Loading…

Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?

A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly wor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of real estate finance and economics 2023-10, Vol.67 (3), p.517-544
Main Authors: Allen, Marcus T., Benefield, Justin D., Rutherford, Ronald C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3
container_end_page 544
container_issue 3
container_start_page 517
container_title The journal of real estate finance and economics
container_volume 67
creator Allen, Marcus T.
Benefield, Justin D.
Rutherford, Ronald C.
description A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2861997424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2861997424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAYRYMoOI7-AVcF19Ev78SN6OALCrNwBHchzaSlg9OOScrgv7dawZ2ruzn3XjgInRO4JADqKhFCuMRACQajhcb7AzQjQjEMXLwdohloI7CQTB-jk5Q2ACCVhhliix6Xbcpt1xQvObocmjak6-Iu5BxisYquS87ntu-K5ZB9vw3p5hQd1e49hbPfnKPXh_vV4gmXy8fnxW2JPQeTceWlhDVxPIxnFVeGgDCOc-cNqxzjmq2prgSlREKtKgfBM-NIXXsqXVCOzdHFtLuL_ccQUrabfojdeGmplsQYxSkfKTpRPvYpxVDbXWy3Ln5aAvZbjp3k2FGO_ZFj92OJTaU0wl0T4t_0P60vuE5m-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861997424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Allen, Marcus T. ; Benefield, Justin D. ; Rutherford, Ronald C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marcus T. ; Benefield, Justin D. ; Rutherford, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><description>A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-5638</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agents ; Brokerage ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial Services ; Marketing ; Multiple listing services ; Popularity ; Prices ; Real estate agents &amp; brokers ; Real estate sales ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Teams</subject><ispartof>The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2023-10, Vol.67 (3), p.517-544</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0967-6819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2861997424/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2861997424?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benefield, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><title>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</title><title>The journal of real estate finance and economics</title><addtitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</addtitle><description>A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.</description><subject>Agents</subject><subject>Brokerage</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial Services</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Multiple listing services</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Real estate agents &amp; brokers</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>0895-5638</issn><issn>1573-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAYRYMoOI7-AVcF19Ev78SN6OALCrNwBHchzaSlg9OOScrgv7dawZ2ruzn3XjgInRO4JADqKhFCuMRACQajhcb7AzQjQjEMXLwdohloI7CQTB-jk5Q2ACCVhhliix6Xbcpt1xQvObocmjak6-Iu5BxisYquS87ntu-K5ZB9vw3p5hQd1e49hbPfnKPXh_vV4gmXy8fnxW2JPQeTceWlhDVxPIxnFVeGgDCOc-cNqxzjmq2prgSlREKtKgfBM-NIXXsqXVCOzdHFtLuL_ccQUrabfojdeGmplsQYxSkfKTpRPvYpxVDbXWy3Ln5aAvZbjp3k2FGO_ZFj92OJTaU0wl0T4t_0P60vuE5m-w</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Allen, Marcus T.</creator><creator>Benefield, Justin D.</creator><creator>Rutherford, Ronald C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-6819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</title><author>Allen, Marcus T. ; Benefield, Justin D. ; Rutherford, Ronald C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agents</topic><topic>Brokerage</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial Services</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Multiple listing services</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Real estate agents &amp; brokers</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benefield, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Marcus T.</au><au>Benefield, Justin D.</au><au>Rutherford, Ronald C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</atitle><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle><stitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>517-544</pages><issn>0895-5638</issn><eissn>1573-045X</eissn><abstract>A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-6819</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-5638
ispartof The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2023-10, Vol.67 (3), p.517-544
issn 0895-5638
1573-045X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2861997424
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link
subjects Agents
Brokerage
Economics
Economics and Finance
Financial Services
Marketing
Multiple listing services
Popularity
Prices
Real estate agents & brokers
Real estate sales
Regional/Spatial Science
Teams
title Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Co-Listing%20Strategies:%20Better%20Transaction%20Outcomes?&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20real%20estate%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=Allen,%20Marcus%20T.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=517-544&rft.issn=0895-5638&rft.eissn=1573-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2861997424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861997424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true