Loading…

Andhra Pradesh State Finances: Initial Years of AP Reorganisation Act, 2014 1

Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 (APRA, 2014) pushed Andhra Pradesh (AP) into murkiness in almost all aspects. The consequence of split of the state is multidimensional. Illogicalities in APRA, 2014, mainly relating to allotment of tax arrears; disappointing economic composition; with seven b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Economic Policy and Research 2021-10, Vol.17 (1), p.14-34
Main Author: Sreedevi, N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Journal of Economic Policy and Research
container_volume 17
creator Sreedevi, N
description Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 (APRA, 2014) pushed Andhra Pradesh (AP) into murkiness in almost all aspects. The consequence of split of the state is multidimensional. Illogicalities in APRA, 2014, mainly relating to allotment of tax arrears; disappointing economic composition; with seven backward districts (of the total I 3 districts), very few urban areas; and deprivation of eclectic and engrained Organizations of National reputation pressurizes the economic and social development and ultimately state exchequer. AP state, which had a revenue surplus situation tumbled into a dearth condition. Having reservations regarding assessment of Resource Gap for 2014-15 fiscal year further burdened the state budget. Incompatibility between high-speed growing expenditures and slow-uptake of own resources led to a dependency on central transfers. Hence, the AP state fails to reach the FRBM norms such as fiscal deficit / GSDP and debt / GSDP indicators set by Fourteenth Finance Commission.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2862650119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862650119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28626501193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrEOgjAUQNEOmkiUf3iJqyRttRTciJHoYELUxYm8QJES0mpb_l8HP8DpDufOSERzKZJMSLkgsfcDpZTnXGRcRuRSmLZ3CJXDVvkebgGDglIbNI3yezgbHTSO8FDoPNgOigquyronGu0xaGugaMIGOGU7YCsy73D0Kv51Sdbl8X44JS9n35PyoR7s5MyXap6lPBWUsXz73_UBfbI7TA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862650119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Andhra Pradesh State Finances: Initial Years of AP Reorganisation Act, 2014 1</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Sreedevi, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Sreedevi, N</creatorcontrib><description>Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 (APRA, 2014) pushed Andhra Pradesh (AP) into murkiness in almost all aspects. The consequence of split of the state is multidimensional. Illogicalities in APRA, 2014, mainly relating to allotment of tax arrears; disappointing economic composition; with seven backward districts (of the total I 3 districts), very few urban areas; and deprivation of eclectic and engrained Organizations of National reputation pressurizes the economic and social development and ultimately state exchequer. AP state, which had a revenue surplus situation tumbled into a dearth condition. Having reservations regarding assessment of Resource Gap for 2014-15 fiscal year further burdened the state budget. Incompatibility between high-speed growing expenditures and slow-uptake of own resources led to a dependency on central transfers. Hence, the AP state fails to reach the FRBM norms such as fiscal deficit / GSDP and debt / GSDP indicators set by Fourteenth Finance Commission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0975-8577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hyderabad: Institute of Public Enterprise (IPE)</publisher><subject>Capital expenditures ; Deprivation ; Districts ; Economic development ; Economic policy ; Expenditures ; Fiscal years ; Growth rate ; Public debt ; Public finance ; Reorganization ; Social development ; State budgets ; Tax reform ; Tax revenues ; Taxation ; Trends ; Urban areas ; Value added</subject><ispartof>Journal of Economic Policy and Research, 2021-10, Vol.17 (1), p.14-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Public Enterprise (IPE) Oct 2021-Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2862650119/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2862650119?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27866,36060,44363,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sreedevi, N</creatorcontrib><title>Andhra Pradesh State Finances: Initial Years of AP Reorganisation Act, 2014 1</title><title>Journal of Economic Policy and Research</title><description>Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 (APRA, 2014) pushed Andhra Pradesh (AP) into murkiness in almost all aspects. The consequence of split of the state is multidimensional. Illogicalities in APRA, 2014, mainly relating to allotment of tax arrears; disappointing economic composition; with seven backward districts (of the total I 3 districts), very few urban areas; and deprivation of eclectic and engrained Organizations of National reputation pressurizes the economic and social development and ultimately state exchequer. AP state, which had a revenue surplus situation tumbled into a dearth condition. Having reservations regarding assessment of Resource Gap for 2014-15 fiscal year further burdened the state budget. Incompatibility between high-speed growing expenditures and slow-uptake of own resources led to a dependency on central transfers. Hence, the AP state fails to reach the FRBM norms such as fiscal deficit / GSDP and debt / GSDP indicators set by Fourteenth Finance Commission.</description><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>Districts</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fiscal years</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Public debt</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Reorganization</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>State budgets</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Tax revenues</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Value added</subject><issn>0975-8577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrEOgjAUQNEOmkiUf3iJqyRttRTciJHoYELUxYm8QJES0mpb_l8HP8DpDufOSERzKZJMSLkgsfcDpZTnXGRcRuRSmLZ3CJXDVvkebgGDglIbNI3yezgbHTSO8FDoPNgOigquyronGu0xaGugaMIGOGU7YCsy73D0Kv51Sdbl8X44JS9n35PyoR7s5MyXap6lPBWUsXz73_UBfbI7TA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Sreedevi, N</creator><general>Institute of Public Enterprise (IPE)</general><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Andhra Pradesh State Finances: Initial Years of AP Reorganisation Act, 2014 1</title><author>Sreedevi, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28626501193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>Districts</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fiscal years</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Public debt</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Reorganization</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>State budgets</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Tax revenues</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Value added</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sreedevi, N</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Economic Policy and Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sreedevi, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Andhra Pradesh State Finances: Initial Years of AP Reorganisation Act, 2014 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Economic Policy and Research</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>14-34</pages><issn>0975-8577</issn><abstract>Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 (APRA, 2014) pushed Andhra Pradesh (AP) into murkiness in almost all aspects. The consequence of split of the state is multidimensional. Illogicalities in APRA, 2014, mainly relating to allotment of tax arrears; disappointing economic composition; with seven backward districts (of the total I 3 districts), very few urban areas; and deprivation of eclectic and engrained Organizations of National reputation pressurizes the economic and social development and ultimately state exchequer. AP state, which had a revenue surplus situation tumbled into a dearth condition. Having reservations regarding assessment of Resource Gap for 2014-15 fiscal year further burdened the state budget. Incompatibility between high-speed growing expenditures and slow-uptake of own resources led to a dependency on central transfers. Hence, the AP state fails to reach the FRBM norms such as fiscal deficit / GSDP and debt / GSDP indicators set by Fourteenth Finance Commission.</abstract><cop>Hyderabad</cop><pub>Institute of Public Enterprise (IPE)</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0975-8577
ispartof Journal of Economic Policy and Research, 2021-10, Vol.17 (1), p.14-34
issn 0975-8577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2862650119
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); PAIS Index
subjects Capital expenditures
Deprivation
Districts
Economic development
Economic policy
Expenditures
Fiscal years
Growth rate
Public debt
Public finance
Reorganization
Social development
State budgets
Tax reform
Tax revenues
Taxation
Trends
Urban areas
Value added
title Andhra Pradesh State Finances: Initial Years of AP Reorganisation Act, 2014 1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A30%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Andhra%20Pradesh%20State%20Finances:%20Initial%20Years%20of%20AP%20Reorganisation%20Act,%202014%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Economic%20Policy%20and%20Research&rft.au=Sreedevi,%20N&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=14-34&rft.issn=0975-8577&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2862650119%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28626501193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862650119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true