Loading…
Debating Patriarchy
The book concludes with an overview of current uses of the concept of patriarchy from fundamentalist Christian activism, over foreign policy analyses of oppressive regimes, to scholarly debates about forms of effective governance. [...]it pursues some salient highlights of how people have used the c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.) Vic.), 2020-10 (26), p.221-253 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 253 |
container_issue | 26 |
container_start_page | 221 |
container_title | Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.) |
container_volume | |
creator | Adams, Julia Roth, Benita Miller, Pavla |
description | The book concludes with an overview of current uses of the concept of patriarchy from fundamentalist Christian activism, over foreign policy analyses of oppressive regimes, to scholarly debates about forms of effective governance. [...]it pursues some salient highlights of how people have used the concept of patriarchy, rather than trying to explore in any detailed way the relationship between theory and empirics. Many will necessarily read this book in light of Miller's earlier, excellent Tran formations of Patriarchy in the West, 1500- 1900.4 The first part of that text explored what is the historical mid-section of the present book: the moment of early modern patriarchalism and the shift to fraternalism, via the wave of great European revolutions that kicked off in the eighteenth century. Miller was most influenced by Carole Pateman, herself building on Sir Robert Filmer, the social contract tradition, and Sigmund Freud. [...]the big political story is the transition from absolutist father-rule to fraternal revolutions that excluded women from the nascent public sphere. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2862686318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862686318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28626863183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0sDA01rWwtDTgYOAqLs4yMDC0NDIw4mQQdklNSizJzEtXCEgsKcpMLErOqORhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjCzMjMwszY0MLY-JUAQAjsie9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862686318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debating Patriarchy</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Adams, Julia ; Roth, Benita ; Miller, Pavla</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Julia ; Roth, Benita ; Miller, Pavla</creatorcontrib><description>The book concludes with an overview of current uses of the concept of patriarchy from fundamentalist Christian activism, over foreign policy analyses of oppressive regimes, to scholarly debates about forms of effective governance. [...]it pursues some salient highlights of how people have used the concept of patriarchy, rather than trying to explore in any detailed way the relationship between theory and empirics. Many will necessarily read this book in light of Miller's earlier, excellent Tran formations of Patriarchy in the West, 1500- 1900.4 The first part of that text explored what is the historical mid-section of the present book: the moment of early modern patriarchalism and the shift to fraternalism, via the wave of great European revolutions that kicked off in the eighteenth century. Miller was most influenced by Carole Pateman, herself building on Sir Robert Filmer, the social contract tradition, and Sigmund Freud. [...]the big political story is the transition from absolutist father-rule to fraternal revolutions that excluded women from the nascent public sphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0813-8990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wollongong: Australian Women's History Network</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Fathers ; Feminism ; French Revolution ; History ; Modernity ; Patriarchy ; Political economy ; Social order ; Weber, Max (1864-1920)</subject><ispartof>Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.), 2020-10 (26), p.221-253</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2862686318/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2862686318?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Benita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Pavla</creatorcontrib><title>Debating Patriarchy</title><title>Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.)</title><description>The book concludes with an overview of current uses of the concept of patriarchy from fundamentalist Christian activism, over foreign policy analyses of oppressive regimes, to scholarly debates about forms of effective governance. [...]it pursues some salient highlights of how people have used the concept of patriarchy, rather than trying to explore in any detailed way the relationship between theory and empirics. Many will necessarily read this book in light of Miller's earlier, excellent Tran formations of Patriarchy in the West, 1500- 1900.4 The first part of that text explored what is the historical mid-section of the present book: the moment of early modern patriarchalism and the shift to fraternalism, via the wave of great European revolutions that kicked off in the eighteenth century. Miller was most influenced by Carole Pateman, herself building on Sir Robert Filmer, the social contract tradition, and Sigmund Freud. [...]the big political story is the transition from absolutist father-rule to fraternal revolutions that excluded women from the nascent public sphere.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>French Revolution</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Patriarchy</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Social order</subject><subject>Weber, Max (1864-1920)</subject><issn>0813-8990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0sDA01rWwtDTgYOAqLs4yMDC0NDIw4mQQdklNSizJzEtXCEgsKcpMLErOqORhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjCzMjMwszY0MLY-JUAQAjsie9</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Adams, Julia</creator><creator>Roth, Benita</creator><creator>Miller, Pavla</creator><general>Australian Women's History Network</general><scope>7R6</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Debating Patriarchy</title><author>Adams, Julia ; Roth, Benita ; Miller, Pavla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28626863183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>French Revolution</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Patriarchy</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Social order</topic><topic>Weber, Max (1864-1920)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Benita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Pavla</creatorcontrib><collection>GenderWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Julia</au><au>Roth, Benita</au><au>Miller, Pavla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Debating Patriarchy</atitle><jtitle>Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.)</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issue>26</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>221-253</pages><issn>0813-8990</issn><abstract>The book concludes with an overview of current uses of the concept of patriarchy from fundamentalist Christian activism, over foreign policy analyses of oppressive regimes, to scholarly debates about forms of effective governance. [...]it pursues some salient highlights of how people have used the concept of patriarchy, rather than trying to explore in any detailed way the relationship between theory and empirics. Many will necessarily read this book in light of Miller's earlier, excellent Tran formations of Patriarchy in the West, 1500- 1900.4 The first part of that text explored what is the historical mid-section of the present book: the moment of early modern patriarchalism and the shift to fraternalism, via the wave of great European revolutions that kicked off in the eighteenth century. Miller was most influenced by Carole Pateman, herself building on Sir Robert Filmer, the social contract tradition, and Sigmund Freud. [...]the big political story is the transition from absolutist father-rule to fraternal revolutions that excluded women from the nascent public sphere.</abstract><cop>Wollongong</cop><pub>Australian Women's History Network</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0813-8990 |
ispartof | Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.), 2020-10 (26), p.221-253 |
issn | 0813-8990 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2862686318 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Alliances Fathers Feminism French Revolution History Modernity Patriarchy Political economy Social order Weber, Max (1864-1920) |
title | Debating Patriarchy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Debating%20Patriarchy&rft.jtitle=Lilith%20(Fitzroy,%20Vic.)&rft.au=Adams,%20Julia&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=221-253&rft.issn=0813-8990&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2862686318%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28626863183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862686318&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |