Loading…
Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?
A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly wor...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of real estate finance and economics 2023-10, Vol.67 (3), p.517-544 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3 |
container_end_page | 544 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 517 |
container_title | The journal of real estate finance and economics |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Allen, Marcus T. Benefield, Justin D. Rutherford, Ronald C. |
description | A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2861997424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2861997424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAYRYMoOI7-AVcF19Ev78SN6OALCrNwBHchzaSlg9OOScrgv7dawZ2ruzn3XjgInRO4JADqKhFCuMRACQajhcb7AzQjQjEMXLwdohloI7CQTB-jk5Q2ACCVhhliix6Xbcpt1xQvObocmjak6-Iu5BxisYquS87ntu-K5ZB9vw3p5hQd1e49hbPfnKPXh_vV4gmXy8fnxW2JPQeTceWlhDVxPIxnFVeGgDCOc-cNqxzjmq2prgSlREKtKgfBM-NIXXsqXVCOzdHFtLuL_ccQUrabfojdeGmplsQYxSkfKTpRPvYpxVDbXWy3Ln5aAvZbjp3k2FGO_ZFj92OJTaU0wl0T4t_0P60vuE5m-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861997424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Allen, Marcus T. ; Benefield, Justin D. ; Rutherford, Ronald C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marcus T. ; Benefield, Justin D. ; Rutherford, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><description>A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-5638</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agents ; Brokerage ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial Services ; Marketing ; Multiple listing services ; Popularity ; Prices ; Real estate agents & brokers ; Real estate sales ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Teams</subject><ispartof>The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2023-10, Vol.67 (3), p.517-544</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0967-6819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2861997424/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2861997424?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benefield, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><title>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</title><title>The journal of real estate finance and economics</title><addtitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</addtitle><description>A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.</description><subject>Agents</subject><subject>Brokerage</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial Services</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Multiple listing services</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Real estate agents & brokers</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>0895-5638</issn><issn>1573-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAYRYMoOI7-AVcF19Ev78SN6OALCrNwBHchzaSlg9OOScrgv7dawZ2ruzn3XjgInRO4JADqKhFCuMRACQajhcb7AzQjQjEMXLwdohloI7CQTB-jk5Q2ACCVhhliix6Xbcpt1xQvObocmjak6-Iu5BxisYquS87ntu-K5ZB9vw3p5hQd1e49hbPfnKPXh_vV4gmXy8fnxW2JPQeTceWlhDVxPIxnFVeGgDCOc-cNqxzjmq2prgSlREKtKgfBM-NIXXsqXVCOzdHFtLuL_ccQUrabfojdeGmplsQYxSkfKTpRPvYpxVDbXWy3Ln5aAvZbjp3k2FGO_ZFj92OJTaU0wl0T4t_0P60vuE5m-w</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Allen, Marcus T.</creator><creator>Benefield, Justin D.</creator><creator>Rutherford, Ronald C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-6819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</title><author>Allen, Marcus T. ; Benefield, Justin D. ; Rutherford, Ronald C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agents</topic><topic>Brokerage</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial Services</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Multiple listing services</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Real estate agents & brokers</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Marcus T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benefield, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Marcus T.</au><au>Benefield, Justin D.</au><au>Rutherford, Ronald C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes?</atitle><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle><stitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>517-544</pages><issn>0895-5638</issn><eissn>1573-045X</eissn><abstract>A co-listing strategy exists when two or more listing agents jointly represent the owner of a property who desires to sell it. This strategy is not new in the real estate brokerage industry, but its popularity has increased during recent years with the formation of teams of agents who repeatedly work together using the co-listing strategy. To date, the literature has not analyzed this business strategy. This study investigates the probability of selling, selling price, and time on market effects related to the use of the co-listing strategy. The results of this study indicate that co-listing is associated with a higher probability of sale, an increased selling price, and a marginal longer or shorter marketing time, depending on the situation. Comparing market outcomes for agents who form teams and repeatedly employ the co-listing strategy against market outcomes for agents who are involved in only one co-listing indicates that both types of co-listing produce higher prices and are more likely to result in a sale, but the effects for repeated co-listings are larger in magnitude. Additionally, repeated co-listing slightly reduces marketing time, but single co-listing slightly increases marketing time. The marketing time effects in both repeated and single co-listings, however, are too small to be economically important. In general, this study suggests that sellers are better served by the co-listing strategy compared to no co-listing, especially when the co-listing agents repeatedly work together in teams.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-6819</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-5638 |
ispartof | The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2023-10, Vol.67 (3), p.517-544 |
issn | 0895-5638 1573-045X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2861997424 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Agents Brokerage Economics Economics and Finance Financial Services Marketing Multiple listing services Popularity Prices Real estate agents & brokers Real estate sales Regional/Spatial Science Teams |
title | Co-Listing Strategies: Better Transaction Outcomes? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Co-Listing%20Strategies:%20Better%20Transaction%20Outcomes?&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20real%20estate%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=Allen,%20Marcus%20T.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=517-544&rft.issn=0895-5638&rft.eissn=1573-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11146-021-09858-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2861997424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc660d1a4e006b4791059a44ac93ba3483d28b522160f7ba0ec39a1ffc26ae7a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861997424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |