black bullhead removal with fyke nets. The removal of black bullhead resulted in statistically significant changes in the abundance of two native species – an increase in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) (by 5.3 times) and a decline in bleak (Alburnus alburnus) (by 2.3 times). A significant increase was observed in three non‐native fish species – the abundances of topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva), pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) increased 25.5, 4.9 and 4.2 times, respectively. There were also substantial changes in the diversity of the fish assemblage after the black bullhead removal, illustrated by changes in diversity indices: Shannon's index doubled, while the Simpson's dominance index decreased threefold. The catch‐per‐unit‐effort and the biomass‐per‐unit‐effort values indicated the dominance of the black bullhead in the fish assemblage during the mass removal phase of the study. The young‐of‐the‐year/adult ratio did not vary in relation to abundance, which confirmed that black bullhead might not compensate for fishing mortality with increased recruitment. The results suggest that black bullhead plays a significant role in structuring the fish assemblage and that its removal may have both positive and negative effects on species abundance and diversity. These findings can contribute to the conservation of native fish species and improvement of future management programmes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aqc.3986
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2859553511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2859553511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUwPEiCs4p-CcEvMxDZ340bXIcxV8wEEGPEtLsZe1Mly1pN_bf2zmvnt47fHgPvklyS_CUYEwf9NZMmRT5WTIiWMoUF5yfH3dO0yIn7DK5inGFMZY5yUfJV1nr9RIi6jyyTayRjhHayuklIOud8_tmvURdDSiCA9M1O0ABWr_TDnmLBmi-UdU7V4NeoMmshaYPfUQtOB3vr5MLq12Em785Tj6fHj_Kl3T-9vxazuapYbTIU40zA8IQK4ucVTjThSbSCkGxrfhCsAxyaeQApKBVRitSCWtExiqtMckpZuPk7nR3E_y2h9iple_DenipqOCSc8YJGdTkpEzwMQawahOaVoeDIlgd46khnjrGG2h6ovvGweFfp2bv5a__Ad32b8c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2859553511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes to fish assemblage following the selective removal of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas)</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Jaćimović, Milica Lj ; Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M. ; Nikolić, Dušan ; Cvijanović, Gorčin D. ; Spasić, Slađana Z. ; Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V. ; Skorić, Stefan B. ; Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaćimović, Milica Lj ; Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M. ; Nikolić, Dušan ; Cvijanović, Gorčin D. ; Spasić, Slađana Z. ; Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V. ; Skorić, Stefan B. ; Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><description>Black bullhead is among the most abundant and successful non‐native fish species in European fresh waters. A number of studies have indicated that its physical removal might be a potential solution to minimize possible adverse impacts; however, so far there have been no field studies to confirm this. This study quantified the population dynamics of both native and non‐native fishes in a small slow‐running lowland river within the Ponjavica Nature Park in Serbia before and after the black bullhead removal with fyke nets. The removal of black bullhead resulted in statistically significant changes in the abundance of two native species – an increase in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) (by 5.3 times) and a decline in bleak (Alburnus alburnus) (by 2.3 times). A significant increase was observed in three non‐native fish species – the abundances of topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva), pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) increased 25.5, 4.9 and 4.2 times, respectively. There were also substantial changes in the diversity of the fish assemblage after the black bullhead removal, illustrated by changes in diversity indices: Shannon's index doubled, while the Simpson's dominance index decreased threefold. The catch‐per‐unit‐effort and the biomass‐per‐unit‐effort values indicated the dominance of the black bullhead in the fish assemblage during the mass removal phase of the study. The young‐of‐the‐year/adult ratio did not vary in relation to abundance, which confirmed that black bullhead might not compensate for fishing mortality with increased recruitment. The results suggest that black bullhead plays a significant role in structuring the fish assemblage and that its removal may have both positive and negative effects on species abundance and diversity. These findings can contribute to the conservation of native fish species and improvement of future management programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Alburnus alburnus ; Ameiurus melas ; Carassius gibelio ; catch‐per‐unit‐effort ; community diversity ; Diversity indices ; Dominance ; Fish ; Fish conservation ; fish management ; fish population dynamics ; Fishing ; Fishing mortality ; Fishing nets ; Indigenous species ; Invasive species ; Lepomis gibbosus ; mass removal ; Native organisms ; Nonnative species ; non‐native fish ; Population dynamics ; Population studies ; Pseudorasbora parva ; Removal ; Scardinius erythrophthalmus ; slow‐running lowland river ; Species diversity ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2023-09, Vol.33 (9), p.981-994</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6354-6145 ; 0000-0001-9773-9917 ; 0000-0003-2004-1662 ; 0000-0003-1098-371X ; 0000-0002-8995-2934 ; 0000-0002-8206-2138 ; 0000-0002-3577-2735 ; 0000-0003-4346-1432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaćimović, Milica Lj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cvijanović, Gorčin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spasić, Slađana Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skorić, Stefan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><title>Changes to fish assemblage following the selective removal of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas)</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Black bullhead is among the most abundant and successful non‐native fish species in European fresh waters. A number of studies have indicated that its physical removal might be a potential solution to minimize possible adverse impacts; however, so far there have been no field studies to confirm this. This study quantified the population dynamics of both native and non‐native fishes in a small slow‐running lowland river within the Ponjavica Nature Park in Serbia before and after the black bullhead removal with fyke nets. The removal of black bullhead resulted in statistically significant changes in the abundance of two native species – an increase in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) (by 5.3 times) and a decline in bleak (Alburnus alburnus) (by 2.3 times). A significant increase was observed in three non‐native fish species – the abundances of topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva), pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) increased 25.5, 4.9 and 4.2 times, respectively. There were also substantial changes in the diversity of the fish assemblage after the black bullhead removal, illustrated by changes in diversity indices: Shannon's index doubled, while the Simpson's dominance index decreased threefold. The catch‐per‐unit‐effort and the biomass‐per‐unit‐effort values indicated the dominance of the black bullhead in the fish assemblage during the mass removal phase of the study. The young‐of‐the‐year/adult ratio did not vary in relation to abundance, which confirmed that black bullhead might not compensate for fishing mortality with increased recruitment. The results suggest that black bullhead plays a significant role in structuring the fish assemblage and that its removal may have both positive and negative effects on species abundance and diversity. These findings can contribute to the conservation of native fish species and improvement of future management programmes.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Alburnus alburnus</subject><subject>Ameiurus melas</subject><subject>Carassius gibelio</subject><subject>catch‐per‐unit‐effort</subject><subject>community diversity</subject><subject>Diversity indices</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish conservation</subject><subject>fish management</subject><subject>fish population dynamics</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing mortality</subject><subject>Fishing nets</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lepomis gibbosus</subject><subject>mass removal</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>non‐native fish</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pseudorasbora parva</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Scardinius erythrophthalmus</subject><subject>slow‐running lowland river</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUwPEiCs4p-CcEvMxDZ340bXIcxV8wEEGPEtLsZe1Mly1pN_bf2zmvnt47fHgPvklyS_CUYEwf9NZMmRT5WTIiWMoUF5yfH3dO0yIn7DK5inGFMZY5yUfJV1nr9RIi6jyyTayRjhHayuklIOud8_tmvURdDSiCA9M1O0ABWr_TDnmLBmi-UdU7V4NeoMmshaYPfUQtOB3vr5MLq12Em785Tj6fHj_Kl3T-9vxazuapYbTIU40zA8IQK4ucVTjThSbSCkGxrfhCsAxyaeQApKBVRitSCWtExiqtMckpZuPk7nR3E_y2h9iple_DenipqOCSc8YJGdTkpEzwMQawahOaVoeDIlgd46khnjrGG2h6ovvGweFfp2bv5a__Ad32b8c</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Jaćimović, Milica Lj</creator><creator>Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M.</creator><creator>Nikolić, Dušan</creator><creator>Cvijanović, Gorčin D.</creator><creator>Spasić, Slađana Z.</creator><creator>Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V.</creator><creator>Skorić, Stefan B.</creator><creator>Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6354-6145</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-9917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-1662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1098-371X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-2934</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-2138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-2735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-1432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Changes to fish assemblage following the selective removal of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas)</title><author>Jaćimović, Milica Lj ; Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M. ; Nikolić, Dušan ; Cvijanović, Gorčin D. ; Spasić, Slađana Z. ; Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V. ; Skorić, Stefan B. ; Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Alburnus alburnus</topic><topic>Ameiurus melas</topic><topic>Carassius gibelio</topic><topic>catch‐per‐unit‐effort</topic><topic>community diversity</topic><topic>Diversity indices</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish conservation</topic><topic>fish management</topic><topic>fish population dynamics</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing mortality</topic><topic>Fishing nets</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lepomis gibbosus</topic><topic>mass removal</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>non‐native fish</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pseudorasbora parva</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Scardinius erythrophthalmus</topic><topic>slow‐running lowland river</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaćimović, Milica Lj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cvijanović, Gorčin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spasić, Slađana Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skorić, Stefan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaćimović, Milica Lj</au><au>Smederevac‐Lalić, Marija M.</au><au>Nikolić, Dušan</au><au>Cvijanović, Gorčin D.</au><au>Spasić, Slađana Z.</au><au>Višnjić‐Jeftić, Željka V.</au><au>Skorić, Stefan B.</au><au>Krpo‐Ćetković, Jasmina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes to fish assemblage following the selective removal of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas)</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>994</epage><pages>981-994</pages><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Black bullhead is among the most abundant and successful non‐native fish species in European fresh waters. A number of studies have indicated that its physical removal might be a potential solution to minimize possible adverse impacts; however, so far there have been no field studies to confirm this. This study quantified the population dynamics of both native and non‐native fishes in a small slow‐running lowland river within the Ponjavica Nature Park in Serbia before and after the black bullhead removal with fyke nets. The removal of black bullhead resulted in statistically significant changes in the abundance of two native species – an increase in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) (by 5.3 times) and a decline in bleak (Alburnus alburnus) (by 2.3 times). A significant increase was observed in three non‐native fish species – the abundances of topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva), pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) increased 25.5, 4.9 and 4.2 times, respectively. There were also substantial changes in the diversity of the fish assemblage after the black bullhead removal, illustrated by changes in diversity indices: Shannon's index doubled, while the Simpson's dominance index decreased threefold. The catch‐per‐unit‐effort and the biomass‐per‐unit‐effort values indicated the dominance of the black bullhead in the fish assemblage during the mass removal phase of the study. The young‐of‐the‐year/adult ratio did not vary in relation to abundance, which confirmed that black bullhead might not compensate for fishing mortality with increased recruitment. The results suggest that black bullhead plays a significant role in structuring the fish assemblage and that its removal may have both positive and negative effects on species abundance and diversity. These findings can contribute to the conservation of native fish species and improvement of future management programmes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.3986</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6354-6145</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-9917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-1662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1098-371X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-2934</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-2138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-2735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-1432</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-7613
ispartof Aquatic conservation, 2023-09, Vol.33 (9), p.981-994
issn 1052-7613
1099-0755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2859553511
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abundance
Alburnus alburnus
Ameiurus melas
Carassius gibelio
catch‐per‐unit‐effort
community diversity
Diversity indices
Dominance
Fish
Fish conservation
fish management
fish population dynamics
Fishing
Fishing mortality
Fishing nets
Indigenous species
Invasive species
Lepomis gibbosus
mass removal
Native organisms
Nonnative species
non‐native fish
Population dynamics
Population studies
Pseudorasbora parva
Removal
Scardinius erythrophthalmus
slow‐running lowland river
Species diversity
Statistical analysis
title Changes to fish assemblage following the selective removal of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A01%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20to%20fish%20assemblage%20following%20the%20selective%20removal%20of%20black%20bullhead%20(Ameiurus%20melas)&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Ja%C4%87imovi%C4%87,%20Milica%20Lj&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=994&rft.pages=981-994&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.3986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2859553511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-a04ce8c1f9763b04a7a19f8820fb5d834e69c98c1982b42b1b8fc843baa016203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2859553511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true