A Systematic Literature Review of Research on Social Procurement in the Construction and Infrastructure Sector: Barriers, Enablers, and Strategies

• Published in: Sustainability 2023-09, Vol.15 (17), p.12964
• Main Authors: Lou, Catherine Xiaocui, Natoli, Riccardo, Goodwin, David, Bok, Barbara, Zhao, Fang, Zhang, Peng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Construction industry; Emission standards; Government agencies; Government purchasing; Infrastructure; Infrastructure (Economics); Literature reviews; Purchasing; Social impact; Suppliers; Supply chains; Sustainability; Systematic review; Value creation
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su151712964

In Australia, a new feature of public policy is the requirement by governments that large-scale infrastructure projects integrate social procurement practices that alter the traditional focus on balancing price and quality. Social procurement has been gradually developing in practice, but the academic literature has not kept pace. Although past research has identified some of the barriers affecting social procurement implementation in the construction industry, the nature of the barriers impeding its proliferation has not to date been systematically reviewed. This paper undertakes a review of the social procurement literature published from January 2012 to 30 June 2022, with 49 papers chosen under selective criteria. This critical review employs the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) technique to retrieve secondary data on social procurement from available peer-reviewed academic papers through three databases (Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science). The literature analysis focuses on three themes: (1) barriers; (2) enablers; and (3) strategies to overcome the barriers. The paper finds that social procurement as a field of practice is evolving and expanding, but its role in contributing to social value creation remains an under-theorised concept. Recommendations for practice and future research are identified, including the need to measure the real-world impacts of policy.