Loading…

A detailed statistical analysis of the performance of CO-RADS and CT-severity score in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to RT-PCR test: a prospective cohort study

Background Reports from international studies regarding the role of CT scan and RT-PCR test in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease has been a subject of controversy. The purpose of this study was to statistically compare the performance of CT in reporting chest CT scans of coronavirus disease accor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine 2023-12, Vol.54 (1), p.148-12
Main Authors: Hadad, Zeina, Afzelius, Pia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 148
container_title Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine
container_volume 54
creator Hadad, Zeina
Afzelius, Pia
description Background Reports from international studies regarding the role of CT scan and RT-PCR test in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease has been a subject of controversy. The purpose of this study was to statistically compare the performance of CT in reporting chest CT scans of coronavirus disease according to Coronavirus Disease Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT severity score (CTSS) with the performance of RT-PCR test. Results The analyzed CT scans of 144 participants were consistent with CO-RADS 1 (n = 38), CO-RADS 2 (n = 11), CO-RADS 3 (n = 35), CO-RADS 4 (n = 23), and CO-RADS 5 (n = 37). CTSS in CO-RADS 1 was (0.9 ± 4), CO-RADS 2 (4 ± 2), CO-RADS 3 (10.2 ± 2), CO-RADS 4 (14 ± 6) and CO-RADS 5 (19 ± 7). There was direct correlation between CO-RADS groups and CTSS (p < 0.001). The mean total CTSS was 10 ± 9 for the whole study population. Ninety-five CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 3, 4 or 5 and 49 CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 1 or 2, with a positive rate of 66% (95% CI 49%, 65%), PPV (55.41%), NPV (45.18%), accuracy (86.8%) and the overall sensitivity (93.18%) and specificity (76.8%) of CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia when categorized and analyzed according to CO-RADS and CTSS. Sixty-four patients had positive initial RT-PCR tests and 80 patients had negative initial RT-PCR test, with a positive rate of 44.4% (95% CI 35%, 51%), PPV (41.13%), NPV (59.51%), accuracy (74.3%), sensitivity (64.2%) and specificity (93.9%). The Kappa ([kappa]) value of average inter-reader agreement was 88% (95% CI 80%, 96%). Conclusions RT-PCR test showed higher specificity and NPV compared to CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia, while CT showed higher sensitivity, PPV, accuracy and positive rate, respectively. CT was superior to RT-PCR test in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia especially at early stages of the disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s43055-023-01099-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2860449247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A763411970</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_158f78cb115f4f0688ae7629613ff92f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A763411970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-eee182f38dd2d2197ba3cd12500ec0789c010045b441de4078b658f45ba0f08e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUdGKEzEUDaJgqfsDPgV8znozk8lkfCuzuhYWKrWKb0Oa3HRTOpMxSRf6U36jcXdBH0weAodzzr3nhJC3HK45V_J9EjU0DYOqZsCh65h8QRYVdMBEK6uXZAF1q5iE-sdrcpXSEcoRAFyKBfm1ohaz9ie0NGWdfcre6BPVkz5dkk80OJrvkc4YXYijngz-gfoN265uvhaapf2OJXzA6POFJhMiUj89aqzXhyk8m_Sb7-sbxjs6T3gew-Q1NWGcdSyDc6DbHfvSb2nGlD9QTecY0owm-wcstPsQc9nubC9vyCunTwmvnt8l-fbp467_zO42t-t-dceMEG1miMhV5WplbWUr3rV7XRvLqwYADbSqM6UoEM1eCG5RFGQvG-UKoMGBwnpJ1k--NujjMEc_6ngZgvbDIxDiYdCxNHXCgRdhq8ye88YJB1IpjaX2TvLaua4ssSTvnrxKqJ_nEnA4hnMs_aahUhKE6CrR_mUddDH1kws5ajP6ZIZVK2vBSwoorOv_sMq1OHoTJnTlJ_8V_Ab-KKX-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860449247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A detailed statistical analysis of the performance of CO-RADS and CT-severity score in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to RT-PCR test: a prospective cohort study</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Hadad, Zeina ; Afzelius, Pia</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadad, Zeina ; Afzelius, Pia</creatorcontrib><description>Background Reports from international studies regarding the role of CT scan and RT-PCR test in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease has been a subject of controversy. The purpose of this study was to statistically compare the performance of CT in reporting chest CT scans of coronavirus disease according to Coronavirus Disease Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT severity score (CTSS) with the performance of RT-PCR test. Results The analyzed CT scans of 144 participants were consistent with CO-RADS 1 (n = 38), CO-RADS 2 (n = 11), CO-RADS 3 (n = 35), CO-RADS 4 (n = 23), and CO-RADS 5 (n = 37). CTSS in CO-RADS 1 was (0.9 ± 4), CO-RADS 2 (4 ± 2), CO-RADS 3 (10.2 ± 2), CO-RADS 4 (14 ± 6) and CO-RADS 5 (19 ± 7). There was direct correlation between CO-RADS groups and CTSS (p &lt; 0.001). The mean total CTSS was 10 ± 9 for the whole study population. Ninety-five CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 3, 4 or 5 and 49 CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 1 or 2, with a positive rate of 66% (95% CI 49%, 65%), PPV (55.41%), NPV (45.18%), accuracy (86.8%) and the overall sensitivity (93.18%) and specificity (76.8%) of CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia when categorized and analyzed according to CO-RADS and CTSS. Sixty-four patients had positive initial RT-PCR tests and 80 patients had negative initial RT-PCR test, with a positive rate of 44.4% (95% CI 35%, 51%), PPV (41.13%), NPV (59.51%), accuracy (74.3%), sensitivity (64.2%) and specificity (93.9%). The Kappa ([kappa]) value of average inter-reader agreement was 88% (95% CI 80%, 96%). Conclusions RT-PCR test showed higher specificity and NPV compared to CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia, while CT showed higher sensitivity, PPV, accuracy and positive rate, respectively. CT was superior to RT-PCR test in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia especially at early stages of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-603X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43055-023-01099-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo: Springer</publisher><subject>Bacterial pneumonia ; Cohort analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; CT imaging ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic imaging ; Diseases ; Fever ; Infection ; Infections ; Lung ; Lungs ; Medical imaging ; Medical laboratories ; Pneumonia ; Reporting ; Respiration ; Sarcoidosis ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Statistical analysis ; Thorax</subject><ispartof>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine, 2023-12, Vol.54 (1), p.148-12</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2860449247/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2860449247?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadad, Zeina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afzelius, Pia</creatorcontrib><title>A detailed statistical analysis of the performance of CO-RADS and CT-severity score in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to RT-PCR test: a prospective cohort study</title><title>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</title><description>Background Reports from international studies regarding the role of CT scan and RT-PCR test in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease has been a subject of controversy. The purpose of this study was to statistically compare the performance of CT in reporting chest CT scans of coronavirus disease according to Coronavirus Disease Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT severity score (CTSS) with the performance of RT-PCR test. Results The analyzed CT scans of 144 participants were consistent with CO-RADS 1 (n = 38), CO-RADS 2 (n = 11), CO-RADS 3 (n = 35), CO-RADS 4 (n = 23), and CO-RADS 5 (n = 37). CTSS in CO-RADS 1 was (0.9 ± 4), CO-RADS 2 (4 ± 2), CO-RADS 3 (10.2 ± 2), CO-RADS 4 (14 ± 6) and CO-RADS 5 (19 ± 7). There was direct correlation between CO-RADS groups and CTSS (p &lt; 0.001). The mean total CTSS was 10 ± 9 for the whole study population. Ninety-five CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 3, 4 or 5 and 49 CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 1 or 2, with a positive rate of 66% (95% CI 49%, 65%), PPV (55.41%), NPV (45.18%), accuracy (86.8%) and the overall sensitivity (93.18%) and specificity (76.8%) of CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia when categorized and analyzed according to CO-RADS and CTSS. Sixty-four patients had positive initial RT-PCR tests and 80 patients had negative initial RT-PCR test, with a positive rate of 44.4% (95% CI 35%, 51%), PPV (41.13%), NPV (59.51%), accuracy (74.3%), sensitivity (64.2%) and specificity (93.9%). The Kappa ([kappa]) value of average inter-reader agreement was 88% (95% CI 80%, 96%). Conclusions RT-PCR test showed higher specificity and NPV compared to CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia, while CT showed higher sensitivity, PPV, accuracy and positive rate, respectively. CT was superior to RT-PCR test in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia especially at early stages of the disease.</description><subject>Bacterial pneumonia</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Reporting</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><issn>0378-603X</issn><issn>2090-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUdGKEzEUDaJgqfsDPgV8znozk8lkfCuzuhYWKrWKb0Oa3HRTOpMxSRf6U36jcXdBH0weAodzzr3nhJC3HK45V_J9EjU0DYOqZsCh65h8QRYVdMBEK6uXZAF1q5iE-sdrcpXSEcoRAFyKBfm1ohaz9ie0NGWdfcre6BPVkz5dkk80OJrvkc4YXYijngz-gfoN265uvhaapf2OJXzA6POFJhMiUj89aqzXhyk8m_Sb7-sbxjs6T3gew-Q1NWGcdSyDc6DbHfvSb2nGlD9QTecY0owm-wcstPsQc9nubC9vyCunTwmvnt8l-fbp467_zO42t-t-dceMEG1miMhV5WplbWUr3rV7XRvLqwYADbSqM6UoEM1eCG5RFGQvG-UKoMGBwnpJ1k--NujjMEc_6ngZgvbDIxDiYdCxNHXCgRdhq8ye88YJB1IpjaX2TvLaua4ssSTvnrxKqJ_nEnA4hnMs_aahUhKE6CrR_mUddDH1kws5ajP6ZIZVK2vBSwoorOv_sMq1OHoTJnTlJ_8V_Ab-KKX-</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Hadad, Zeina</creator><creator>Afzelius, Pia</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>A detailed statistical analysis of the performance of CO-RADS and CT-severity score in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to RT-PCR test: a prospective cohort study</title><author>Hadad, Zeina ; Afzelius, Pia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-eee182f38dd2d2197ba3cd12500ec0789c010045b441de4078b658f45ba0f08e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bacterial pneumonia</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Reporting</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadad, Zeina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afzelius, Pia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadad, Zeina</au><au>Afzelius, Pia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A detailed statistical analysis of the performance of CO-RADS and CT-severity score in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to RT-PCR test: a prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>148-12</pages><issn>0378-603X</issn><eissn>2090-4762</eissn><abstract>Background Reports from international studies regarding the role of CT scan and RT-PCR test in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease has been a subject of controversy. The purpose of this study was to statistically compare the performance of CT in reporting chest CT scans of coronavirus disease according to Coronavirus Disease Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT severity score (CTSS) with the performance of RT-PCR test. Results The analyzed CT scans of 144 participants were consistent with CO-RADS 1 (n = 38), CO-RADS 2 (n = 11), CO-RADS 3 (n = 35), CO-RADS 4 (n = 23), and CO-RADS 5 (n = 37). CTSS in CO-RADS 1 was (0.9 ± 4), CO-RADS 2 (4 ± 2), CO-RADS 3 (10.2 ± 2), CO-RADS 4 (14 ± 6) and CO-RADS 5 (19 ± 7). There was direct correlation between CO-RADS groups and CTSS (p &lt; 0.001). The mean total CTSS was 10 ± 9 for the whole study population. Ninety-five CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 3, 4 or 5 and 49 CT scans were compatible with CO-RADS 1 or 2, with a positive rate of 66% (95% CI 49%, 65%), PPV (55.41%), NPV (45.18%), accuracy (86.8%) and the overall sensitivity (93.18%) and specificity (76.8%) of CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia when categorized and analyzed according to CO-RADS and CTSS. Sixty-four patients had positive initial RT-PCR tests and 80 patients had negative initial RT-PCR test, with a positive rate of 44.4% (95% CI 35%, 51%), PPV (41.13%), NPV (59.51%), accuracy (74.3%), sensitivity (64.2%) and specificity (93.9%). The Kappa ([kappa]) value of average inter-reader agreement was 88% (95% CI 80%, 96%). Conclusions RT-PCR test showed higher specificity and NPV compared to CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia, while CT showed higher sensitivity, PPV, accuracy and positive rate, respectively. CT was superior to RT-PCR test in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia especially at early stages of the disease.</abstract><cop>Cairo</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1186/s43055-023-01099-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-603X
ispartof Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine, 2023-12, Vol.54 (1), p.148-12
issn 0378-603X
2090-4762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2860449247
source Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Bacterial pneumonia
Cohort analysis
Comparative analysis
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
CT imaging
Diagnosis
Diagnostic imaging
Diseases
Fever
Infection
Infections
Lung
Lungs
Medical imaging
Medical laboratories
Pneumonia
Reporting
Respiration
Sarcoidosis
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Statistical analysis
Thorax
title A detailed statistical analysis of the performance of CO-RADS and CT-severity score in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to RT-PCR test: a prospective cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20detailed%20statistical%20analysis%20of%20the%20performance%20of%20CO-RADS%20and%20CT-severity%20score%20in%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20COVID-19%20pneumonia%20compared%20to%20RT-PCR%20test:%20a%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Egyptian%20journal%20of%20radiology%20and%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Hadad,%20Zeina&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=148-12&rft.issn=0378-603X&rft.eissn=2090-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43055-023-01099-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA763411970%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-eee182f38dd2d2197ba3cd12500ec0789c010045b441de4078b658f45ba0f08e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860449247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A763411970&rfr_iscdi=true